Luyun Chen1, Lisa Kane Low2, John Ol DeLancey3, James A Ashton-Miller4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: luyunc@umich.edu. 2. School of Nursing and Women׳s Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The perineal body must undergo a remarkable transformation during pregnancy to accommodate an estimated stretch ratio of over 3.3 in order to permit vaginal delivery of the fetal head. Yet measurements of perineal body elastic properties are lacking in vivo, whether in the pregnant or non-pregnant state. The objective of this study, therefore, was to develop a method for measuring perineal body elastic modulus and to test its feasibility in young nulliparous women. METHODS: An UltraSONIX RP500 ultrasound system was equipped with elastography software. Approximately 1 Hz free-hand sinusoidal compression loading of the perineum was used to measure the relative stiffness of the perineal body compared to that of a custom reference standoff pad with a modulus of 36.7 kPa. Measurements were made in 20 healthy nulliparous women. Four subjects were invited back for second and third visits to evaluate within- and between-visit repeatability using the coefficient of variation. RESULTS: The mean ± SD elastic compression modulus of the perineal body was 28.9 ± 4.7 kPa. Within- and between-visit repeatability averaged 3.4% and 8.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound elastography using a standoff pad reference provides a valid method for evaluating the elastic modulus of the perineal body in living women.
OBJECTIVE: The perineal body must undergo a remarkable transformation during pregnancy to accommodate an estimated stretch ratio of over 3.3 in order to permit vaginal delivery of the fetal head. Yet measurements of perineal body elastic properties are lacking in vivo, whether in the pregnant or non-pregnant state. The objective of this study, therefore, was to develop a method for measuring perineal body elastic modulus and to test its feasibility in young nulliparous women. METHODS: An UltraSONIX RP500 ultrasound system was equipped with elastography software. Approximately 1 Hz free-hand sinusoidal compression loading of the perineum was used to measure the relative stiffness of the perineal body compared to that of a custom reference standoff pad with a modulus of 36.7 kPa. Measurements were made in 20 healthy nulliparous women. Four subjects were invited back for second and third visits to evaluate within- and between-visit repeatability using the coefficient of variation. RESULTS: The mean ± SD elastic compression modulus of the perineal body was 28.9 ± 4.7 kPa. Within- and between-visit repeatability averaged 3.4% and 8.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound elastography using a standoff pad reference provides a valid method for evaluating the elastic modulus of the perineal body in living women.
Authors: Omid Mohareri; Angelica Ruszkowski; Julio Lobo; Joseph Ischia; Ali Baghani; Guy Nir; Hani Eskandari; Edward Jones; Ladan Fazli; Larry Goldenberg; Mehdi Moradi; Septimiu Salcudean Journal: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Date: 2014
Authors: Jennifer M Wu; Catherine A Matthews; Mitchell M Conover; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: E Hernandez-Andrade; S S Hassan; H Ahn; S J Korzeniewski; L Yeo; T Chaiworapongsa; R Romero Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Mark L Palmeri; Helen Feltovich; Andrew D Homyk; Lindsey C Carlson; Timothy J Hall Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Canxing Xu; Chun Yuan; Edward Stutzman; Gador Canton; Keith A Comess; Kirk W Beach Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 2.998