Literature DB >> 25800324

Emerging from the bottleneck: benefits of the comparative approach to modern neuroscience.

Eliot A Brenowitz1, Harold H Zakon2.   

Abstract

Neuroscience has historically exploited a wide diversity of animal taxa. Recently, however, research has focused increasingly on a few model species. This trend has accelerated with the genetic revolution, as genomic sequences and genetic tools became available for a few species, which formed a bottleneck. This coalescence on a small set of model species comes with several costs that are often not considered, especially in the current drive to use mice explicitly as models for human diseases. Comparative studies of strategically chosen non-model species can complement model species research and yield more rigorous studies. As genetic sequences and tools become available for many more species, we are poised to emerge from the bottleneck and once again exploit the rich biological diversity offered by comparative studies.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative; model; mouse; translational

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25800324      PMCID: PMC4417368          DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Neurosci        ISSN: 0166-2236            Impact factor:   13.837


  77 in total

1.  Hippocampal neurogenesis in adult Old World primates.

Authors:  E Gould; A J Reeves; M Fallah; P Tanapat; C G Gross; E Fuchs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Non-mammalian models for studying neural development and function.

Authors:  Eve Marder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Eric J Nestler; Steven E Hyman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Postnatal mouse subventricular zone neuronal precursors can migrate and differentiate within multiple levels of the developing neuraxis.

Authors:  D A Lim; G J Fishell; A Alvarez-Buylla
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas of the songbird brain.

Authors:  F Nottebohm; A P Arnold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-10-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Benzothiophene Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators Provide Neuroprotection by a novel GPR30-dependent Mechanism.

Authors:  Ramy Abdelhamid; Jia Luo; Lawren Vandevrede; Indraneel Kundu; Bradley Michalsen; Vladislav A Litosh; Isaac T Schiefer; Teshome Gherezghiher; Ping Yao; Zhihui Qin; Gregory R J Thatcher
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 7.  Diversity matters: the importance of comparative studies and the potential for synergy between neuroscience and evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Bruce A Carlson
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2012-08

Review 8.  Strategic approaches to developing drug treatments for ALS.

Authors:  Andrea M Vincent; Stacey A Sakowski; Adam Schuyler; Eva L Feldman
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 7.851

9.  Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel.

Authors:  Georg Nagel; Tanjef Szellas; Wolfram Huhn; Suneel Kateriya; Nona Adeishvili; Peter Berthold; Doris Ollig; Peter Hegemann; Ernst Bamberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Walking modulates speed sensitivity in Drosophila motion vision.

Authors:  M Eugenia Chiappe; Johannes D Seelig; Michael B Reiser; Vivek Jayaraman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  30 in total

1.  Recognition Memory in Marmoset and Macaque Monkeys: A Comparison of Active Vision.

Authors:  Samuel U Nummela; Michael J Jutras; John T Wixted; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Cory T Miller
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Evolutionary diversity as a catalyst for biological discovery.

Authors:  Zachary V Johnson; Larry J Young
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.654

Review 3.  Sex bias and omission in neuroscience research is influenced by research model and journal, but not reported NIH funding.

Authors:  Gabriella M Mamlouk; David M Dorris; Lily R Barrett; John Meitzen
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 8.606

4.  Neural Circuits Underlying Rodent Sociality: A Comparative Approach.

Authors:  Nicole S Lee; Annaliese K Beery
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019

5.  Oxytocin receptor knockout prairie voles generated by CRISPR/Cas9 editing show reduced preference for social novelty and exaggerated repetitive behaviors.

Authors:  Kengo Horie; Kiyoshi Inoue; Shingo Suzuki; Saki Adachi; Saori Yada; Takashi Hirayama; Shizu Hidema; Larry J Young; Katsuhiko Nishimori
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Twitches, Blinks, and Fidgets: Important Generators of Ongoing Neural Activity.

Authors:  Patrick J Drew; Aaron T Winder; Qingguang Zhang
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 7.519

7.  Electrophysiological properties of medium spiny neurons in the nucleus accumbens core of prepubertal male and female Drd1a-tdTomato line 6 BAC transgenic mice.

Authors:  Jinyan Cao; David M Dorris; John Meitzen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Application of Mouse Models to Research in Hearing and Balance.

Authors:  Kevin K Ohlemiller; Sherri M Jones; Kenneth R Johnson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-17

Review 9.  Applications of CRISPR-Cas systems in neuroscience.

Authors:  Matthias Heidenreich; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Electrosensory processing in Apteronotus albifrons: implications for general and specific neural coding strategies across wave-type weakly electric fish species.

Authors:  Diana Martinez; Michael G Metzen; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.