Alma Ali1, Stefan Wirth, Karla Maria Treitl, Marcus Treitl. 1. Institute for Clinical Radiology, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Nussbaumstr. 20, 80336, Munich, Germany, alma_ali91@yahoo.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We report our experience with polidocanol foam sclerotherapy with no additional coils, evaluating clinical success, patients' satisfaction, and complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 141 patients with 146 varicoceles (mean age: 29.3 years; range: 13 - 60 years) who underwent foam sclerotherapy with polidocanol 2% (range: 2 - 12 ml) in an outpatient setting between January 2007 and December 2013. For the follow-up, telephone interviews with the patients were conducted (mean follow-up time: 46.4 months, standard deviation: 20.17 months). RESULTS: The technical success rate was 91.8%. There was a 55.8% response rate to the telephone interviews. Follow-up revealed a clinical success rate of 83.9% and a persistence or relapse rate of 16.1%. Of the patients, 81.9% were absolutely satisfied with the outcome. In 94.9% of cases, pain or discomfort resolution was reported, and in 97% of cases, aesthetic issues were no longer a problem. Of partners, 63.2% achieved pregnancy, and in 50% of patients with preprocedural testicular atrophy, catch-up growth was observed. One patient with pampiniform plexus phlebitis received inpatient treatment with no long-term damage recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Polidocanol foam varicocele sclerotherapy is a safe and effective procedure, with a high rate of patients' satisfaction, clinical and technical success, and considerable catch-up growth and pregnancy achievement. KEY POINTS: • Varicocele treatment using polidocanol foam sclerotherapy is a safe and effective procedure. • It is easily feasible in an outpatient setting. • The clinical and technical success rates are high. • It shows a high rate of patients' satisfaction and symptom resolution. • Postinterventional catch-up growth and pregnancy achievement are considerable.
OBJECTIVES: We report our experience with polidocanol foam sclerotherapy with no additional coils, evaluating clinical success, patients' satisfaction, and complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 141 patients with 146 varicoceles (mean age: 29.3 years; range: 13 - 60 years) who underwent foam sclerotherapy with polidocanol 2% (range: 2 - 12 ml) in an outpatient setting between January 2007 and December 2013. For the follow-up, telephone interviews with the patients were conducted (mean follow-up time: 46.4 months, standard deviation: 20.17 months). RESULTS: The technical success rate was 91.8%. There was a 55.8% response rate to the telephone interviews. Follow-up revealed a clinical success rate of 83.9% and a persistence or relapse rate of 16.1%. Of the patients, 81.9% were absolutely satisfied with the outcome. In 94.9% of cases, pain or discomfort resolution was reported, and in 97% of cases, aesthetic issues were no longer a problem. Of partners, 63.2% achieved pregnancy, and in 50% of patients with preprocedural testicular atrophy, catch-up growth was observed. One patient with pampiniform plexus phlebitis received inpatient treatment with no long-term damage recorded. CONCLUSIONS:Polidocanol foam varicocele sclerotherapy is a safe and effective procedure, with a high rate of patients' satisfaction, clinical and technical success, and considerable catch-up growth and pregnancy achievement. KEY POINTS: • Varicocele treatment using polidocanol foam sclerotherapy is a safe and effective procedure. • It is easily feasible in an outpatient setting. • The clinical and technical success rates are high. • It shows a high rate of patients' satisfaction and symptom resolution. • Postinterventional catch-up growth and pregnancy achievement are considerable.
Authors: Ahmed Khan Sangrasi; Abdul Aziz Leghari; Aisha Memon; K Altaf Talpur; Aamir Iqbal Memon; Jan Mohammad Memon Journal: J Coll Physicians Surg Pak Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 0.711
Authors: Daniel Y Sze; Jeffrey S Kao; Joan K Frisoli; Stuart W McCallum; William A Kennedy; Mahmood K Razavi Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Carlos F Bechara; Sarah M Weakley; Panagiotis Kougias; Husam Athamneh; Patrick Duffy; Mohit Khera; Katsuhiro Kobayashi; Peter H Lin Journal: Vascular Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.285
Authors: Sergio Quilici Belczak; Vanessa Stefaniak; Leonardo Garcia Góes; Felipe Coelho; Walter Jr Boim de Araújo; Nathalia Almeida Cardoso da Silva Journal: J Vasc Bras Date: 2021-04-28