Literature DB >> 20378038

Laparoscopic versus inguinal (Ivanissevich) varicocelectomy.

Ahmed Khan Sangrasi1, Abdul Aziz Leghari, Aisha Memon, K Altaf Talpur, Aamir Iqbal Memon, Jan Mohammad Memon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the postsurgical outcome of laparoscopic and open inguinal varicocelectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, from July 2003 to June 2007.
METHODOLOGY: One hundred seven patients underwent either open inguinal or laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Diagnosis was made by clinical examination and color Doppler scan in doubtful cases. Pre-operative semen analysis was done in all patients. Operative time, postoperative analgesic requirement in number of tablets, hospital stay in days, improvement in semen parameters in subfertile subjects, pain on visual analog score. and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: There were 50 patients in each group, with age ranging from 12-50 years (26.9+/-7.67 in open inguinal and 26.2+/-7.08 in laparoscopic group). Average operative time was 34.8+/-7.89 minutes for open inguinal and 43.8+/-8.95 minutes for laparoscopic group. The analgesic requirement was 16.3+/-1.58 tablets in the open inguinal and 11.3+/-2.23 in the laparoscopic group. Postoperative pain was significantly less in the laparoscopic group. There was statistically significant (p < 0.001) improvement in sperm count as well as motility in both groups irrespective of procedure.
CONCLUSION: The open inguinal (Ivanissevich) procedure and laparoscopic varicocelectomy had almost equivalent postoperative outcomes regarding improvement in semen parameters and postoperative complications. Open inguinal procedure had a shorter operating time while laparoscopic varicocelectomy had the advantage of less analgesic requirement and short hospital stay. On the whole, open inguinal (loupe magnified) varicocelectomy is an effective procedure where availability and costs of laparoscopic instruments are barriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20378038     DOI: 02.2010/JCPSP.106111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak        ISSN: 1022-386X            Impact factor:   0.711


  2 in total

1.  Treatment of male varicoceles by transcatheter polidocanol foam sclerotherapy: evaluation of clinical success, complications, and patients' satisfaction with regard to alternative techniques.

Authors:  Alma Ali; Stefan Wirth; Karla Maria Treitl; Marcus Treitl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of The Efficacy and Safety of Palomo, Ivanissevich and Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy in Iranian Infertile Men with Palpable Varicocele.

Authors:  Kamal Hosseini; Masoumeh Nejatifar; Ali Kabir
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-01-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.