Literature DB >> 25243562

Simulation in surgery: what's needed next?

Dimitrios Stefanidis1, Nick Sevdalis, John Paige, Boris Zevin, Rajesh Aggarwal, Teodor Grantcharov, Daniel B Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the current state of simulation use in surgery and to offer direction for future research and implementation of evidence-based findings.
BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training (SBT) in surgery has surged in recent years. Although several new simulators and curricula have become available, their optimization and implementation into surgical training has been lagging.
METHODS: Members of the Association for Surgical Education Simulation Committee with expertise in surgical simulation review and interpret the literature and describe the current status of the use of simulation in surgery, identify the challenges to its widespread adoption, and offer potential solutions to these challenges. The review focuses on simulation research and implementation of existing knowledge and explores possible future directions for the field.
RESULTS: Skill acquired on simulators has repeatedly and consistently been demonstrated to transfer to the operating room, and proficiency-based training maximizes this benefit. Several simulation-based curricula have been developed by national organizations to support resident training, but their implementation is lagging because of inadequate human resources, difficult integration of SBT into educational strategy, and logistical barriers. In research, lack of coordinated effort, flaws in study design, changes in simulator-validation concepts, limited attention to skill retention, and other areas are in need of improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Future research in surgical simulation should focus on demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of SBT and its impact on patient outcomes. Furthermore, to enable the more widespread incorporation of best practices and existing simulation curricula in surgery, effective implementation strategies need to be developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25243562     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  35 in total

1.  Evaluating Surgical Resident Needle Insertion Skill Gains in Central Venous Catheterization Training.

Authors:  Hong-En Chen; Mary A Yovanoff; David F Pepley; Rohan S Prabhu; Cheyenne C Sonntag; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  A robotic teaching session: separating tool from technique to emphasize a cognitive focused teaching environment.

Authors:  Courtney A Green; Patricia S O'Sullivan; Hueylan Chern
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-01-09

3.  A model for predicting the GEARS score from virtual reality surgical simulator metrics.

Authors:  Ariel Kate Dubin; Danielle Julian; Alyssa Tanaka; Patricia Mattingly; Roger Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Vessel ligation training via an adaptive simulation curriculum.

Authors:  Yinin Hu; Robyn N Goodrich; Ivy A Le; Kendall D Brooks; Robert G Sawyer; Philip W Smith; Anneke T Schroen; Sara K Rasmussen
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Integrating Robotic Technology Into Resident Training: Challenges and Recommendations From the Front Lines.

Authors:  Courtney A Green; Kelly M Mahuron; Hobart W Harris; Patricia S O'Sullivan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Development of an evidence-based training program for laparoscopic hysterectomy on a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Patrice Crochet; Rajesh Aggarwal; Sophie Knight; Stéphane Berdah; Léon Boubli; Aubert Agostini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Using virtual reality simulation to assess competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Katrine Jensen; Flemming Bjerrum; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The laparoscopic inguinal and diaphragmatic defect (LIDD) model: a validation study of a novel box trainer model.

Authors:  Damir Ljuhar; Samuel Alexander; Sarah Martin; Ramesh Nataraja
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  From the simulation center to the bedside: Validating the efficacy of a dynamic haptic robotic trainer in internal jugular central venous catheter placement.

Authors:  Hong-En Chen; Cheyenne C Sonntag; Katelin A Mirkin; David F Pepley; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Pre-course cognitive training using a smartphone application in orthopaedic intern surgical skills "boot camps".

Authors:  Adam S Levin; Ikram U Haq; Dawn M LaPorte
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.