Literature DB >> 23584820

Impact of operative duration on postoperative pulmonary complications in laparoscopic versus open colectomy.

Rachel M Owen1, Sebastian D Perez, Nathan Lytle, Ankit Patel, S S Davis, Edward Lin, John F Sweeney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prolonged operative duration is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Although laparoscopic colectomy (LC) is associated with longer operative duration compared with open colectomy (OC), research shows paradoxically decreased morbidity following LC versus OC. The direct impact of operative duration on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) following LC versus OC has not been analyzed.
METHODS: We queried the ACS/NSQIP 2009-2010 Public Use File for patients who underwent elective LC and OC. The associations between operative duration and a PPC (pneumonia, intubation >48 h, and unplanned intubation) were evaluated. Multivariable regression models were created to determine the independent effect of operative time on the development of PPC controlling for LC versus OC.
RESULTS: A total of 25,419 colectomies (13,741 laparoscopic and 11,678 open) were reviewed; 765 (3 %) patients experienced at least one PPC. Regression modeling demonstrated that for both LC and OC each 60-min increase in operative time up to 480 min was associated with 13 % increased odds of PPC [odds ratio (OR) 1.13; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.19]. Beyond 480 min, each additional 60-min interval was associated with 33 % increased risk of PPC (OR 1.33; 95 % CI 1.12-1.58). Overall, PPCs occurred half as often following LC [270 (2 %) laparoscopic vs. 497 (4.3 %) open; OR 0.45; 95 % CI 0.39-0.53].
CONCLUSIONS: Operative duration is independently associated with increased risk of PPC in patients undergoing LC and OC. However, a laparoscopic approach carries half the absolute risk of PPC and, when safe, should be preferentially utilized despite a potential for prolonged operative duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23584820     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2949-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  41 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative pulmonary complications: an update on risk assessment and reduction.

Authors:  Gerald W Smetana
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.321

2.  Mortality after noncardiac surgery: prediction from administrative versus clinical data.

Authors:  Howard S Gordon; Michael L Johnson; Nelda P Wray; Nancy J Petersen; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri; Jane M Geraci
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: What is the price of conversion?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Timothy D Jackson; Jeffrey J Wannares; R Todd Lancaster; David W Rattner; Matthew M Hutter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Association of postoperative complications with hospital costs and length of stay in a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Nadia A Khan; Hude Quan; Jennifer M Bugar; Jane B Lemaire; Rollin Brant; William A Ghali
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay.

Authors:  Levi D Procter; Daniel L Davenport; Andrew C Bernard; Joseph B Zwischenberger
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study.

Authors:  N Pokala; C P Delaney; A J Senagore; K M Brady; V W Fazio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.

Authors:  Steven M Steinberg; Michael R Popa; Judith A Michalek; Matthew J Bethel; E Christopher Ellison
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Evaluating alternative risk-adjustment strategies for surgery.

Authors:  Adam Atherly; Aaron S Fink; Darrell C Campbell; Robert M Mentzer; William Henderson; Shukri Khuri; Steven D Culler
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  18 in total

1.  Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study.

Authors:  Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato; Andrea Coratti; Luigi Bianco; Fabio Caniglia; Andrea Laurenzi; Francesco Puleo; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Gabriella Amorese; Fabio Vistoli; Fabio Caniglia; Nelide De Lio; Vittorio Perrone; Linda Barbarello; Mario Belluomini; Stefano Signori; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Risk factors for pulmonary morbidities after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Uchihara; Naoya Yoshida; Yoshifumi Baba; Taisuke Yagi; Tasuku Toihata; Eri Oda; Daisuke Kuroda; Tsugio Eto; Mayuko Ohuchi; Kenichi Nakamura; Hiroshi Sawayama; Koichi Kinoshita; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Yasuo Sakamoto; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Intravenous lidocaine for effective pain relief after a laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  EunJin Ahn; Hyun Kang; Geun Joo Choi; Yong Hee Park; So Young Yang; Beom Gyu Kim; Seung Won Choi
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-03

5.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse colon cancer.

Authors:  Liying Zhao; Yanan Wang; Hao Liu; Hao Chen; Haijun Deng; Jiang Yu; Qi Xue; Guoxin Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Andrea Balla; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Hernández; Jesús Bollo; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The effects of intravenous lidocaine on wound pain and gastrointestinal function recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Shi Wei; Zhang Yu-Han; Jing Wei-Wei; Yu Hai
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  How do risk factors for mortality and overall complication rates following laparoscopic and open colectomy differ between inpatient and post-discharge phases of care? A retrospective cohort study from NSQIP.

Authors:  Matthew Z Wilson; Peter W Dillon; Christopher S Hollenbeak; David B Stewart
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Patient Risk Factors for Mechanical Wound Complications and Postoperative Infections after Elective Open Intestinal Resection.

Authors:  Wei Chao Chang; Akiva Turner; Michael Imon; Anthony Dyda
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2016-10

10.  Vessel ligation training via an adaptive simulation curriculum.

Authors:  Yinin Hu; Robyn N Goodrich; Ivy A Le; Kendall D Brooks; Robert G Sawyer; Philip W Smith; Anneke T Schroen; Sara K Rasmussen
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.