Lei Yu1, Patricia A Boyle2, Robert S Wilson2, Steven R Levine2, Julie A Schneider2, David A Bennett2. 1. From the Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center (L.Y., P.A.B., R.S.W., J.A.S., D.A.B.), Department of Neurological Sciences (L.Y., R.S.W., J.A.S., D.A.B.), Department of Behavioral Sciences (P.A.B., R.S.W.), and Department of Pathology (J.A.S.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology and Emergency Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn (S.R.L.); and Department of Neurology, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY (S.R.L.). lei_yu@rush.edu. 2. From the Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center (L.Y., P.A.B., R.S.W., J.A.S., D.A.B.), Department of Neurological Sciences (L.Y., R.S.W., J.A.S., D.A.B.), Department of Behavioral Sciences (P.A.B., R.S.W.), and Department of Pathology (J.A.S.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology and Emergency Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn (S.R.L.); and Department of Neurology, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY (S.R.L.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Purpose in life, the sense that life has meaning and direction, is associated with reduced risks of adverse health outcomes. However, it remains unknown whether purpose in life protects against the risk of cerebral infarcts among community-dwelling older people. We tested the hypothesis that greater purpose in life is associated with lower risk of cerebral infarcts. METHODS: Participants came from the Rush Memory and Aging Project. Each participant completed a standard measure of purpose in life. Uniform neuropathologic examination identified macroscopic infarcts and microinfarcts, blinded to clinical information. Association of purpose in life with cerebral infarcts was examined in ordinal logistic regression models using a semiquantitative outcome. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-three participants were included in the analyses. The mean score on the measure of purpose was 3.5 (SD, 0.5; range, 2.1-5.0). Macroscopic infarcts were found in 154 (34.0%) people, and microinfarcts were found in 128 (28.3%) people. Greater purpose in life was associated with a lower odds of having more macroscopic infarcts (odds ratio, 0.535; 95% confidence interval, 0.346-0.826; P=0.005), but we did not find association with microinfarcts (odds ratio, 0.780; 95% confidence interval, 0.495-1.229; P=0.283). These results persisted after adjusting for vascular risk factors of body mass index, history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, and blood pressure, as well as measures of negative affect, physical activity, and clinical stroke. The association with macroscopic infarcts was driven by lacunar infarcts, and was independent of cerebral atherosclerosis and arteriolosclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: Purpose in life may affect risk for cerebral infarcts, specifically macroscopic lacunar infarcts.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Purpose in life, the sense that life has meaning and direction, is associated with reduced risks of adverse health outcomes. However, it remains unknown whether purpose in life protects against the risk of cerebral infarcts among community-dwelling older people. We tested the hypothesis that greater purpose in life is associated with lower risk of cerebral infarcts. METHODS:Participants came from the Rush Memory and Aging Project. Each participant completed a standard measure of purpose in life. Uniform neuropathologic examination identified macroscopic infarcts and microinfarcts, blinded to clinical information. Association of purpose in life with cerebral infarcts was examined in ordinal logistic regression models using a semiquantitative outcome. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-three participants were included in the analyses. The mean score on the measure of purpose was 3.5 (SD, 0.5; range, 2.1-5.0). Macroscopic infarcts were found in 154 (34.0%) people, and microinfarcts were found in 128 (28.3%) people. Greater purpose in life was associated with a lower odds of having more macroscopic infarcts (odds ratio, 0.535; 95% confidence interval, 0.346-0.826; P=0.005), but we did not find association with microinfarcts (odds ratio, 0.780; 95% confidence interval, 0.495-1.229; P=0.283). These results persisted after adjusting for vascular risk factors of body mass index, history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, and blood pressure, as well as measures of negative affect, physical activity, and clinical stroke. The association with macroscopic infarcts was driven by lacunar infarcts, and was independent of cerebral atherosclerosis and arteriolosclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: Purpose in life may affect risk for cerebral infarcts, specifically macroscopic lacunar infarcts.
Authors: Rebecca T Emeny; Astrid Zierer; Maria Elena Lacruz; Jens Baumert; Christian Herder; Gabriele Gornitzka; Wolfgang Koenig; Barbara Thorand; Karl-Heinz Ladwig Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Laura D Kubzansky; Jeff C Huffman; Julia K Boehm; Rosalba Hernandez; Eric S Kim; Hayami K Koga; Emily H Feig; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Martin E P Seligman; Darwin R Labarthe Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sarah Marone; Katherine Bloore; Paola Sebastiani; Christopher Flynn; Brittany Leonard; Kelsey Whitaker; Marilyn Mostowy; Thomas T Perls; Stacy L Andersen Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Ana W Capuano; Bryan D James; Priscilla Amofa; Zoe Arvanitakis; Raj Shah; David A Bennett; Patricia A Boyle Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Aliza P Wingo; Thomas S Wingo; Wen Fan; Sharon Bergquist; Alvaro Alonso; Michele Marcus; Allan I Levey; James J Lah Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2019-11-30 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Steven W Cole; Morgan E Levine; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Jeffrey Ma; David R Weir; Eileen M Crimmins Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Patricia A Boyle; Lisa L Barnes; Robert S Wilson; Julie A Schneider Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472