Aliza P Wingo1, Thomas S Wingo2, Wen Fan2, Sharon Bergquist3, Alvaro Alonso4, Michele Marcus4, Allan I Levey2, James J Lah2. 1. Division of Mental Health, Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: Aliza.wingo@emory.edu. 2. Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, GA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive abilities tend to decline in advanced age. A novel protective factor of cognitive decline in advanced age is purpose-in-life (PiL), a trait-like tendency to derive life meanings and purpose. However, whether PiL protects against cognitive decline in late-middle-age is unclear. Hence, we examined the association between PiL and perceived cognitive decline, one of the earliest detectable cognitive symptoms before the onset of cognitive impairment. Furthermore, we used a machine learning approach to investigate whether PiL is a robust predictor of cognitive decline when considered with the known protective and risk factors for cognition. METHODS: PiL was assessed with a 10-item questionnaire and perceived cognitive decline with the Cognitive Function Instrument among 5,441 Emory Healthy Aging Study participants, whose mean age was 63 and 51% were employed. Association between PiL and perceived cognitive decline was examined with linear regression adjusting for relevant confounding factors. Elastic Net was performed to identify the most robust predictors of cognitive decline. RESULTS: Greater PiL was associated with less perceived cognitive decline after adjusting for the relevant factors. Furthermore, Elastic Net modeling suggested that PiL is a robust predictor of cognitive decline when considered simultaneously with known protective (education, exercise, enrichment activities) and risk factors for cognition (depression, anxiety, diagnosed medical, mental health problems, smoking, alcohol use, family history of dementia, and others). LIMITATION: This is a cross-sectional study. CONCLUSIONS: PiL is a robust protective factor of perceived cognitive decline observed as early as middle age. Thus, interventions to enhance PiL merit further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive abilities tend to decline in advanced age. A novel protective factor of cognitive decline in advanced age is purpose-in-life (PiL), a trait-like tendency to derive life meanings and purpose. However, whether PiL protects against cognitive decline in late-middle-age is unclear. Hence, we examined the association between PiL and perceived cognitive decline, one of the earliest detectable cognitive symptoms before the onset of cognitive impairment. Furthermore, we used a machine learning approach to investigate whether PiL is a robust predictor of cognitive decline when considered with the known protective and risk factors for cognition. METHODS:PiL was assessed with a 10-item questionnaire and perceived cognitive decline with the Cognitive Function Instrument among 5,441 Emory Healthy Aging Study participants, whose mean age was 63 and 51% were employed. Association between PiL and perceived cognitive decline was examined with linear regression adjusting for relevant confounding factors. Elastic Net was performed to identify the most robust predictors of cognitive decline. RESULTS: Greater PiL was associated with less perceived cognitive decline after adjusting for the relevant factors. Furthermore, Elastic Net modeling suggested that PiL is a robust predictor of cognitive decline when considered simultaneously with known protective (education, exercise, enrichment activities) and risk factors for cognition (depression, anxiety, diagnosed medical, mental health problems, smoking, alcohol use, family history of dementia, and others). LIMITATION: This is a cross-sectional study. CONCLUSIONS:PiL is a robust protective factor of perceived cognitive decline observed as early as middle age. Thus, interventions to enhance PiL merit further investigation.
Authors: David W Kissane; Carrie Lethborg; Joanne Brooker; Courtney Hempton; Sue Burney; Natasha Michael; Margaret Staples; Tanya Osicka; Merlina Sulistio; Jeremy Shapiro; Hilary Hiscock Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2019-01-02
Authors: Kurt Kroenke; Tara W Strine; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Joyce T Berry; Ali H Mokdad Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2008-08-27 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Rosemary A Abbott; George B Ploubidis; Felicia A Huppert; Diana Kuh; Michael E J Wadsworth; Tim J Croudace Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2006-10-04 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Zhenjiang Li; Grace M Christensen; James J Lah; Michele Marcus; Armistead G Russell; Stefanie Ebelt; Lance A Waller; Anke Hüls Journal: Environ Res Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 8.431
Authors: Mayra L Estrella; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Linda C Gallo; Wassim Tarraf; Carmen R Isasi; Krista M Perreira; Donglin Zeng; Maria J Marquine; Richard B Lipton; Hector M González; Martha L Daviglus; Melissa Lamar Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Cristina García; Lucrecia Moreno; Mónica Alacreu; Francisco J Muñoz; Luis A Martínez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-10-09 Impact factor: 4.614