Steven W Cole1, Morgan E Levine2, Jesusa M G Arevalo2, Jeffrey Ma2, David R Weir3, Eileen M Crimmins4. 1. David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: steve.cole@ucla.edu. 2. David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 3. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic social adversity activates a conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA) marked by increased expression of pro-inflammatory genes and decreased expression of antiviral- and antibody-related genes. Recent findings suggest that some psychological resilience factors may help buffer CTRA activation, but the relative impact of resilience and adversity factors remains poorly understood. Here we examined the relative strength of CTRA association for the two best-established psychological correlates of CTRA gene expression-the risk factor of perceived social isolation (loneliness) and the resilience factor of eudaimonic well-being (purpose and meaning in life). METHODS: Peripheral blood samples and validated measures of loneliness and eudaimonic well-being were analyzed in 108 community-dwelling older adults participating in the longitudinal US Health and Retirement Study (56% female, mean age 73). Mixed effect linear model analyses quantified the strength of association between CTRA gene expression and measures of loneliness and eudaimonic well-being in separate and joint analyses. RESULTS: As in previous studies, separate analyses found CTRA gene expression to be up-regulated in association with loneliness and down-regulated in association with eudaimonic well-being. In joint analyses, effects of loneliness were completely abrogated whereas eudaimonic well-being continued to associate with CTRA down-regulation. Similar eudaimonia-dominant effects were observed for positive and negative affect, optimism and pessimism, and anxiety symptoms. All results were independent of demographic and behavioral health risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Eudaimonic well-being may have the potential to compensate for the adverse impact of loneliness on CTRA gene expression. Findings suggest a novel approach to targeting the health risks associated with social isolation by promoting purpose and meaning in life.
BACKGROUND: Chronic social adversity activates a conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA) marked by increased expression of pro-inflammatory genes and decreased expression of antiviral- and antibody-related genes. Recent findings suggest that some psychological resilience factors may help buffer CTRA activation, but the relative impact of resilience and adversity factors remains poorly understood. Here we examined the relative strength of CTRA association for the two best-established psychological correlates of CTRA gene expression-the risk factor of perceived social isolation (loneliness) and the resilience factor of eudaimonic well-being (purpose and meaning in life). METHODS: Peripheral blood samples and validated measures of loneliness and eudaimonic well-being were analyzed in 108 community-dwelling older adults participating in the longitudinal US Health and Retirement Study (56% female, mean age 73). Mixed effect linear model analyses quantified the strength of association between CTRA gene expression and measures of loneliness and eudaimonic well-being in separate and joint analyses. RESULTS: As in previous studies, separate analyses found CTRA gene expression to be up-regulated in association with loneliness and down-regulated in association with eudaimonic well-being. In joint analyses, effects of loneliness were completely abrogated whereas eudaimonic well-being continued to associate with CTRA down-regulation. Similar eudaimonia-dominant effects were observed for positive and negative affect, optimism and pessimism, and anxiety symptoms. All results were independent of demographic and behavioral health risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Eudaimonic well-being may have the potential to compensate for the adverse impact of loneliness on CTRA gene expression. Findings suggest a novel approach to targeting the health risks associated with social isolation by promoting purpose and meaning in life.
Authors: Amanda Sonnega; Jessica D Faul; Mary Beth Ofstedal; Kenneth M Langa; John W R Phillips; David R Weir Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Michael R Irwin; Richard Olmstead; Elizabeth C Breen; Tuff Witarama; Carmen Carrillo; Nina Sadeghi; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Jeffrey Ma; Perry Nicassio; Patricia A Ganz; Julienne E Bower; Steve Cole Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2014-11
Authors: Jenny Tung; Luis B Barreiro; Zachary P Johnson; Kasper D Hansen; Vasiliki Michopoulos; Donna Toufexis; Katelyn Michelini; Mark E Wilson; Yoav Gilad Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: John T Cacioppo; Stephanie Cacioppo; Steven W Cole; John P Capitanio; Luc Goossens; Dorret I Boomsma Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci Date: 2015-03
Authors: Barbara L Fredrickson; Karen M Grewen; Kimberly A Coffey; Sara B Algoe; Ann M Firestine; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Jeffrey Ma; Steven W Cole Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nicole D Powell; Erica K Sloan; Michael T Bailey; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Gregory E Miller; Edith Chen; Michael S Kobor; Brenda F Reader; John F Sheridan; Steven W Cole Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kate Walsh; Clare A McCormack; Rachel Webster; Anita Pinto; Seonjoo Lee; Tianshu Feng; H Sloan Krakovsky; Sinclaire M O'Grady; Benjamin Tycko; Frances A Champagne; Elizabeth A Werner; Grace Liu; Catherine Monk Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Brandon A Kohrt; Carol M Worthman; Ramesh P Adhikari; Nagendra P Luitel; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Jeffrey Ma; Heather McCreath; Teresa E Seeman; Eileen M Crimmins; Steven W Cole Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephanie Shiau; Alexis A Bender; Jane A O'Halloran; Erin Sundermann; Juhi Aggarwal; Keri N Althoff; Jason V Baker; Steven Deeks; Linda P Fried; Stephen Karpiak; Maile Y Karris; Thomas D Marcotte; Jean B Nachega; Joseph B Margolick; Kristine M Erlandson; David J Moore Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Devika R Jutagir; Bonnie B Blomberg; Charles S Carver; Suzanne C Lechner; Kiara R Timpano; Laura C Bouchard; Lisa M Gudenkauf; Jamie M Jacobs; Alain Diaz; Susan K Lutgendorf; Steve W Cole; Aaron S Heller; Michael H Antoni Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jeffrey G Snodgrass; Michael G Lacy; H J François Dengah; Evan R Polzer; Robert J Else; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Steven W Cole Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 7.217