Literature DB >> 25789690

The locus of sexual selection: moving sexual selection studies into the post-genomics era.

G S Wilkinson1, F Breden, J E Mank, M G Ritchie, A D Higginson, J Radwan, J Jaquiery, W Salzburger, E Arriero, S M Barribeau, P C Phillips, S C P Renn, L Rowe.   

Abstract

Sexual selection drives fundamental evolutionary processes such as trait elaboration and speciation. Despite this importance, there are surprisingly few examples of genes unequivocally responsible for variation in sexually selected phenotypes. This lack of information inhibits our ability to predict phenotypic change due to universal behaviours, such as fighting over mates and mate choice. Here, we discuss reasons for this apparent gap and provide recommendations for how it can be overcome by adopting contemporary genomic methods, exploiting underutilized taxa that may be ideal for detecting the effects of sexual selection and adopting appropriate experimental paradigms. Identifying genes that determine variation in sexually selected traits has the potential to improve theoretical models and reveal whether the genetic changes underlying phenotypic novelty utilize common or unique molecular mechanisms. Such a genomic approach to sexual selection will help answer questions in the evolution of sexually selected phenotypes that were first asked by Darwin and can furthermore serve as a model for the application of genomics in all areas of evolutionary biology.
© 2015 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2015 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Keywords:  candidate gene; cis-regulation; forward genetics; genomewide association studies; resequencing; reverse genetics; transcriptome

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25789690     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  21 in total

1.  Genomic Signatures of Sexual Conflict.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Thomas C Nelson; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  ISSR markers for gender identification and genetic diagnosis of Hippophae rhamnoides ssp. turkestanica growing at high altitudes in Ladakh region (Jammu and Kashmir).

Authors:  Kamal Das; Showkat Hussain Ganie; Yash Mangla; Tanvir-Ul-Hassan Dar; Manju Chaudhary; Rakesh Kumar Thakur; Rajesh Tandon; S N Raina; Shailendra Goel
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.356

3.  Protein-Level Interactions as Mediators of Sexual Conflict in Ants.

Authors:  Ryan Dosselli; Julia Grassl; Susanne P A den Boer; Madlen Kratz; Jessica M Moran; Jacobus J Boomsma; Boris Baer
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  A masculinizing supergene underlies an exaggerated male reproductive morph in a spider.

Authors:  Frederik Hendrickx; Zoë De Corte; Gontran Sonet; Steven M Van Belleghem; Stephan Köstlbacher; Carl Vangestel
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 19.100

5.  Genetic conflict between sexual signalling and juvenile survival in the three-spined stickleback.

Authors:  Sin-Yeon Kim; Alberto Velando
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Intrinsic differences between males and females determine sex-specific consequences of inbreeding.

Authors:  Emily R Ebel; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Genetic Architecture of Conspicuous Red Ornaments in Female Threespine Stickleback.

Authors:  Lengxob Yong; Catherine L Peichel; Jeffrey S McKinnon
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Profiling of Human Molecular Pathways Affected by Retrotransposons at the Level of Regulation by Transcription Factor Proteins.

Authors:  Daniil Nikitin; Dmitry Penzar; Andrew Garazha; Maxim Sorokin; Victor Tkachev; Nicolas Borisov; Alexander Poltorak; Vladimir Prassolov; Anton A Buzdin
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Genomic Environment Impacts Color Vision Evolution in a Family with Visually Based Sexual Selection.

Authors:  Benjamin A Sandkam; Jeffrey B Joy; Corey T Watson; Felix Breden
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Interspecies Behavioral Variability of Medaka Fish Assessed by Comparative Phenomics.

Authors:  Gilbert Audira; Petrus Siregar; Kelvin H-C Chen; Marri Jmelou M Roldan; Jong-Chin Huang; Hong-Thih Lai; Chung-Der Hsiao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.