Literature DB >> 34949821

A masculinizing supergene underlies an exaggerated male reproductive morph in a spider.

Frederik Hendrickx1,2, Zoë De Corte3, Gontran Sonet3, Steven M Van Belleghem4, Stephan Köstlbacher5,6, Carl Vangestel3,7.   

Abstract

In many species, individuals can develop into strikingly different morphs, which are determined by a simple Mendelian locus. How selection shapes loci that control complex phenotypic differences remains poorly understood. In the spider Oedothorax gibbosus, males develop either into a 'hunched' morph with conspicuous head structures or as a fast-developing 'flat' morph with a female-like appearance. We show that the hunched-determining allele contains a unique genomic fragment of approximately 3 megabases that is absent in the flat-determining allele. This fragment comprises dozens of genes that duplicated from genes found at the same as well as different chromosomes. All functional duplicates, including a duplicate of the key sexual differentiation regulatory gene doublesex, show male-specific expression, which illustrates their integrated role as a masculinizing supergene. Our findings demonstrate how extensive indel polymorphisms and duplications of regulatory genes may contribute to the evolution of co-adapted gene clusters, sex-limited reproductive morphs and the enigmatic evolution of exaggerated sexual traits in general.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34949821     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01626-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   19.100


  45 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of sex chromosomes.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Supergenes and complex phenotypes.

Authors:  Tanja Schwander; Romain Libbrecht; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  A genetic mechanism for female-limited Batesian mimicry in Papilio butterfly.

Authors:  Hideki Nishikawa; Takuro Iijima; Rei Kajitani; Junichi Yamaguchi; Toshiya Ando; Yutaka Suzuki; Sumio Sugano; Asao Fujiyama; Shunichi Kosugi; Hideki Hirakawa; Satoshi Tabata; Katsuhisa Ozaki; Hiroya Morimoto; Kunio Ihara; Madoka Obara; Hiroshi Hori; Takehiko Itoh; Haruhiko Fujiwara
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Divergence and Functional Degradation of a Sex Chromosome-like Supergene.

Authors:  Elaina M Tuttle; Alan O Bergland; Marisa L Korody; Michael S Brewer; Daniel J Newhouse; Patrick Minx; Maria Stager; Adam Betuel; Zachary A Cheviron; Wesley C Warren; Rusty A Gonser; Christopher N Balakrishnan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  doublesex is a mimicry supergene.

Authors:  K Kunte; W Zhang; A Tenger-Trolander; D H Palmer; A Martin; R D Reed; S P Mullen; M R Kronforst
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Structural genomic changes underlie alternative reproductive strategies in the ruff (Philomachus pugnax).

Authors:  Sangeet Lamichhaney; Guangyi Fan; Fredrik Widemo; Ulrika Gunnarsson; Doreen Schwochow Thalmann; Marc P Hoeppner; Susanne Kerje; Ulla Gustafson; Chengcheng Shi; He Zhang; Wenbin Chen; Xinming Liang; Leihuan Huang; Jiahao Wang; Enjing Liang; Qiong Wu; Simon Ming-Yuen Lee; Xun Xu; Jacob Höglund; Xin Liu; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry.

Authors:  Mathieu Joron; Lise Frezal; Robert T Jones; Nicola L Chamberlain; Siu F Lee; Christoph R Haag; Annabel Whibley; Michel Becuwe; Simon W Baxter; Laura Ferguson; Paul A Wilkinson; Camilo Salazar; Claire Davidson; Richard Clark; Michael A Quail; Helen Beasley; Rebecca Glithero; Christine Lloyd; Sarah Sims; Matthew C Jones; Jane Rogers; Chris D Jiggins; Richard H ffrench-Constant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Supergenes and their role in evolution.

Authors:  M J Thompson; C D Jiggins
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  A supergene determines highly divergent male reproductive morphs in the ruff.

Authors:  Clemens Küpper; Michael Stocks; Judith E Risse; Natalie Dos Remedios; Lindsay L Farrell; Susan B McRae; Tawna C Morgan; Natalia Karlionova; Pavel Pinchuk; Yvonne I Verkuil; Alexander S Kitaysky; John C Wingfield; Theunis Piersma; Kai Zeng; Jon Slate; Mark Blaxter; David B Lank; Terry Burke
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  3 in total

1.  Genomic evidence that a sexually selected trait captures genome-wide variation and facilitates the purging of genetic load.

Authors:  Jonathan M Parrett; Sebastian Chmielewski; Eylem Aydogdu; Aleksandra Łukasiewicz; Stephane Rombauts; Agnieszka Szubert-Kruszyńska; Wiesław Babik; Mateusz Konczal; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 19.100

Review 2.  Sex-specific morphs: the genetics and evolution of intra-sexual variation.

Authors:  Judith E Mank
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 59.581

3.  Ecological basis and genetic architecture of crypsis polymorphism in the desert clicker grasshopper (Ligurotettix coquilletti).

Authors:  Timothy K O'Connor; Marissa C Sandoval; Jiarui Wang; Jacob C Hans; Risa Takenaka; Myron Child; Noah K Whiteman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.694

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.