| Literature DB >> 25787915 |
E K Mai1, U Bertsch1, J Dürig2, C Kunz3, M Haenel4, I W Blau5, M Munder6, A Jauch7, B Schurich8, T Hielscher3, M Merz9, B Huegle-Doerr1, A Seckinger1, D Hose1, J Hillengass9, M S Raab9, K Neben9, H-W Lindemann10, M Zeis11, C Gerecke12, I G H Schmidt-Wolf13, K Weisel14, C Scheid15, H Salwender16, H Goldschmidt1.
Abstract
We aimed at demonstrating non-inferiority of bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone (VCD) compared to bortezomib/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (PAd) induction therapy with respect to very good partial response rates or better (⩾VGPR) in 504 newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients. VCD was found to be non-inferior to PAd with respect to ⩾VGPR rates (37.0 versus 34.3%, P=0.001). The rates of progressive disease (PD) were 0.4% (VCD) versus 4.8% (PAd; P=0.003). In the PAd arm, 11 of 12 patients with PD had either renal impairment (creatinine ⩾2 mg/dl) at diagnosis or the cytogenetic abnormality gain 1q21, whereas no PD was observed in these subgroups in the VCD arm. Leukocytopenia/neutropenia (⩾3°) occurred more frequently in the VCD arm (35.2% versus 11.3%, P<0.001). Neuropathy rates (⩾2°) were higher in the PAd group (14.9 versus 8.4%, P=0.03). Serious adverse events, both overall and those related to thromboembolic events, were higher in the PAd group (32.7 versus 24.0%, P=0.04 and 2.8 versus 0.4%, P=0.04). Stem cell collection was not impeded by VCD. VCD is as effective as PAd in terms of achieving ⩾VGPR rates with fewer PD and has a favorable toxicity profile. Therefore, VCD is preferable to PAd as induction therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25787915 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2015.80
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leukemia ISSN: 0887-6924 Impact factor: 11.528