Literature DB >> 25784698

Novel type III effectors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

David Burstein1, Shirley Satanower, Michal Simovitch, Yana Belnik, Meital Zehavi, Gal Yerushalmi, Shay Ben-Aroya2, Tal Pupko3, Ehud Banin4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative, opportunistic pathogen that causes chronic and acute infections in immunocompromised patients. Most P. aeruginosa strains encode an active type III secretion system (T3SS), utilized by the bacteria to deliver effector proteins from the bacterial cell directly into the cytoplasm of the host cell. Four T3SS effectors have been discovered and extensively studied in P. aeruginosa: ExoT, ExoS, ExoU, and ExoY. This is especially intriguing in light of P. aeruginosa's ability to infect a wide range of hosts. We therefore hypothesized that additional T3SS effectors that have not yet been discovered are encoded in the genome of P. aeruginosa. Here, we applied a machine learning classification algorithm to identify novel P. aeruginosa effectors. In this approach, various types of data are integrated to differentiate effectors from the rest of the open reading frames of the bacterial genome. Due to the lack of a sufficient learning set of positive effectors, our machine learning algorithm integrated genomic information from another Pseudomonas species and utilized dozens of features accounting for various aspects of the effector coding genes and their products. Twelve top-ranking predictions were experimentally tested for T3SS-specific translocation, leading to the discovery of two novel T3SS effectors. We demonstrate that these effectors are not part of the injection structural complex and report initial efforts toward their characterization. IMPORTANCE: Pseudomonas aeruginosa uses a type III secretion system (T3SS) to secrete toxic proteins, termed effectors, directly into the cytoplasm of the host cell. The activation of this secretion system is correlated with disease severity and patient death. Compared with many other T3SS-utilizing pathogenic bacteria, P. aeruginosa has a fairly limited arsenal of effectors that have been identified. This is in sharp contrast with the wide range of hosts that this bacterium can infect. The discovery of two novel effectors described here is an important step toward better understanding of the virulence and host evasion mechanisms adopted by this versatile pathogen and may provide novel approaches to treat P. aeruginosa infections.
Copyright © 2015 Burstein et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25784698      PMCID: PMC4453518          DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00161-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MBio            Impact factor:   7.867


Observation

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an extremely versatile, Gram-negative bacterial pathogen that is a major cause of health care-associated infections, especially among immunocompromised individuals (1). Most P. aeruginosa strains express a highly detrimental type III secretion system (T3SS), which is used to deliver toxins, termed effectors, directly into the cytoplasm of infected host cells (2). A clinical study that investigated the involvement of an active T3SS in human infections showed a high correlation between T3SS expression in clinical P. aeruginosa strains and patient death (3). In the lab, studies have shown that P. aeruginosa T3SS mutants display attenuated virulence toward various hosts (4). Extensive research into the T3SS of P. aeruginosa revealed only four effectors: ExoS, ExoU, ExoT, and ExoY (2). Recently, it was reported that nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDK) is also translocated into host cells in a type III-dependent manner (5). This limited number of effectors is especially intriguing in light of P. aeruginosa’s ability to infect a very wide range of hosts (6). Furthermore, it has been shown that a P. aeruginosa strain lacking all known effectors is still virulent during acute lung infection (7). This observation may suggest the involvement of the T3SS injection machinery itself in virulence. However, it may also point to the existence of other, yet-undiscovered, T3SS effector proteins that are encoded in the genome of P. aeruginosa. Recently, we and others have used machine learning classification algorithms to identify effectors of different secretion systems (8–12). These algorithms can integrate various types of data (such as regulatory information, GC content, amino acid content, phylogenomic information) to differentiate effectors from the rest of the open reading frames (ORFs) in the bacterial genome. In our previous study (9), experimental validation proved the ability of such machine learning approaches to accurately identify type IVB effectors of the human intracellular pathogen Legionella pneumophila. Here we further developed and applied our machine learning tools to predict novel type III effectors in P. aeruginosa. Experimental validation of our predictions has led to the discovery of two novel T3SS effectors. In light of the very small number of previously characterized effectors, the current increase in the number of known type III effectors may have a direct impact on our understanding of P. aeruginosa virulence mechanisms. In this study, we searched for novel T3SS effectors in P. aeruginosa. We applied a set of machine learning classification algorithms to distinguish effectors from non-effectors among all ORFs in this bacterium, based on various features characterizing effectors. As four ORFs (representing the known effectors) are not enough to enable such learning, we augmented the training set with (i) additional P. aeruginosa proteins that are secreted via the type III apparatus, including structural proteins and putative secreted regulators, and (ii) effectors from Pseudomonas syringae, a phylogenetically related plant pathogen that also harbors a T3SS and has 37 validated effectors in its genome (13). The list of ORFs used as a positive training set is provided in Table S1A in the supplemental material. We trained four different machine learning classifiers, Support Vector Machine (SVM), naive Bayes, Bayesian networks, and random forest, based on a variety of features, such as regulatory information, amino acid properties, GC content, and phylogenomic information. For each ORF, our prediction score is a weighted combination of the scores yielded by the four classifiers in which the weight is assigned according to the estimated performances of the classifiers on the training set (see Fig. S1 and below). The results provide a ranked list of predicted effectors. Top putative effectors are presented in Table S2. We experimentally tested the 12 top-ranking predictions for translocation into HeLa cells. The genes were fused to β-lactamase (BlaM) and transformed into the P. aeruginosa strain that does not express the three known toxins (Δ3tox strain). As a control, and to verify that the putative effectors are secreted by the T3SS, the plasmids were also transformed into the P. aeruginosa Δ3tox ΔpscJ and Δ3tox ΔpopB strains, which have a nonfunctional T3SS (Fig. 1a and Fig. S2A, respectively). The known effectors ExoS and ExoY fused to BlaM were used as positive controls (Fig. 1a and S2A, respectively). Using this approach, we discovered two novel effectors, PA14_16720 and PA14_44480, which are translocated in a T3SS-dependent manner (Fig. 1a and S2A). We term these effectors pemA and pemB (for Pseudomonas effectors discovered by machine learning), respectively. The rest of the putative effectors did not show any translocation into HeLa cells and thus are most likely not T3SS effectors (Fig. S2B). To investigate the possibility that the two novel effectors are structural components of the T3SS, we deleted the pemA and pemB genes in P. aeruginosa (ΔpemA ΔpemB) and tested the translocation of ExoY from this strain into HeLa cells. We found that neither of the genes is an essential component of the T3SS, as ExoY was efficiently translocated in the absence of the two effectors (Fig. 1b).
FIG 1 

(a) Two new putative effectors are translocated into HeLa cells. (Top row) HeLa cells were infected with Δ3tox strains (active T3SS) or Δ3tox ΔpscJ strains (nonactive T3SS) expressing either unfused BlaM, ExoS, or two putative effectors (PemA and PemB) fused to BlaM. Cells stained in blue indicate successful translocation of BlaM fused to the bacterial effector. Green cells indicate no translocation (×10 magnification). (b) The two new effectors are not essential structural components of the T3SS machinery. HeLa cells were infected with a P. aeruginosa strain lacking the known effectors (Δ3tox), a strain which has a nonfunctional T3SS (Δ3tox ΔpscJ), or strains with deletions of the putative genes pemA, pemB, or both (Δ3tox ΔpemA, Δ3tox ΔpemB, or Δ3tox ΔpemA ΔpemB) expressing ExoY fused to BlaM. Cells stained in blue indicate successful translocation of BlaM fused to the bacterial effector. Green cells indicate no translocation (×20 magnification).

(a) Two new putative effectors are translocated into HeLa cells. (Top row) HeLa cells were infected with Δ3tox strains (active T3SS) or Δ3tox ΔpscJ strains (nonactive T3SS) expressing either unfused BlaM, ExoS, or two putative effectors (PemA and PemB) fused to BlaM. Cells stained in blue indicate successful translocation of BlaM fused to the bacterial effector. Green cells indicate no translocation (×10 magnification). (b) The two new effectors are not essential structural components of the T3SS machinery. HeLa cells were infected with a P. aeruginosa strain lacking the known effectors (Δ3tox), a strain which has a nonfunctional T3SS (Δ3tox ΔpscJ), or strains with deletions of the putative genes pemA, pemB, or both (Δ3tox ΔpemA, Δ3tox ΔpemB, or Δ3tox ΔpemA ΔpemB) expressing ExoY fused to BlaM. Cells stained in blue indicate successful translocation of BlaM fused to the bacterial effector. Green cells indicate no translocation (×20 magnification). A sequence similarity search against reference sequences in the NCBI database (RefSeq) revealed that both pemA and pemB have conserved orthologs in members of the Pseudomonas genus (Fig. S3). We specifically determined the presence of pemA and pemB orthologs in 13 sequenced strains of P. aeruginosa (14). Both effectors were found in all strains. This is similar to the prevalence of exoT and exoY, which are present in 12 out of the 13 strains (Table S3). It is important to note that the two novel effectors were also located in two strains lacking homologs to essential T3SS components (P. aeruginosa PA7 and PA-RP73). The presence of effectors in genomes lacking an active T3SS is not unique for pemA and pemB; PA-RP73 also encodes exoT, exoS, and exoY. This puzzling observation may reflect an ongoing evolutionary process of T3SS being lost from these genomes; essential T3SS components are already lost, whereas the effector genes, although nonfunctional, still reside in the genome. Alternatively, these effectors may have additional functions not related to the secretion system. Notably, none of the pemA or pemB orthologs that we found were annotated. No distant homologs of these genes were found following PSI-BLAST (15) and HHpred (16) searches, suggesting that these are Pseudomonas-specific genes. Inspection of the genomic context of the newly discovered effectors suggested that pemA is part of an operon together with PA14_16730, a hypothetical protein whose gene has a start codon 18 bp downstream of pemA. This operon structure is conserved across various Pseudomonas species (including P. aeruginosa, P. syringae, and P. fluorescens). The pemB gene resides between genes encoding coproporphyrinogen III oxidase (hemN, part of the heme pathway) and anr, encoding an anaerobic regulatory protein. It is in an orientation opposite to that of these genes and probably not related to them in function. We identified in PemB a conserved coiled-coil domain (located at amino acids 78 to 140 [Fig. S3]) and an ExsA binding site in its regulatory region. ExsA is the principal regulator of P. aeruginosa type III secretion gene expression. The ExsA footprint that we identified is highly similar to that of the ExsA binding site in the known T3SS-associated genes popN, exoT, exoU, and exoY (Fig. S4). The presence of a coiled-coil domain and the ExsA binding motif further suggests the involvement of this effector in T3SS-associated activity (2, 17). All previously known effectors of P. aeruginosa, ExoS, ExoT, ExoU, and ExoY, elicit a toxic response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (7, 18–20), and ExoS and ExoU are also toxic to cultured human cells (5, 7). We hence tested whether pemA and pemB affect host cell viability in a human cell line and in S. cerevisiae. We infected HeLa cells with P. aeruginosa Δ3tox lacking either pemA, pemB, or both and assessed host cell viability using a homogeneous membrane integrity assay. Neither gene was cytotoxic to HeLa cells (Fig. 2a). Cytotoxicity toward HeLa cells was also not affected when pemA and pemB were ectopically overexpressed (Fig. S6). In addition, the expression of the two newly identified effector genes in S. cerevisiae did not affect host cell viability (Fig. 2b). To investigate the involvement of certain stress pathways in S. cerevisiae’s response to the two bacterial effectors, we conducted growth assays in the presence of various known stress agents, including sorbitol, NaCl, caffeine, tunicamycin, and a temperature of 37°C (21). The results, presented in Fig. 2b, show that the presence of stress agents also did not elicit a toxic response in S. cerevisiae expressing the pemA and pemB genes. The lack of a toxicity phenotype in our tests may indicate that the toxicity of the two genes is restricted to a small group of specific host cell types or triggered by yet-undefined signals. Alternatively, these effectors may not have a toxic effect; rather, they may interact with the host’s innate immunity or regulate specific host pathways for the benefit of the bacteria. Clearly, our findings open the way to further research aimed at deciphering the functions and mechanisms of these newly discovered effectors.
FIG 2 

(a) The two new effectors are not cytotoxic to HeLa cells. HeLa cells were infected with wild-type P. aeruginosa or the Δ3tox or Δ3tox ΔpscJ strain and three strains lacking one (Δ3tox ΔpemA or Δ3tox ΔpemB) or both (Δ3tox ΔpemA ΔpemB) of the newly discovered effectors. Cytotoxicity was assessed by the CytoTox-ONE homogeneous membrane integrity assay after 4 h of infection. Three biological repeats were performed in duplicate. Expression of the effectors under these conditions was validated (see Fig. S5A in the supplemental material). None of the strains showed a significant change in cytotoxicity according to the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. (b) Expression of the two new effectors does not affect the growth of S. cerevisiae. pemA and pemB were expressed from the GAL10 promoter in S. cerevisiae BY4741. Growth was assessed by a yeast spotting assay. One molar sorbitol, 7 mM caffeine, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.12 µg/ml tunicamycin, and growth at 37°C were used to assess the growth effects of the effectors under various stress conditions. S. cerevisiae expressing the Legionella toxic effector lpg2975 and the empty vector pGREG523-Km were used as controls. Three biological repeats were performed. Effector expression was validated by Western blotting (Fig. S6B).

(a) The two new effectors are not cytotoxic to HeLa cells. HeLa cells were infected with wild-type P. aeruginosa or the Δ3tox or Δ3tox ΔpscJ strain and three strains lacking one (Δ3tox ΔpemA or Δ3tox ΔpemB) or both (Δ3tox ΔpemA ΔpemB) of the newly discovered effectors. Cytotoxicity was assessed by the CytoTox-ONE homogeneous membrane integrity assay after 4 h of infection. Three biological repeats were performed in duplicate. Expression of the effectors under these conditions was validated (see Fig. S5A in the supplemental material). None of the strains showed a significant change in cytotoxicity according to the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. (b) Expression of the two new effectors does not affect the growth of S. cerevisiae. pemA and pemB were expressed from the GAL10 promoter in S. cerevisiae BY4741. Growth was assessed by a yeast spotting assay. One molar sorbitol, 7 mM caffeine, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.12 µg/ml tunicamycin, and growth at 37°C were used to assess the growth effects of the effectors under various stress conditions. S. cerevisiae expressing the Legionella toxic effector lpg2975 and the empty vector pGREG523-Km were used as controls. Three biological repeats were performed. Effector expression was validated by Western blotting (Fig. S6B).

Genome sequences.

The genomic sequence of P. aeruginosa PA14 (NCBI accession number NC_008463) and the sequences of the P. syringae DC3000 chromosome and plasmids (NCBI accession numbers NC_004578, NC_004632, and NC_004633) were downloaded from the NCBI genome FTP site.

Classifier training sets.

The classification of ORFs as either effectors or non-effectors requires a training set that serves to identify properties that characterize effectors and differentiate them from the rest of the ORFs encoded by the bacteria. In P. aeruginosa PA14, only three effectors have been identified to date. Such a limited set of effectors is insufficient for reliable classification. Therefore, we added to the training set additional P. aeruginosa proteins that are secreted via the T3SS, as well as known effectors of P. syringae, a closely related species of Pseudomonas that also utilizes a T3SS to translocate effectors. In total, the effector training set consisted of 50 effectors, which are specified in Table S1A in the supplemental material. For the noneffector set, we used all the ORFs of P. aeruginosa and P. syringae that were not part of the effector set. This ensures that no bias is introduced while choosing the negative set. Few of the ORFs in the negative set are expected to be effectors; hence, the performance estimations are conservative (a lower bound of the actual performances). An ORF is considered a putative effector if the classification scheme challenges its assignment to the non-effector set, predicting that it has a high likelihood of being part of the effector set. Highly similar ORFs used in the training set might introduce biases into the classification and estimation procedures. As we used ORFs from two closely related bacteria, the training set is expected to contain a high number of orthologous proteins in addition to the paralogs existing in each of the species. To reduce the redundancy, we filtered out ORFs with a BLAST E-value lower than 0.01 in favor of an ORF already in the training set (when applicable, we filtered out P. syringae rather than P. aeruginosa ORFs). Classifiers use different attributes or features that were measured for each instance of the training set to perform the classification. Various features were measured for each ORF in the data set. Table S1B specifies the full list of 166 features used in this study and the importance score of each feature, as measured by the random forest classifier.

Classification scheme.

The classification scheme is an extension of our previously developed methodology described in detail in reference 9. The same classification algorithms were used, except for the multilayer perceptron classifier, which was replaced with the random forest classifier (22), which consistently displayed superior performance. The classification performance of each classifier was calculated by a mean area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) over 10-fold cross-validation. It should be noted that the data serving as a test set were excluded from the feature selection stage to ensure that the evaluation process was performed with unseen data. The final prediction scores were achieved by computing a weighted mean of the results with the four classifiers, with their performances as weights. The AUPRC values were calculated with AUCCalculator 0.2 (23). For random forests, we used the R implementation (24), and the rest of the machine learning analysis was implemented in Java by using the open-source package Weka, version 3.7.0 (25).

Strains, plasmids, and growth medium.

The list of the bacterial/yeast strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S4 in the supplemental material. For infection, overnight cultures of P. aeruginosa were grown in MINS medium (25 mM KH2PO4, 95 mM NH4Cl, 50 mM monosodium glutamate, 110 mM disodium succinate, 10 mM trisodium nitrilotriacetic acid, 2.5% glycerol, 5 mM MgSO4, 18 µM FeSO4) at 37°C overnight, diluted the next morning, and grown to exponential phase. HeLa cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Where indicated, modified Casamino Acids-DMEM (cDMEM) [0.25 µM Fe(NO3)3, 1.4 mM CaCl2, 5.4 mM KCl, 0.8 mM MgSO4, 110 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na2HPO4, 44 mM NaHCO3, 0.45% glucose, 0.1 M HEPES, 0.1% Casamino Acids] was used instead of DMEM. S. cerevisiae strains were grown at 30°C, unless specified otherwise. Yeast-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium was used for nonselective growth. Synthetic defined medium-His (SD-His) supplemented with 2% glucose or 2% galactose was used for selective growth. The following stressors were used for growth experiments: 1 M sorbitol, 7 mM caffeine, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.12 µg/ml tunicamycin, and a temperature of 37°C.

Construction of P. aeruginosa strains.

To construct P. aeruginosa strains expressing the putative effectors fused to BlaM, the putative effector genes were PCR amplified without the stop codon (primer pairs are listed in Table S4B), and the products were digested with the XbaI and EcoRI restriction enzymes. The cut products were ligated into pMS50 and fused to the blaM gene. Ligation products were electroporated into DH5α and grown on LB containing 100 µg/ml gentamicin for selection. The sequences of the plasmids from positive transformants were validated, and the plasmids were electroporated into the PAO1f Δ3tox and PAO1f Δ3tox ΔpscJ strains. BlaM expression was verified by Western blotting using anti-BlaM. pMS50 was constructed by inserting the blaM gene from pCX341 into pJN105 between the XbaI and SacI restriction sites. For construction of deletion mutants of pemA and pemB, overlap extension PCR using the primers specified in Table S4B was used in order to generate a fragment containing the upstream and downstream regions of each gene. By Gateway cloning, each fragment was cloned into the allelic-exchange vector DB3.1 pEX18GmGW with BP-Clonase (Invitrogen). Each deletion was introduced into PA14 by using biparental mating. Deletions were generated by a standard method for two-step allelic exchange and were confirmed by PCR and Southern blotting. To construct P. aeruginosa strains expressing the putative effectors fused to FLAG (for overexpression HeLa toxicity assays), the putative effector genes were PCR amplified (primer pairs are listed in Table S4B) and the products were digested with the XbaI and EcoRI restriction enzymes. The exoU gene was PCR amplified, and the product was digested with the NheI and SacI restriction enzymes. The cut product was ligated into pJN105 and fused to a FLAG tag on the N terminus. Ligation products were electroporated into DH5α and grown on LB containing 100 µg/ml gentamicin for selection. The sequences of the plasmids from positive transformants were validated, and the plasmids were electroporated into the relevant parental strain. FLAG expression was verified by Western blotting using anti-FLAG.

Construction of S. cerevisiae strains.

To construct S. cerevisiae strains expressing the pemA, pemB, and lpg2975 genes from the pGREG523-Km expression vector, the genes were PCR amplified, digested, and ligated into pUC18. Ligation products were electroporated into DH5α cells and grown on LB containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin for selection. The sequences of the plasmids from the positive transformants were validated. The genes were then cut from pUC18 and transferred to pGREG523-Km between EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites by using a standard restriction-ligation protocol. The vectors were then transferred to BY4741 by a standard yeast transformation protocol. Protein expression was verified with anti-myc.

Translocation assay.

A translocation assay was conducted as described in reference 26 with the following exceptions. HeLa cells were seeded at 106 cells/well in a 96-well plate. cDMEM was used instead of Hanks’ balanced salt solution. Cells were viewed and photographed on a Zeiss confocal microscope in real time.

Cytotoxicity assay.

HeLa cells were seeded at 106 cells/well in a 96-well plate. HeLa cells were infected at an MOI of 100 for 4 h and washed. Following infection, the wells were washed of bacteria with cDMEM and cytotoxicity was quantified by Promega’s CytoTox-ONE homogeneous membrane integrity assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In the S. cerevisiae spotting assay, S. cerevisiae BY4741 strains ectopically expressing pemA (pSS1586) and pemB (pYB1704) were grown overnight on selective medium supplemented with 2% glucose. BY4741 harboring the empty vector pGREG523-Km was used as a control. BY4741 expressing the Legionella effector protein lpg2975 (27) was used as a positive control. The next day, cultures were diluted 1:10 seven times. Five microliters from each dilution was pipetted on SD-His plates and SC-His 2% galactose plates. Plates were incubated at 30°C or 37°C for 48 h.

Western blot analysis.

Protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were then probed with antibodies against FLAG or MYC. Proteins of interest were detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody (for FLAG) or HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (for MYC) and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence in a Western blotting substrate. Machine learning classification scheme. Download Figure S1, DOCX file, 0.3 MB Translocation results of predicted effectors. Download Figure S2, DOCX file, 0.6 MB Alignments of PemA and PemB homologs from the Pseudomonas genus. Download Figure S3, PDF file, 0.8 MB Effector ExsA binding site in P. aeruginosa PA14. Download Figure S4, DOCX file, 0.1 MB Verification of expression of the effectors. Download Figure S5, DOCX file, 1.1 MB Overexpressed pemA and pemB are not cytotoxic to HeLa cells. Download Figure S6, DOCX file, 0.03 MB Positive machine-learning training-set and list of features used for the machine learning. Table S1, DOCX file, 0.04 MB Top 12 predicted effectors. Table S2, DOCX file, 0.01 MB Distribution of T3SS genes among different Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Table S3, DOCX file, 0.02 MB Strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study. Table S4, DOCX file, 0.03 MB
  22 in total

1.  HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment.

Authors:  Michael Remmert; Andreas Biegert; Andreas Hauser; Johannes Söding
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 2.  Computational prediction of type III and IV secreted effectors in gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Jason E McDermott; Abigail Corrigan; Elena Peterson; Christopher Oehmen; George Niemann; Eric D Cambronne; Danna Sharp; Joshua N Adkins; Ram Samudrala; Fred Heffron
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Expression of Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors in yeast under stress conditions reveals that HopX1 attenuates activation of the high osmolarity glycerol MAP kinase pathway.

Authors:  Dor Salomon; Eran Bosis; Daniel Dar; Iftach Nachman; Guido Sessa
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 4.  The type III secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: infection by injection.

Authors:  Alan R Hauser
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa injects NDK into host cells through a type III secretion system.

Authors:  Dennis Neeld; Yongxin Jin; Candace Bichsel; Jinghua Jia; Jianhui Guo; Fang Bai; Weihui Wu; Un-Hwan Ha; Naohiro Terada; Shouguang Jin
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.777

6.  Identification of Legionella pneumophila effectors regulated by the LetAS-RsmYZ-CsrA regulatory cascade, many of which modulate vesicular trafficking.

Authors:  Oded Nevo; Tal Zusman; Michal Rasis; Ziv Lifshitz; Gil Segal
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Global regulatory pathways and cross-talk control pseudomonas aeruginosa environmental lifestyle and virulence phenotype.

Authors:  Kimberly A Coggan; Matthew C Wolfgang
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.081

8.  Computational prediction of type III secreted proteins from gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Jiayuan Zhao; Robyn L Morgan; Wenbo Ma; Tao Jiang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Pseudomonas Genome Database: improved comparative analysis and population genomics capability for Pseudomonas genomes.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Winsor; David K W Lam; Leanne Fleming; Raymond Lo; Matthew D Whiteside; Nancy Y Yu; Robert E W Hancock; Fiona S L Brinkman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion system has an exotoxin S/T/Y independent pathogenic role during acute lung infection.

Authors:  Marlies Galle; Shouguang Jin; Pieter Bogaert; Mira Haegman; Peter Vandenabeele; Rudi Beyaert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial type III secretion system as a protein delivery tool for a broad range of biomedical applications.

Authors:  Fang Bai; Zhenpeng Li; Akihiro Umezawa; Naohiro Terada; Shouguang Jin
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 14.227

2.  Bacterial Nucleotidyl Cyclase Inhibits the Host Innate Immune Response by Suppressing TAK1 Activation.

Authors:  Chenxi He; Yilong Zhou; Feng Liu; Haipeng Liu; Hao Tan; Shouguang Jin; Weihui Wu; Baoxue Ge
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 3.  Fitting Pieces into the Puzzle of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III Secretion System Gene Expression.

Authors:  Emily A Williams McMackin; Louise Djapgne; Jodi M Corley; Timothy L Yahr
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa adaptation and evolution in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Elio Rossi; Ruggero La Rosa; Jennifer A Bartell; Rasmus L Marvig; Janus A J Haagensen; Lea M Sommer; Søren Molin; Helle Krogh Johansen
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Development of T3SS Mutants (hrpB- and hrcV-) of Ralstonia solanacearum, Evaluation of Virulence Attenuation in Brinjal and Tomato-A Pre-requisite to Validate T3Es of R. solanacearum.

Authors:  Trupti Asolkar; Raman Ramesh
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.461

6.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExsA Regulates a Metalloprotease, ImpA, That Inhibits Phagocytosis of Macrophages.

Authors:  Zhenyang Tian; Sen Cheng; Bin Xia; Yongxin Jin; Fang Bai; Zhihui Cheng; Shouguang Jin; Xiaoyun Liu; Weihui Wu
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Modulation of phagosome phosphoinositide dynamics by a Legionella phosphoinositide 3-kinase.

Authors:  Gen Li; Hongtao Liu; Zhao-Qing Luo; Jiazhang Qiu
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 8.  Forest and Trees: Exploring Bacterial Virulence with Genome-wide Association Studies and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Jonathan P Allen; Evan Snitkin; Nathan B Pincus; Alan R Hauser
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 18.230

9.  Actin activates Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoY nucleotidyl cyclase toxin and ExoY-like effector domains from MARTX toxins.

Authors:  Alexander Belyy; Dorothée Raoux-Barbot; Cosmin Saveanu; Abdelkader Namane; Vasily Ogryzko; Lina Worpenberg; Violaine David; Veronique Henriot; Souad Fellous; Christien Merrifield; Elodie Assayag; Daniel Ladant; Louis Renault; Undine Mechold
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Genome-wide Screen of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Identifies New Virulence Factors.

Authors:  Rafat Zrieq; Thibault G Sana; Sandra Vergin; Steve Garvis; Irina Volfson; Sophie Bleves; Romé Voulhoux; Johannes H Hegemann
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.