B Oliveri1, S R Mastaglia1, G M Brito1, M Seijo1, G A Keller2, J Somoza1, R A Diez2, G Di Girolamo2. 1. Laboratorio de Enfermedades Metabólicas Óseas, INIGEM-CONICET-UBA, Hospital de Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2. Segunda Cátedra de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: The superiority of cholecalciferol (D3) over ergocalciferol (D2) in sustaining serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) levels is controversial. To compare D2 with D3 we performed a single-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial spanning 11 weeks. SUBJECTS/ METHODS:Healthy volunteers (n=33, aged 33.4±6 years) were divided into three groups (n=11, each): D2, D3 and placebo. Treatment started with a loading dose (100,000 IU) followed by 4800 IU/day (d) between d7 and d20 and follow-up until d77. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at days 3, 7, 14, 21, 35, 49, 63 and 77. RESULTS:Baseline 25OHD values in the D2 group were lower than those in the D3 and placebo groups (P<0.01). Placebo25OHD levels never changed. As after the loading dose both D2 and D3 groups had reached similar 25OHD levels, we tested equivalence of the area under the concentration × time curve (AUC) between d7 and d77. The AUC was 28.6% higher for D3 compared with D2, and both were higher with respect to placebo. At d77, D2 25OHD levels were higher than those at baseline, but similar to placebo; both were lower than D3 (P<0.04). According to raw data, the elimination half-life of 25OHD was 84 and 111 days under D2 and D3 supplementation, respectively; after subtracting the placebo values, the corresponding figures were 33 and 82 days. CONCLUSIONS: D2 and D3 were equally effective in elevating 25OHD levels after a loading dose. In the long term, D3 seems more appropriate for sustaining 25OHD, which could be relevant for classic and non-classic effects of vitamin D.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: The superiority of cholecalciferol (D3) over ergocalciferol (D2) in sustaining serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) levels is controversial. To compare D2 with D3 we performed a single-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial spanning 11 weeks. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: Healthy volunteers (n=33, aged 33.4±6 years) were divided into three groups (n=11, each): D2, D3 and placebo. Treatment started with a loading dose (100,000 IU) followed by 4800 IU/day (d) between d7 and d20 and follow-up until d77. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at days 3, 7, 14, 21, 35, 49, 63 and 77. RESULTS: Baseline 25OHD values in the D2 group were lower than those in the D3 and placebo groups (P<0.01). Placebo 25OHD levels never changed. As after the loading dose both D2 and D3 groups had reached similar 25OHD levels, we tested equivalence of the area under the concentration × time curve (AUC) between d7 and d77. The AUC was 28.6% higher for D3 compared with D2, and both were higher with respect to placebo. At d77, D2 25OHD levels were higher than those at baseline, but similar to placebo; both were lower than D3 (P<0.04). According to raw data, the elimination half-life of 25OHD was 84 and 111 days under D2 and D3 supplementation, respectively; after subtracting the placebo values, the corresponding figures were 33 and 82 days. CONCLUSIONS:D2 and D3 were equally effective in elevating 25OHD levels after a loading dose. In the long term, D3 seems more appropriate for sustaining 25OHD, which could be relevant for classic and non-classic effects of vitamin D.
Authors: N Binkley; D Gemar; J Engelke; R Gangnon; R Ramamurthy; D Krueger; M K Drezner Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: H A Bischoff-Ferrari; A Shao; B Dawson-Hughes; J Hathcock; E Giovannucci; W C Willett Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Michael F Holick; Rachael M Biancuzzo; Tai C Chen; Ellen K Klein; Azzie Young; Douglass Bibuld; Richard Reitz; Wael Salameh; Allen Ameri; Andrew D Tannenbaum Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-12-18 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Rene F Chun; Ivan Hernandez; Renata Pereira; Leon Swinkles; Tonnie Huijs; Rui Zhou; Nancy Q Liu; Albert Shieh; Miriam Guemes; Sanjay M Mallya; John S Adams; Martin Hewison Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: L John Hoffer; Line Robitaille; Nelda Swinton; Jason Agulnik; Victor Cohen; David Small; Carmela Pepe; Shaun Eintracht Journal: Nutr J Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 3.271