Literature DB >> 23922354

Optimal vitamin D status: a critical analysis on the basis of evidence-based medicine.

Roger Bouillon1, Natasja M Van Schoor, Evelien Gielen, Steven Boonen, Chantal Mathieu, Dirk Vanderschueren, Paul Lips.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Public health authorities around the world recommend widely variable supplementation strategies for adults, whereas several professional organizations, including The Endocrine Society, recommend higher supplementation.
METHODS: We analyzed published randomized controlled clinical trials to define the optimal intake or vitamin D status for bone and extraskeletal health.
CONCLUSIONS: The extraskeletal effects of vitamin D are plausible as based on preclinical data and observational studies. However, apart from the beneficial effects of 800 IU/d of vitamin D3 for reduction of falls in the elderly, causality remains yet unproven in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The greatest risk for cancer, infections, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases is associated with 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels below 20 ng/mL. There is ample evidence from RCTs that calcium and bone homeostasis, estimated from serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and PTH, calcium absorption, or bone mass, can be normalized by 25OHD levels above 20 ng/mL. Moreover, vitamin D supplementation (800 IU/d) in combination with calcium can reduce fracture incidence by about 20%. Such a dose will bring serum levels of 25OHD above 20 ng/mL in nearly all postmenopausal women. Based on calculations of the metabolic clearance of 25OHD, a daily intake of 500-700 IU of vitamin D3 is sufficient to maintain serum 25OHD levels of 20 ng/mL. Therefore, the recommendations for a daily intake of 1500-2000 IU/d or serum 25OHD levels of 30 ng or higher for all adults or elderly subjects, as suggested by The Endocrine Society Task Force, are premature. Fortunately, ongoing RCTs will help to guide us to solve this important public health question.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23922354     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-1195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  96 in total

Review 1.  Measuring vitamin D.

Authors:  Paul Glendenning
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2014-11-24

Review 2.  New developments in our understanding of vitamin metabolism, action and treatment.

Authors:  Sylvia Christakos; Shanshan Li; Jessica De La Cruz; Daniel D Bikle
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 3.  Vitamin D assays and the definition of hypovitaminosis D: results from the First International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D.

Authors:  Christopher T Sempos; Annemieke C Heijboer; Daniel D Bikle; Jens Bollerslev; Roger Bouillon; Patsy M Brannon; Hector F DeLuca; Glenville Jones; Craig F Munns; John P Bilezikian; Andrea Giustina; Neil Binkley
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Changing patterns of prescription in vitamin D supplementation in adults: analysis of a regional dataset.

Authors:  L Cianferotti; S Parri; G Gronchi; C Rizzuti; C Fossi; D M Black; M L Brandi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Vitamin D Status Affects Serum Metabolomic Profiles in Pregnant Adolescents.

Authors:  Julia L Finkelstein; Eva K Pressman; Elizabeth M Cooper; Tera R Kent; Haim Y Bar; Kimberly O O'Brien
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 3.060

6.  Optimal vitamin D supplementation strategies.

Authors:  Roger Bouillon
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  Vitamin D: Musculoskeletal health.

Authors:  Harjit Pal Bhattoa; Jerzy Konstantynowicz; Natalia Laszcz; Marek Wojcik; Pawel Pludowski
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 6.514

8.  The double-edged sword of vitamin D in Ireland: the need for public health awareness about too much as well as too little.

Authors:  M T Kilbane; M O'Keane; M Morrin; M Flynn; M J McKenna
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 9.  Skeletal and nonskeletal effects of vitamin D: is vitamin D a tonic for bone and other tissues?

Authors:  I R Reid; M J Bolland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Vitamin D supplements with or without calcium to prevent fractures.

Authors:  Paul Lips; Evelien Gielen; Natasja M van Schoor
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.