Literature DB >> 25780236

Barriers and benefits: implications of artificial night-lighting for the distribution of common bats in Britain and Ireland.

Fiona Mathews1, Niamh Roche2, Tina Aughney2, Nicholas Jones3, Julie Day4, James Baker4, Steve Langton5.   

Abstract

Artificial lighting is a particular problem for animals active at night. Approximately 69% of mammal species are nocturnal, and one-third of these are bats. Due to their extensive movements-both on a nightly basis to exploit ephemeral food supplies, and during migration between roosts-bats have an unusually high probability of encountering artificial light in the landscape. This paper reviews the impacts of lighting on bats and their prey, exploring the direct and indirect consequences of lighting intensity and spectral composition. In addition, new data from large-scale surveys involving more than 265 000 bat calls at more than 600 locations in two countries are presented, showing that prevalent street-lighting types are not generally linked with increased activity of common and widespread bat species. Such bats, which are important to ecosystem function, are generally considered 'light-attracted' and likely to benefit from the insect congregations that form at lights. Leisler's bat (Nyctalus leisleri) may be an exception, being more frequent in lit than dark transects. For common pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus), lighting is negatively associated with their distribution on a landscape scale, but there may be local increases in habitats with good tree cover. Research is now needed on the impacts of sky glow and glare for bat navigation, and to explore the implications of lighting for habitat matrix permeability.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chiroptera; bats; fragmentation; light; migration; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25780236      PMCID: PMC4375364          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.671


  34 in total

1.  Echolocating bats can use acoustic landmarks for spatial orientation.

Authors:  Marianne Egebjerg Jensen; Cynthia F Moss; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Ecosystem services provided by bats.

Authors:  Thomas H Kunz; Elizabeth Braun de Torrez; Dana Bauer; Tatyana Lobova; Theodore H Fleming
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Conservation. Economic importance of bats in agriculture.

Authors:  Justin G Boyles; Paul M Cryan; Gary F McCracken; Thomas H Kunz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology.

Authors:  M W Schwartz; C A Brigham; J D Hoeksema; K G Lyons; M H Mills; P J van Mantgem
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Jonathan Bennie; Thomas W Davies; John Hopkins
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2013-04-08

6.  A nocturnal mammal, the greater mouse-eared bat, calibrates a magnetic compass by the sun.

Authors:  Richard A Holland; Ivailo Borissov; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Navigation: bat orientation using Earth's magnetic field.

Authors:  Richard A Holland; Kasper Thorup; Maarten J Vonhof; William W Cochran; Martin Wikelski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Vision impairs the abilities of bats to avoid colliding with stationary obstacles.

Authors:  Dara N Orbach; Brock Fenton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The photoreceptor populations in the retina of the greater horseshoe bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum.

Authors:  Tae-Jin Kim; Young-Ki Jeon; Jea-Young Lee; Eun-Shil Lee; Chang-Jin Jeon
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.034

10.  Influence of landscape structure and human modifications on insect biomass and bat foraging activity in an urban landscape.

Authors:  Caragh G Threlfall; Bradley Law; Peter B Banks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  Response of bats to light with different spectra: light-shy and agile bat presence is affected by white and green, but not red light.

Authors:  Kamiel Spoelstra; Roy H A van Grunsven; Jip J C Ramakers; Kim B Ferguson; Thomas Raap; Maurice Donners; Elmar M Veenendaal; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Enric Frago; Rachel Kehoe; Christophe Patterson; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 3.  Exposure to Artificial Light at Night and the Consequences for Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems.

Authors:  Jack Falcón; Alicia Torriglia; Dina Attia; Françoise Viénot; Claude Gronfier; Francine Behar-Cohen; Christophe Martinsons; David Hicks
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Marcel E Visser; Franz Hölker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Differential responses to woodland character and landscape context by cryptic bats in urban environments.

Authors:  Paul R Lintott; Nils Bunnefeld; Jeroen Minderman; Elisa Fuentes-Montemayor; Rebekah J Mayhew; Lena Olley; Kirsty J Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Roads and bats: a meta-analysis and review of the evidence on vehicle collisions and barrier effects.

Authors:  Amy Grace Fensome; Fiona Mathews
Journal:  Mamm Rev       Date:  2016-05-29       Impact factor: 4.927

7.  Age of enlightenment: long-term effects of outdoor aesthetic lights on bats in churches.

Authors:  Jens Rydell; Johan Eklöf; Sonia Sánchez-Navarro
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Urban bat communities are affected by wetland size, quality, and pollution levels.

Authors:  Tanja Maria Straka; Pia Eloise Lentini; Linda Faye Lumsden; Brendan Anthony Wintle; Rodney van der Ree
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Migratory bats respond to artificial green light with positive phototaxis.

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; Manuel Roeleke; Lara Marggraf; Gunārs Pētersons; Silke L Voigt-Heucke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Switch from Low-Pressure Sodium to Light Emitting Diodes Does Not Affect Bat Activity at Street Lights.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Rowse; Stephen Harris; Gareth Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.