Literature DB >> 20351296

A nocturnal mammal, the greater mouse-eared bat, calibrates a magnetic compass by the sun.

Richard A Holland1, Ivailo Borissov, Björn M Siemers.   

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that bats can detect the geomagnetic field, but the way in which this is used by them for navigation to a home roost remains unresolved. The geomagnetic field may be used by animals both to indicate direction and to locate position. In birds, directional information appears to be derived from an interaction of the magnetic field with either the sun or the stars, with some evidence suggesting that sunset/sunrise provides the primary directional reference by which a magnetic compass is calibrated daily. We demonstrate that homing greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis) calibrate a magnetic compass with sunset cues by testing their homing response after exposure to an altered magnetic field at and after sunset. Magnetic manipulation at sunset resulted in a counterclockwise shift in orientation compared with controls, consistent with sunset calibration of the magnetic field, whereas magnetic manipulation after sunset resulted in no change in orientation. Unlike in birds, however, the pattern of polarization was not necessary for the calibration. For animals that occupy ecological niches where the sunset is rarely observed, this is a surprising finding. Yet it may indicate the primacy of the sun as an absolute geographical reference not only for birds but also within other vertebrate taxa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20351296      PMCID: PMC2872435          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912477107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

1.  Polarized light cues underlie compass calibration in migratory songbirds.

Authors:  Rachel Muheim; John B Phillips; Susanne Akesson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Magnetoreception.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 3.  Magnetic maps in animals: a theory comes of age?

Authors:  Michael J Freake; Rachel Muheim; John B Phillips
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.875

4.  Do release-site biases reflect response to the Earth's magnetic field during position determination by homing pigeons?

Authors:  Cordula V Mora; Michael M Walker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Optics of the eyes of echolocating bats.

Authors:  R A Suthers; N E Wallis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Optomotor responses by echolocating bats.

Authors:  R A Suthers
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Animal behaviour: geomagnetic map used in sea-turtle navigation.

Authors:  Kenneth J Lohmann; Catherine M F Lohmann; Llewellyn M Ehrhart; Dean A Bagley; Timothy Swing
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Passive sound-localization ability of the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus).

Authors:  G Koay; D Kearns; H E Heffner; R S Heffner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Behavioural investigation of polarisation sensitivity in the Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) and the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  Verity J Greenwood; Emma L Smith; Stuart C Church; Julian C Partridge
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Bats use magnetite to detect the earth's magnetic field.

Authors:  Richard A Holland; Joseph L Kirschvink; Thomas G Doak; Martin Wikelski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  Polarized skylight does not calibrate the compass system of a migratory bat.

Authors:  Oliver Lindecke; Christian C Voigt; Gunārs Pētersons; Richard A Holland
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Magnetic field perception in the rainbow trout Oncorynchus mykiss: magnetite mediated, light dependent or both?

Authors:  Jens Hellinger; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  A magnetic compass guides the direction of foraging in a bat.

Authors:  Lanxiang Tian; Bingfang Zhang; Jinshuo Zhang; Tongwei Zhang; Yao Cai; Huafeng Qin; Walter Metzner; Yongxin Pan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  A strong magnetic pulse affects the precision of departure direction of naturally migrating adult but not juvenile birds.

Authors:  Richard A Holland; Barbara Helm
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Large-scale navigational map in a mammal.

Authors:  Asaf Tsoar; Ran Nathan; Yoav Bartan; Alexei Vyssotski; Giacomo Dell'Omo; Nachum Ulanovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Orientation behaviour of leatherback sea turtles within the North Atlantic subtropical gyre.

Authors:  Kara L Dodge; Benjamin Galuardi; Molly E Lutcavage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Magnetic orientation of the Common Toad: establishing an arena approach for adult anurans.

Authors:  Lukas Landler; Günter Gollmann
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Spontaneous expression of magnetic compass orientation in an epigeic rodent: the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus.

Authors:  Ludmila Oliveriusová; Pavel Němec; Zuzana Pavelková; František Sedláček
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-06-10

Review 9.  PRINCIPLES AND PATTERNS OF BAT MOVEMENTS: FROM AERODYNAMICS TO ECOLOGY.

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; Winifred F Frick; Marc W Holderied; Richard Holland; Gerald Kerth; Marco A R Mello; Raina K Plowright; Sharon Swartz; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.875

10.  Barriers and benefits: implications of artificial night-lighting for the distribution of common bats in Britain and Ireland.

Authors:  Fiona Mathews; Niamh Roche; Tina Aughney; Nicholas Jones; Julie Day; James Baker; Steve Langton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.