OBJECTIVES: The traditional view of differential left ventricular adaptation to training type has been questioned. Right ventricular (RV) data in athletes are emerging but whether training type mediates this is not clear. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the RV phenotype in endurance- vs. resistance-trained male athletes. Secondary aims included comparison of RV function in all groups using myocardial speckle tracking, and the impact of allometric scaling on RV data interpretation. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional design assessed RV structure and function in 19 endurance-trained (ET), 21 resistance-trained (RT) and 21 sedentary control subjects (CT). Standard 2D tissue Doppler imaging and speckle tracking echocardiography assessed RV structure and function. Indexing of RV structural parameters to body surface area (BSA) was undertaken using allometric scaling. RESULTS: A higher absolute RV diastolic area was observed in ET (mean ± SD: 27 ± 4 cm(2)) compared to CT (22 ± 4 cm(2); P < 0.05) that was maintained after scaling. Whilst absolute RV longitudinal dimension was greater in ET (88 ± 9 mm) than CT (81 ± 10 mm; P < 0.05), this difference was removed after scaling. Wall thickness was not different between ET and RT and there were no between group differences in global or regional RV function. CONCLUSION: We present some evidence of RV adaptation to chronic ET in male athletes but limited structural characteristics of an athletic heart were observed in RT. Global and regional RV functions were comparable between groups. Allometric scaling altered data interpretation in some variables.
OBJECTIVES: The traditional view of differential left ventricular adaptation to training type has been questioned. Right ventricular (RV) data in athletes are emerging but whether training type mediates this is not clear. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the RV phenotype in endurance- vs. resistance-trained male athletes. Secondary aims included comparison of RV function in all groups using myocardial speckle tracking, and the impact of allometric scaling on RV data interpretation. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional design assessed RV structure and function in 19 endurance-trained (ET), 21 resistance-trained (RT) and 21 sedentary control subjects (CT). Standard 2D tissue Doppler imaging and speckle tracking echocardiography assessed RV structure and function. Indexing of RV structural parameters to body surface area (BSA) was undertaken using allometric scaling. RESULTS: A higher absolute RV diastolic area was observed in ET (mean ± SD: 27 ± 4 cm(2)) compared to CT (22 ± 4 cm(2); P < 0.05) that was maintained after scaling. Whilst absolute RV longitudinal dimension was greater in ET (88 ± 9 mm) than CT (81 ± 10 mm; P < 0.05), this difference was removed after scaling. Wall thickness was not different between ET and RT and there were no between group differences in global or regional RV function. CONCLUSION: We present some evidence of RV adaptation to chronic ET in male athletes but limited structural characteristics of an athletic heart were observed in RT. Global and regional RV functions were comparable between groups. Allometric scaling altered data interpretation in some variables.
Authors: Lawrence G Rudski; Wyman W Lai; Jonathan Afilalo; Lanqi Hua; Mark D Handschumacher; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Scott D Solomon; Eric K Louie; Nelson B Schiller Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Barry J Maron; Paul D Thompson; Michael J Ackerman; Gary Balady; Stuart Berger; David Cohen; Robert Dimeff; Pamela S Douglas; David W Glover; Adolph M Hutter; Michael D Krauss; Martin S Maron; Matthew J Mitten; William O Roberts; James C Puffer Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Frederick E Dewey; David Rosenthal; Daniel J Murphy; Victor F Froelicher; Euan A Ashley Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Frank I Marcus; William J McKenna; Duane Sherrill; Cristina Basso; Barbara Bauce; David A Bluemke; Hugh Calkins; Domenico Corrado; Moniek G P J Cox; James P Daubert; Guy Fontaine; Kathleen Gear; Richard Hauer; Andrea Nava; Michael H Picard; Nikos Protonotarios; Jeffrey E Saffitz; Danita M Yoerger Sanborn; Jonathan S Steinberg; Harikrishna Tandri; Gaetano Thiene; Jeffrey A Towbin; Adalena Tsatsopoulou; Thomas Wichter; Wojciech Zareba Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Victor Utomi; David Oxborough; Greg P Whyte; John Somauroo; Sanjay Sharma; Rob Shave; Greg Atkinson; Keith George Journal: Heart Date: 2013-03-09 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Arco J Teske; Moniek G Cox; Bart W De Boeck; Pieter A Doevendans; Richard N Hauer; Maarten J Cramer Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Maria Sanz-de la Garza; Geneviève Giraldeau; Josefa Marin; Gonzalo Grazioli; Montserrat Esteve; Luigi Gabrielli; Carlos Brambila; Laura Sanchis; Bart Bijnens; Marta Sitges Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Valeria Conti; Filippo Migliorini; Marco Pilone; María I Barriopedro; Juan José Ramos-Álvarez; Francisco Javer Calderon Montero; Nicola Maffulli Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Viswanath B Unnithan; Alexander Beaumont; Thomas W Rowland; Nicholas Sculthorpe; Keith George; Rachel Lord; David Oxborough Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 3.078