AIMS: To determine the intraobserver reproducibility of peak and temporal values for myocardial strain (ɛ) and strain rate (SR) using a speckle tracking technique in the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), and left atrium (LA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Myocardial speckle tracking echocardiograms of the LV, RV, and LA were obtained on 20 healthy adults to provide indices of longitudinal, radial, circumferential ɛ, and SR as well as LV rotation and twist. Each participant had two separate acquisitions approximately 30 minutes apart. No systematic bias was present in ɛ data. LV ɛ across all planes provided "good" to "very good" intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values (0.714-0.807), however radial ɛ was inferior in terms of coefficients of variation (CoV) (19%). SR data were more variable than ɛ with LV radial SR performing least favorably. RV and LA ɛ demonstrated excellent reproducibility (ICCs of 0.834, 0.959, and CoVs of 7% and 6%, respectively). RV and LA SR were again more variable but generally acceptable ICC > 0.6 and CoV < 15%. Peak basal and apical rotation demonstrated quite high variability while derived torsion had low variability and excellent agreement (ICC = 0.940, CoV = 10%). Time-to-peak values demonstrated acceptable agreement with the exception of systolic SR from all chambers. CONCLUSION: Good reproducibility was obtained for peak ɛ indices although radial ɛ performs less favorably. Intraobserver variation of peak ɛ appears superior to values obtained for peak SR. Time-to-peak values demonstrate very good intraobserver reproducibility across all planes of contraction with exception of (time-to-peak) systolic strain rate (SRS).
AIMS: To determine the intraobserver reproducibility of peak and temporal values for myocardial strain (ɛ) and strain rate (SR) using a speckle tracking technique in the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), and left atrium (LA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Myocardial speckle tracking echocardiograms of the LV, RV, and LA were obtained on 20 healthy adults to provide indices of longitudinal, radial, circumferential ɛ, and SR as well as LV rotation and twist. Each participant had two separate acquisitions approximately 30 minutes apart. No systematic bias was present in ɛ data. LV ɛ across all planes provided "good" to "very good" intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values (0.714-0.807), however radial ɛ was inferior in terms of coefficients of variation (CoV) (19%). SR data were more variable than ɛ with LV radial SR performing least favorably. RV and LA ɛ demonstrated excellent reproducibility (ICCs of 0.834, 0.959, and CoVs of 7% and 6%, respectively). RV and LA SR were again more variable but generally acceptable ICC > 0.6 and CoV < 15%. Peak basal and apical rotation demonstrated quite high variability while derived torsion had low variability and excellent agreement (ICC = 0.940, CoV = 10%). Time-to-peak values demonstrated acceptable agreement with the exception of systolic SR from all chambers. CONCLUSION: Good reproducibility was obtained for peak ɛ indices although radial ɛ performs less favorably. Intraobserver variation of peak ɛ appears superior to values obtained for peak SR. Time-to-peak values demonstrate very good intraobserver reproducibility across all planes of contraction with exception of (time-to-peak) systolic strain rate (SRS).
Authors: Victor Utomi; David Oxborough; Euan Ashley; Rachel Lord; Sarah Fletcher; Mike Stembridge; Rob Shave; Martin D Hoffman; Greg Whyte; John Somauroo; Sanjay Sharma; Keith George Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Gregory R Hartlage; Jonathan H Kim; Patrick T Strickland; Alan C Cheng; Nima Ghasemzadeh; Maria A Pernetz; Stephen D Clements; B Robinson Williams Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Susan Cheng; Martin G Larson; Elizabeth L McCabe; Ewa Osypiuk; Birgitta T Lehman; Plamen Stanchev; Jayashri Aragam; Emelia J Benjamin; Scott D Solomon; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Danielle L Shepherd; Cody E Nichols; Tara L Croston; Sarah L McLaughlin; Ashley B Petrone; Sara E Lewis; Dharendra Thapa; Dustin M Long; Gregory M Dick; John M Hollander Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Isaac R Whitman; Vickas V Patel; Elsayed Z Soliman; David A Bluemke; Amy Praestgaard; Aditya Jain; David Herrington; Joao A C Lima; Steven M Kawut Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-09-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Remy Merkx; Jan M Leerink; Elisabeth Lieke A M Feijen; Leontien C M Kremer; Esmée C de Baat; Louise Bellersen; Elvira C van Dalen; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Chris L de Korte; Jacqueline Loonen; Marloes Louwerens; Angela H E M Maas; Yigal M Pinto; Cécile M Ronckers; Arco J Teske; Wim J E Tissing; Andrica C H de Vries; Annelies M C Mavinkurve-Groothuis; Helena J H van der Pal; Gert Weijers; Wouter E M Kok; Livia Kapusta Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Sirisha Donekal; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Seth Berkowitz; Colin O Wu; Eui Young Choi; Veronica Fernandes; Raymond Yan; Ahmed A Harouni; David A Bluemke; Joao A C Lima Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 5.364