Literature DB >> 25777366

Predicting postoperative complications of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer in an international multicentre cohort.

Jared M Gopman1, Rosa S Djajadiningrat2, Adam S Baumgarten1, Patrick N Espiritu1, Simon Horenblas2, Yao Zhu3, Chris Protzel4, Julio M Pow-Sang2, Timothy Kim1, Wade J Sexton1, Michael A Poch1, Philippe E Spiess1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential complications associated with inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) across international tertiary care referral centres, and to determine the prognostic factors that best predict the development of these complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted across four international cancer centres. The study population of 327 patients underwent diagnostic/therapeutic ILND. The endpoint was the overall incidence of complications and their respective severity (major/minor). The Clavien-Dindo classification system was used to standardize the reporting of complications.
RESULTS: A total of 181 patients (55.4%) had a postoperative complication, with minor complications in 119 cases (65.7%) and major in 62 (34.3%). The total number of lymph nodes removed was an independent predictor of experiencing any complication, while the median number of lymph nodes removed was an independent predictor of major complications. The American Joint Committee on Cancer stage was an independent predictor of all wound infections, while the patient's age, ILND with Sartorius flap transposition, and surgery performed before the year 2008 were independent predictors of major wound infections.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest report of complication rates after ILND for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and it shows that the majority of complications associated with ILND are minor and resolve without prolonged morbidity. Variables pertaining to the extent of disease burden have been found to be prognostic of increased postoperative morbidity.
© 2014 The Authors BJU International © 2014 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; inguinal lymph node dissection; penile cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25777366     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  15 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary management of patients with penile cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Andrew Leone; Gregory J Diorio; Curtis Pettaway; Viraj Master; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Effect of inguinal lymph node dissection in lymph node negative patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Stefano Tappero; Mattia Piccinelli; Francesco Barletta; Andrea Panunzio; Cristina Cano Garcia; Reha-Baris Incesu; Zhe Tian; Stefano Parodi; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Ottavio De Cobelli; Alberto Briganti; Alessandro Antonelli; Felix K H Chun; Markus Graefen; Fred Saad; Shahrokh F Shariat; Nazareno R Suardi; Marco Borghesi; Carlo Terrone; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Morbidity and risk factors for complications of inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer.

Authors:  Antoine Jeanne-Julien; Olivier Bouchot; Stéphane De Vergie; Julien Branchereau; Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe; Jérôme Rigaud
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  [Long-term results of sentinel node biopsy diagnostics in penile carcinoma : Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in cases with nonpalpable lymph nodes in the groin].

Authors:  C M Naumann; K Bothe; A-K Munk-Hartig; C van der Horst; H Massad; U Lützen; K-P Jünemann; M F Hamann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Value and efficiency of sentinel lymph node diagnostics in patients with penile carcinoma with palpable inguinal lymph nodes as a new multimodal, minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Ulf Lützen; Maaz Zuhayra; Marlies Marx; Yi Zhao; Christian Colberg; Stephanie Knüpfer; René Baumann; Katharina Charlotte Kähler; Klaus-Peter Jünemann; Carsten Maik Naumann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Progress on Management of Penile Cancer in 2020.

Authors:  Mohamed E Ahmed; Mahmoud I Khalil; Mohamed H Kamel; R Jeffrey Karnes; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-11-23

Review 7.  Robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what.

Authors:  Sammy E Elsamra; Michael A Poch
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

Review 8.  Technical considerations to minimize complications of inguinal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Manik K Gupta; Amar P Patel; Viraj A Master
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

Review 9.  Recent advances in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Maximilian J Johnston; Raj Nigam
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-04-26

10.  Practice Patterns Among Penile Cancer Surgeons Performing Dynamic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Radical Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Men with Penile Cancer: A eUROGEN Survey.

Authors:  Christian D Fankhauser; Benjamin E Ayres; Allaudin Issa; Maarten Albersen; Nick Watkin; Asif Muneer; Vijay Sangar; Arie Parnham
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.