Literature DB >> 25775544

The effects of reputational and social knowledge on cooperation.

Edoardo Gallo1, Chang Yan2.   

Abstract

The emergence and sustenance of cooperative behavior is fundamental for a society to thrive. Recent experimental studies have shown that cooperation increases in dynamic networks in which subjects can choose their partners. However, these studies did not vary reputational knowledge, or what subjects know about other's past actions, which has long been recognized as an important factor in supporting cooperation. They also did not give subjects access to global social knowledge, or information on who is connected to whom in the group. As a result, it remained unknown how reputational and social knowledge foster cooperative behavior in dynamic networks both independently and by complementing each other. In an experimental setting, we show that global reputational knowledge is crucial to sustaining a high level of cooperation and welfare. Cooperation is associated with the emergence of dense and clustered networks with highly cooperative hubs. Global social knowledge has no effect on the aggregate level of cooperation. A community analysis shows that the addition of global social knowledge to global reputational knowledge affects the distribution of cooperative activity: cooperators form a separate community that achieves a higher cooperation level than the community of defectors. Members of the community of cooperators achieve a higher payoff from interactions within the community than members of the less cooperative community.

Keywords:  cooperation; experiments; reputation; social knowledge; social networks

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25775544      PMCID: PMC4378402          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1415883112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak; Karl Sigmund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki; Yoh Iwasa
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki; Christoph Hauert; Erez Lieberman; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evolution of cooperation in a finite homogeneous graph.

Authors:  Peter D Taylor; Troy Day; Geoff Wild
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Coevolution of strategy and structure in complex networks with dynamical linking.

Authors:  Jorge M Pacheco; Arne Traulsen; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans.

Authors:  David G Rand; Samuel Arbesman; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Human cooperation.

Authors:  David G Rand; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation.

Authors:  Katrin Fehl; Daniel J van der Post; Dirk Semmann
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 10.  Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak; Corina E Tarnita; Tibor Antal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  29 in total

1.  The emergence and selection of reputation systems that drive cooperative behaviour.

Authors:  Alain Schlaepfer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Building the community: Endogenous network formation, homophily and prosocial sorting among therapeutic community residents.

Authors:  Keith Warren; Benjamin Campbell; Skyler Cranmer; George De Leon; Nathan Doogan; Mackenzie Weiler; Fiona Doherty
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Oxytocin and the Punitive Hub-Dynamic Spread of Cooperation in Human Social Networks.

Authors:  Shiyi Li; Shuangmei Ma; Danyang Wang; Hejing Zhang; Yunzhu Li; Jiaxin Wang; Jingyi Li; Boyu Zhang; Jörg Gross; Carsten K W De Dreu; Wen-Xu Wang; Yina Ma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Cooperation, clustering, and assortative mixing in dynamic networks.

Authors:  David Melamed; Ashley Harrell; Brent Simpson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Reputation and socio-ecology in humans.

Authors:  A Romano; F Giardini; S Columbus; E W de Kwaadsteniet; D Kisfalusi; Z Triki; C Snijders; K Hagel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Therapeutic community graduates cluster together in social networks: Evidence for spatial selection as a cooperative mechanism in therapeutic communities.

Authors:  Benjamin W Campbell; Skyler Cranmer; Carole Harvey; Keith Warren
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.591

7.  Group Size Effect on Cooperation in One-Shot Social Dilemmas II: Curvilinear Effect.

Authors:  Valerio Capraro; Hélène Barcelo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparing reactive and memory-one strategies of direct reciprocity.

Authors:  Seung Ki Baek; Hyeong-Chai Jeong; Christian Hilbe; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Cooperation Survives and Cheating Pays in a Dynamic Network Structure with Unreliable Reputation.

Authors:  Alberto Antonioni; Angel Sánchez; Marco Tomassini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Reputation Effects in Social Networks Do Not Promote Cooperation: An Experimental Test of the Raub & Weesie Model.

Authors:  Rense Corten; Stephanie Rosenkranz; Vincent Buskens; Karen S Cook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.