OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the 2006 Massachusetts (MA) health reform on disparities in the management of acute cholecystitis (AC). BACKGROUND: Immediate cholecystectomy has been shown to be the optimal treatment for AC, yet variation in care persists depending upon insurance status and patient race. How increased insurance coverage impacts these disparities in surgical care is not known. METHODS: A cohort study of patients admitted with AC in MA and 3 control states from 2001 through 2009 was performed using the Hospital Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases. We examined all nonelderly white, black, or Latino patients by insurance type and patient race, evaluating changes in the probability of undergoing immediate cholecystectomy and disparities in receiving immediate cholecystectomy before and after Massachusetts health reform. RESULTS: Data from 141,344 patients hospitalized for AC were analyzed. Before the 2006 reform, government-subsidized/self-pay (GS/SP) patients had a 6.6 to 9.9 percentage-point lower (P < 0.001) probability of immediate cholecystectomy in both MA control states. The MA insurance expansion was independently associated with a 2.5 percentage-point increased probability of immediate cholecystectomy for all GS/SP patients in MA (P = 0.049) and a 5.0 percentage-point increased probability (P = 0.011) for nonwhite, GS/SP patients compared to control states. Racial disparities in the probability of immediate cholecystectomy seen before health care reform were no longer statistically significant after reform in MA while persisting in control states. CONCLUSIONS: The MA health reform was associated with increased probability of undergoing immediate cholecystectomy for AC and reduced disparities in undergoing cholecystectomy by insurance status and patient race.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the 2006 Massachusetts (MA) health reform on disparities in the management of acute cholecystitis (AC). BACKGROUND: Immediate cholecystectomy has been shown to be the optimal treatment for AC, yet variation in care persists depending upon insurance status and patient race. How increased insurance coverage impacts these disparities in surgical care is not known. METHODS: A cohort study of patients admitted with AC in MA and 3 control states from 2001 through 2009 was performed using the Hospital Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases. We examined all nonelderly white, black, or Latino patients by insurance type and patient race, evaluating changes in the probability of undergoing immediate cholecystectomy and disparities in receiving immediate cholecystectomy before and after Massachusetts health reform. RESULTS: Data from 141,344 patients hospitalized for AC were analyzed. Before the 2006 reform, government-subsidized/self-pay (GS/SP) patients had a 6.6 to 9.9 percentage-point lower (P < 0.001) probability of immediate cholecystectomy in both MA control states. The MA insurance expansion was independently associated with a 2.5 percentage-point increased probability of immediate cholecystectomy for all GS/SPpatients in MA (P = 0.049) and a 5.0 percentage-point increased probability (P = 0.011) for nonwhite, GS/SPpatients compared to control states. Racial disparities in the probability of immediate cholecystectomy seen before health care reform were no longer statistically significant after reform in MA while persisting in control states. CONCLUSIONS: The MA health reform was associated with increased probability of undergoing immediate cholecystectomy for AC and reduced disparities in undergoing cholecystectomy by insurance status and patient race.
Authors: Peter B Smulowitz; Robert Lipton; J Frank Wharam; Leon Adelman; Scott G Weiner; Laura Burke; Christopher W Baugh; Jeremiah D Schuur; Shan W Liu; Meghan E McGrath; Bella Liu; Assaad Sayah; Mary C Burke; J Hector Pope; Bruce E Landon Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Amresh D Hanchate; Karen E Lasser; Alok Kapoor; Jennifer Rosen; Danny McCormick; Meredith M D'Amore; Nancy R Kressin Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: K A Schulman; J A Berlin; W Harless; J F Kerner; S Sistrunk; B J Gersh; R Dubé; C K Taleghani; J E Burke; S Williams; J M Eisenberg; J J Escarce Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-02-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrew P. Loehrer; David C. Chang; John W. Scott; Matthew M. Hutter; Virendra I. Patel; Jeffrey E. Lee; Benjamin D. Sommers Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Andrew P Loehrer; Zirui Song; Alex B Haynes; David C Chang; Matthew M Hutter; John T Mullen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew P Loehrer; Mary M Leech; Julie E Weiss; Chad Markey; Erik Wengle; Joshua Aarons; Stephen Zuckerman Journal: JAMA Health Forum Date: 2021-09-03
Authors: Andrew P Loehrer; David C Chang; Matthew M Hutter; Zirui Song; Keith D Lillemoe; Andrew L Warshaw; Cristina R Ferrone Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 6.113