Carrie J Lovitt1, Todd B Shelper, Vicky M Avery. 1. Discovery Biology, Eskitis Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Building N27, Brisbane Innovation Park, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia, carrie.lovitt@griffithuni.edu.au.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Utilization of miniaturized three-dimensional (3D) cell culture-based assays enables investigation into the anticancer activity of drug candidates and further elucidation of the anticancer profile of standard-of-care chemotherapeutic agents against tumor cells. Drug discovery assays established using 3D cell culture, which better recapitulate the tumor microenvironment, may more accurately reflect the antitumor activity of compounds. METHODS: Several standard-of-care anticancer drugs, epirubicin, paclitaxel and vinorelbine, were evaluated against a panel of breast cancer cell lines grown in a 3D cell culture microenvironment in the presence of extracellular matrix. A comparison of this antitumor activity in 3D conditions was made with that observed in traditional two-dimensional (2D) monolayer conditions. RESULTS: Examination of the above mentioned drugs against breast tumor cells cultured in 3D conditions demonstrated significantly altered potency and efficacy in comparison with cells propagated in a 2D monolayer system. The differences observed were cell line-dependent and drug-specific; the triple-negative cell line MDA-MB-231 and the endocrine receptor-positive cell line MCF-7 consistently displayed resistance to therapeutics with distinct modes of action (i.e., topoisomerase II and microtubules) in 3D cell culture in comparison with ErbB2 receptor-positive BT-474 cells. CONCLUSION: The data presented herein demonstrates the cellular viability and physical changes observed within the 3D spheroid following exposure to drug, which is not always reflected in 2D cell culture models.
PURPOSE: Utilization of miniaturized three-dimensional (3D) cell culture-based assays enables investigation into the anticancer activity of drug candidates and further elucidation of the anticancer profile of standard-of-care chemotherapeutic agents against tumor cells. Drug discovery assays established using 3D cell culture, which better recapitulate the tumor microenvironment, may more accurately reflect the antitumor activity of compounds. METHODS: Several standard-of-care anticancer drugs, epirubicin, paclitaxel and vinorelbine, were evaluated against a panel of breast cancer cell lines grown in a 3D cell culture microenvironment in the presence of extracellular matrix. A comparison of this antitumor activity in 3D conditions was made with that observed in traditional two-dimensional (2D) monolayer conditions. RESULTS: Examination of the above mentioned drugs against breast tumor cells cultured in 3D conditions demonstrated significantly altered potency and efficacy in comparison with cells propagated in a 2D monolayer system. The differences observed were cell line-dependent and drug-specific; the triple-negative cell line MDA-MB-231 and the endocrine receptor-positive cell line MCF-7 consistently displayed resistance to therapeutics with distinct modes of action (i.e., topoisomerase II and microtubules) in 3D cell culture in comparison with ErbB2 receptor-positive BT-474 cells. CONCLUSION: The data presented herein demonstrates the cellular viability and physical changes observed within the 3D spheroid following exposure to drug, which is not always reflected in 2D cell culture models.
Authors: Victor Sanjit Nirmalanandhan; Alicia Duren; Peter Hendricks; George Vielhauer; Gurusingham Sitta Sittampalam Journal: Assay Drug Dev Technol Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 1.738
Authors: Britta Weigelt; Alvin T Lo; Catherine C Park; Joe W Gray; Mina J Bissell Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2009-08-22 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Catherine Huang; Catherine C Park; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Robin Ward; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Yen-Chao Wang; Jiang Shou; Mina J Bissell; C Kent Osborne; Rachel Schiff Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Maria Vinci; Sharon Gowan; Frances Boxall; Lisa Patterson; Miriam Zimmermann; William Court; Cara Lomas; Marta Mendiola; David Hardisson; Suzanne A Eccles Journal: BMC Biol Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 7.431
Authors: Elizabeth A Brooks; Sualyneth Galarza; Maria F Gencoglu; R Chase Cornelison; Jennifer M Munson; Shelly R Peyton Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Karan Arora; Mackenzie Herroon; Malik H Al-Afyouni; Nicholas P Toupin; Thomas N Rohrabaugh; Lauren M Loftus; Izabela Podgorski; Claudia Turro; Jeremy J Kodanko Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Xianhui Wang; Jason Wong; Christopher J Sevinsky; Leila Kokabee; Faiza Khan; Yan Sun; Douglas S Conklin Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Nathan A Whitman; Zhi-Wei Lin; Thomas J DiProspero; Julie C McIntosh; Matthew R Lockett Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 6.986