Literature DB >> 25772602

Phonological simplifications, apraxia of speech and the interaction between phonological and phonetic processing.

Claudia Galluzzi1, Ivana Bureca1, Cecilia Guariglia2, Cristina Romani3.   

Abstract

Research on aphasia has struggled to identify apraxia of speech (AoS) as an independent deficit affecting a processing level separate from phonological assembly and motor implementation. This is because AoS is characterized by both phonological and phonetic errors and, therefore, can be interpreted as a combination of deficits at the phonological and the motoric level rather than as an independent impairment. We apply novel psycholinguistic analyses to the perceptually phonological errors made by 24 Italian aphasic patients. We show that only patients with relative high rate (>10%) of phonetic errors make sound errors which simplify the phonology of the target. Moreover, simplifications are strongly associated with other variables indicative of articulatory difficulties - such as a predominance of errors on consonants rather than vowels - but not with other measures - such as rate of words reproduced correctly or rates of lexical errors. These results indicate that sound errors cannot arise at a single phonological level because they are different in different patients. Instead, different patterns: (1) provide evidence for separate impairments and the existence of a level of articulatory planning/programming intermediate between phonological selection and motor implementation; (2) validate AoS as an independent impairment at this level, characterized by phonetic errors and phonological simplifications; (3) support the claim that linguistic principles of complexity have an articulatory basis since they only apply in patients with associated articulatory difficulties.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apraxia Of Speech; Conduction aphasia; Markedness; Phonological impairments; Phonological simplifications; Phonological/phonetic interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25772602     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  11 in total

1.  Integrating SLAM with existing evidence: Comment on Walker and Hickok (2015).

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  A Multivariate Analytic Approach to the Differential Diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Alexandra Basilakos; Grigori Yourganov; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Daniel Fogerty; Chris Rorden; Lynda Feenaughty; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Identification and Remediation of Phonological and Motor Errors in Acquired Sound Production Impairment.

Authors:  Adam Buchwald; Bernadine Gagnon; Michele Miozzo
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Mapping articulatory and grammatical subcomponents of fluency deficits in post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Amanda E Kraft; Denise Y Harvey; Adelyn R Brecher; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Contribution of acoustic analysis to the detection of vocoid epenthesis in apraxia of speech and other motor speech disorders.

Authors:  Marion Bourqui; Michaela Pernon; Cécile Fougeron; Marina Laganaro
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Investigating the origin of nonfluency in aphasia: A path modeling approach to neuropsychology.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Complexity in articulatory and segmental levels of production.

Authors:  Adam Buchwald
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017 Oct - Dec       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  Evaluating quantitative and conceptual models of speech production: how does SLAM fare?

Authors:  Grant M Walker; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

9.  Vowel Formant Dispersion Reflects Severity of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Elena Galkina; Alexandra Basilakos; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.773

10.  Examining speech motor planning difficulties in apraxia of speech and aphasia via the sequential production of phonetically similar words.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas; Pélagie M Beeson; Brad H Story; Kenneth I Forster
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.