Neil V Shah1, Richard Gold2,3, Qurratul-Ain Dar2, Bassel G Diebo2, Carl B Paulino2,4, Qais Naziri2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Ave, MSC 30, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA. neilvshahmd@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Ave, MSC 30, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA. 3. School of Medicine, Saint George's University, True Blue, West Indies, Grenada. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While limited to case reports or small case series, emerging evidence advocates the inclusion of smartphone-interfacing mobile platforms and wearable technologies, consisting of internet-powered mobile and wearable devices that interface with smartphones, in the orthopaedic surgery practice. The purpose of this review is to investigate the relevance and impact of this technology in orthopaedic surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Smartphone-interfacing mobile platforms and wearable technologies are capable of improving the patients' quality of life as well as the extent of their therapeutic engagement, while promoting the orthopaedic surgeons' abilities and level of care. Offered advantages include improvements in diagnosis and examination, preoperative templating and planning, and intraoperative assistance, as well as postoperative monitoring and rehabilitation. Supplemental surgical exposure, through haptic feedback and realism of audio and video, may add another perspective to these innovations by simulating the operative environment and potentially adding a virtual tactile feature to the operator's visual experience. Although encouraging in the field of orthopaedic surgery, surgeons should be cautious when using smartphone-interfacing mobile platforms and wearable technologies, given the lack of a current academic governing board certification and clinical practice validation processes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While limited to case reports or small case series, emerging evidence advocates the inclusion of smartphone-interfacing mobile platforms and wearable technologies, consisting of internet-powered mobile and wearable devices that interface with smartphones, in the orthopaedic surgery practice. The purpose of this review is to investigate the relevance and impact of this technology in orthopaedic surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Smartphone-interfacing mobile platforms and wearable technologies are capable of improving the patients' quality of life as well as the extent of their therapeutic engagement, while promoting the orthopaedic surgeons' abilities and level of care. Offered advantages include improvements in diagnosis and examination, preoperative templating and planning, and intraoperative assistance, as well as postoperative monitoring and rehabilitation. Supplemental surgical exposure, through haptic feedback and realism of audio and video, may add another perspective to these innovations by simulating the operative environment and potentially adding a virtual tactile feature to the operator's visual experience. Although encouraging in the field of orthopaedic surgery, surgeons should be cautious when using smartphone-interfacing mobile platforms and wearable technologies, given the lack of a current academic governing board certification and clinical practice validation processes.
Authors: Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren; Sara Cabanillas-Barea; César Hidalgo-García; Pablo Fanlo-Mazas; María Orosia Lucha-López; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno Journal: J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil Date: 2019 Impact factor: 1.398
Authors: Steven Milanese; Susan Gordon; Petra Buettner; Carol Flavell; Sally Ruston; Damien Coe; William O'Sullivan; Steven McCormack Journal: Man Ther Date: 2014-06-04
Authors: Anton F Lenssen; Ellen M van Dam; Yvonne H F Crijns; Mark Verhey; Ruud J T Geesink; Piet A van den Brandt; Rob A de Bie Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2007-08-17 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Russell R Russo; Matthew B Burn; Sabir K Ismaily; Brayden J Gerrie; Shuyang Han; Jerry Alexander; Christopher Lenherr; Philip C Noble; Joshua D Harris; Patrick C McCulloch Journal: J Exp Orthop Date: 2017-09-07