Literature DB >> 34729710

Smart Technology and Orthopaedic Surgery: Current Concepts Regarding the Impact of Smartphones and Wearable Technology on Our Patients and Practice.

Neil V Shah1, Richard Gold2,3, Qurratul-Ain Dar2, Bassel G Diebo2, Carl B Paulino2,4, Qais Naziri2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While limited to case reports or small case series, emerging evidence advocates the inclusion of smartphone-interfacing mobile platforms and wearable technologies, consisting of internet-powered mobile and wearable devices that interface with smartphones, in the orthopaedic surgery practice. The purpose of this review is to investigate the relevance and impact of this technology in orthopaedic surgery. RECENT
FINDINGS: Smartphone-interfacing mobile platforms and wearable technologies are capable of improving the patients' quality of life as well as the extent of their therapeutic engagement, while promoting the orthopaedic surgeons' abilities and level of care. Offered advantages include improvements in diagnosis and examination, preoperative templating and planning, and intraoperative assistance, as well as postoperative monitoring and rehabilitation. Supplemental surgical exposure, through haptic feedback and realism of audio and video, may add another perspective to these innovations by simulating the operative environment and potentially adding a virtual tactile feature to the operator's visual experience. Although encouraging in the field of orthopaedic surgery, surgeons should be cautious when using smartphone-interfacing mobile platforms and wearable technologies, given the lack of a current academic governing board certification and clinical practice validation processes.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Orthopaedic surgery; Sensors; Smart technology; Smartphone; Wearable technology

Year:  2021        PMID: 34729710      PMCID: PMC8733100          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-021-09723-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  48 in total

1.  Physical examination of the knee.

Authors:  C L Mendelsohn; G D Paiement
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.907

2.  Evaluation of knee range of motion: Correlation between measurements using a universal goniometer and a smartphone goniometric application.

Authors:  Rafael Aparecido Dos Santos; Viviane Derhon; Michelle Brandalize; Danielle Brandalize; Luciano Pavan Rossi
Journal:  J Bodyw Mov Ther       Date:  2016-11-17

3.  Validity and reliability of two Smartphone applications to measure the lower and upper cervical spine range of motion in subjects with chronic cervical pain.

Authors:  Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren; Sara Cabanillas-Barea; César Hidalgo-García; Pablo Fanlo-Mazas; María Orosia Lucha-López; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.398

4.  Within-day reliability of shoulder range of motion measurement with a smartphone.

Authors:  Seung Han Shin; Du Hyun Ro; O-Sung Lee; Joo Han Oh; Sae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-03-13

5.  Reliability and concurrent validity of knee angle measurement: smart phone app versus universal goniometer used by experienced and novice clinicians.

Authors:  Steven Milanese; Susan Gordon; Petra Buettner; Carol Flavell; Sally Ruston; Damien Coe; William O'Sullivan; Steven McCormack
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-06-04

6.  Visual Interpretation of Plain Radiographs in Orthopaedics Using Eye-Tracking Technology.

Authors:  Jessica Hanley; David Warren; Natalie Glass; Daniel Tranel; Matthew Karam; Joseph Buckwalter
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

Review 7.  Connected orthopedics and trauma surgery: New perspectives.

Authors:  Nicolas Reina
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 2.256

8.  Reproducibility of goniometric measurement of the knee in the in-hospital phase following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anton F Lenssen; Ellen M van Dam; Yvonne H F Crijns; Mark Verhey; Ruud J T Geesink; Piet A van den Brandt; Rob A de Bie
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Is digital photography an accurate and precise method for measuring range of motion of the hip and knee?

Authors:  Russell R Russo; Matthew B Burn; Sabir K Ismaily; Brayden J Gerrie; Shuyang Han; Jerry Alexander; Christopher Lenherr; Philip C Noble; Joshua D Harris; Patrick C McCulloch
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-09-07

10.  Accuracy and reliability of knee goniometry methods.

Authors:  Graeme Ethan Hancock; Tracey Hepworth; Kevin Wembridge
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.