Natalya C Maisel1, Sally Haskell, Patricia M Hayes, Vidhya Balasubramanian, Anupama Torgal, Lakshmi Ananth, Fay Saechao, Samina Iqbal, Ciaran S Phibbs, Susan M Frayne. 1. *Women's Health Evaluation Initiative (WHEI), Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA †Women's Health Services, VA Central Office, Washington, DC ‡Health Economics Resource Center §Women's Health Service, Medical Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA ∥Division of General Medical Disciplines ¶Department of Pediatrics #Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) primary care providers (PCPs) often see few women, making it challenging to maintain proficiency in women's health (WH). Therefore, VHA in 2010 established Designated WH Providers, who would maintain proficiency in comprehensive WH care and be preferentially assigned women patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate early implementation of this national policy. METHODS: At each VHA health care system (N=140), the Women Veterans Program Manager completed a Fiscal Year 2012 workforce capacity assessment (response rate, 100%), representing the first time the national Designated WH Provider workforce had been identified. Assessment data were linked to administrative data. RESULTS: Of all VHA PCPs, 23% were Designated WH Providers; 100% of health care systems and 83% of community clinics had at least 1 Designated WH Provider. On average, women veterans comprised 19% (SD=27%) of the patients Designated WH Providers saw in primary care, versus 5% (SD=7%) for Other PCPs (P<0.001). For women veterans using primary care (N=313,033), new patients were less likely to see a Designated WH Provider than established women veteran patients (52% vs. 64%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VHA has achieved its goal of a Designated WH Provider in every health care system, and is approaching its goal of a Designated WH Provider at every hospital/community clinic. Designated WH Providers see more women than do Other PCPs. However, as the volume of women patients remains low for many providers, attention to alternative approaches to maintaining proficiency may prove necessary, and barriers to assigning new women patients to Designated WH Providers merit attention.
BACKGROUND: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) primary care providers (PCPs) often see few women, making it challenging to maintain proficiency in women's health (WH). Therefore, VHA in 2010 established Designated WH Providers, who would maintain proficiency in comprehensive WH care and be preferentially assigned womenpatients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate early implementation of this national policy. METHODS: At each VHA health care system (N=140), the Women Veterans Program Manager completed a Fiscal Year 2012 workforce capacity assessment (response rate, 100%), representing the first time the national Designated WH Provider workforce had been identified. Assessment data were linked to administrative data. RESULTS: Of all VHA PCPs, 23% were Designated WH Providers; 100% of health care systems and 83% of community clinics had at least 1 Designated WH Provider. On average, women veterans comprised 19% (SD=27%) of the patients Designated WH Providers saw in primary care, versus 5% (SD=7%) for Other PCPs (P<0.001). For women veterans using primary care (N=313,033), new patients were less likely to see a Designated WH Provider than established women veteran patients (52% vs. 64%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VHA has achieved its goal of a Designated WH Provider in every health care system, and is approaching its goal of a Designated WH Provider at every hospital/community clinic. Designated WH Providers see more women than do Other PCPs. However, as the volume of womenpatients remains low for many providers, attention to alternative approaches to maintaining proficiency may prove necessary, and barriers to assigning new womenpatients to Designated WH Providers merit attention.
Authors: Jonathan G Shaw; Vilija R Joyce; Susan K Schmitt; Susan M Frayne; Kate A Shaw; Beate Danielsen; Rachel Kimerling; Steven M Asch; Ciaran S Phibbs Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Jessica Y Breland; Michelle S Wong; Susan M Frayne; Katherine J Hoggatt; W Neil Steers; Fay Saechao; Donna L Washington Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2019-06-25
Authors: Claire Than; Emmeline Chuang; Donna L Washington; Jack Needleman; Ismelda Canelo; Lisa S Meredith; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2020-02-22
Authors: Colleen P Judge; Xinhua Zhao; Florentina E Sileanu; Maria K Mor; Sonya Borrero Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Rachel Schwartz; Susan M Frayne; Sarah Friedman; Yasmin Romodan; Eric Berg; Sally G Haskell; Jonathan G Shaw Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 5.128