Rachel Schwartz1,2, Susan M Frayne3,4, Sarah Friedman3,5, Yasmin Romodan3, Eric Berg3, Sally G Haskell6,7,8, Jonathan G Shaw3,4. 1. VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. raschwartz@stanford.edu. 2. WellMD Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. raschwartz@stanford.edu. 3. VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 4. Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 5. School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA. 6. Women's Health Services, VA Central Office, Washington, DC, USA. 7. VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, CT, USA. 8. Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When an experienced provider opts to leave a healthcare workforce (attrition), there are significant costs, both direct and indirect. Turnover of healthcare providers is underreported and understudied, despite evidence that it negatively impacts care delivery and negatively impacts working conditions for remaining providers. In the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system, attrition of women's health primary care providers (WH-PCPs) threatens a specially trained workforce; it is unknown what factors contribute to, or protect against, their attrition. OBJECTIVE: Based on evidence that clinic environment, adequate support resources, and workload affect provider burnout and intent to leave, we explored if such clinic characteristics predict attrition of WH-PCPs in the VA, to identify protective factors. DESIGN: This analysis drew on two waves of existing national VA survey data to examine predictors of WH-PCP attrition, via logistic regression. PARTICIPANTS: All 2,259 providers from 140 facilities VA-wide who were WH-PCPs on September 30, 2016. MAIN MEASURES: The dependent variable was WH-PCP attrition in the following year. Candidate predictors were clinic environment (working in: a comprehensive women's health center, a limited women's health clinic, a general primary care clinic, or multiple clinic environments), availability of co-located specialty support resources (mental health, social work, clinical pharmacy), provider characteristics (gender, professional degree), and clinic workload (clinic sessions per week). KEY RESULTS: Working exclusively in a comprehensive women's health center uniquely predicted significantly lower risk of WH-PCP attrition (adjusted odds ratio 0.40; CI 0.19-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive women's health center clinical context may promote retention of this specially trained primary care workforce. Exploring potential mechanisms-e.g., shared mission, appropriate support to meet patients' needs, or a cohesive team environment-may inform broader efforts to retain front-line providers.
BACKGROUND: When an experienced provider opts to leave a healthcare workforce (attrition), there are significant costs, both direct and indirect. Turnover of healthcare providers is underreported and understudied, despite evidence that it negatively impacts care delivery and negatively impacts working conditions for remaining providers. In the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system, attrition of women's health primary care providers (WH-PCPs) threatens a specially trained workforce; it is unknown what factors contribute to, or protect against, their attrition. OBJECTIVE: Based on evidence that clinic environment, adequate support resources, and workload affect provider burnout and intent to leave, we explored if such clinic characteristics predict attrition of WH-PCPs in the VA, to identify protective factors. DESIGN: This analysis drew on two waves of existing national VA survey data to examine predictors of WH-PCP attrition, via logistic regression. PARTICIPANTS: All 2,259 providers from 140 facilities VA-wide who were WH-PCPs on September 30, 2016. MAIN MEASURES: The dependent variable was WH-PCP attrition in the following year. Candidate predictors were clinic environment (working in: a comprehensive women's health center, a limited women's health clinic, a general primary care clinic, or multiple clinic environments), availability of co-located specialty support resources (mental health, social work, clinical pharmacy), provider characteristics (gender, professional degree), and clinic workload (clinic sessions per week). KEY RESULTS: Working exclusively in a comprehensive women's health center uniquely predicted significantly lower risk of WH-PCP attrition (adjusted odds ratio 0.40; CI 0.19-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive women's health center clinical context may promote retention of this specially trained primary care workforce. Exploring potential mechanisms-e.g., shared mission, appropriate support to meet patients' needs, or a cohesive team environment-may inform broader efforts to retain front-line providers.
Authors: Eva Pfarrwaller; Johanna Sommer; Christopher Chung; Hubert Maisonneuve; Mathieu Nendaz; Noëlle Junod Perron; Dagmar M Haller Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: J Nwando Olayiwola; Rachel Willard-Grace; Kate Dubé; Danielle Hessler; Rebecca Shunk; Kevin Grumbach; Laura Gottlieb Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2018
Authors: Christian D Helfrich; Joseph A Simonetti; Walter L Clinton; Gordon B Wood; Leslie Taylor; Gordon Schectman; Richard Stark; Lisa V Rubenstein; Stephan D Fihn; Karin M Nelson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Mark Linzer; Linda Baier Manwell; Eric S Williams; James A Bobula; Roger L Brown; Anita B Varkey; Bernice Man; Julia E McMurray; Ann Maguire; Barbara Horner-Ibler; Mark D Schwartz Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Anna Sansom; Rohini Terry; Emily Fletcher; Chris Salisbury; Linda Long; Suzanne H Richards; Alex Aylward; Jo Welsman; Laura Sims; John L Campbell; Sarah G Dean Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Eric A Apaydin; David C Mohr; Alison B Hamilton; Danielle E Rose; Sally Haskell; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 6.473