Literature DB >> 30198185

Selection of Higher Risk Pregnancies into Veterans Health Administration Programs: Discoveries from Linked Department of Veterans Affairs and California Birth Data.

Jonathan G Shaw1,2,3, Vilija R Joyce4, Susan K Schmitt4,5, Susan M Frayne1,2, Kate A Shaw3, Beate Danielsen6, Rachel Kimerling2,7, Steven M Asch1,2, Ciaran S Phibbs2,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe variation in payer and outcomes in Veterans' births. DATA/
SETTING: Secondary data analyses of deliveries in California, 2000-2012. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective, population-based study of all live births to Veterans (confirmed via U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) enrollment records), to identify payer and variations in outcomes among: (1) Veterans using VA coverage and (2) Veteran vs. all other births. We calculated odds ratios (aOR) adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, education, and obstetric demographics.
METHODS: We anonymously linked VA administrative data for all female VA enrollees with California birth records. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: From 2000 to 2012, we identified 17,495 births to Veterans. VA covered 8.6 percent (1,508), Medicaid 17.3 percent, and Private insurance 47.6 percent. Veterans who relied on VA health coverage had more preeclampsia (aOR 1.4, CI 1.0-1.8) and more cesarean births (aOR 1.2, CI 1.0-1.3), and, despite similar prematurity, trended toward more neonatal intensive care (NICU) admissions (aOR 1.2, CI 1.0-1.4) compared to Veterans using other (non-Medicaid) coverage. Overall, Veterans' birth outcomes (all-payer) mirrored California's birth outcomes, with the exception of excess NICU care (aOR 1.15, CI 1.1-1.2).
CONCLUSIONS: VA covers a higher risk fraction of Veterans' births, justifying maternal care coordination and attention to the maternal-fetal impacts of Veterans' comorbidities. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  California; Maternal care; Veterans; health services; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30198185      PMCID: PMC6235819          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  55 in total

1.  Evaluating the Veterans Choice Program: Lessons for Developing a High-performing Integrated Network.

Authors:  Kristin M Mattocks; Baligh Yehia
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Interpregnancy interval after live birth or pregnancy termination and estimated risk of preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  B Z Shachar; J A Mayo; D J Lyell; R J Baer; L L Jeliffe-Pawlowski; D K Stevenson; G M Shaw
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Air pollution, inflammation and preterm birth: a potential mechanistic link.

Authors:  Felipe Vadillo-Ortega; Alvaro Osornio-Vargas; Miatta A Buxton; Brisa N Sánchez; Leonora Rojas-Bracho; Martin Viveros-Alcaráz; Marisol Castillo-Castrejón; Jorge Beltrán-Montoya; Daniel G Brown; Marie S O'Neill
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Five-year trends in women veterans' use of VA maternity benefits, 2008-2012.

Authors:  Kristin M Mattocks; Susan Frayne; Ciaran S Phibbs; Elizabeth M Yano; Laurie Zephyrin; Holly Shryock; Sally Haskell; Jodie Katon; J Cherry Sullivan; Linda Weinreb; Christine Ulbricht; Lori A Bastian
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

6.  Women in Combat: Framing the Issues of Health and Health Research for America's Servicewomen.

Authors:  Kate McGraw; Tracey Perez Koehlmoos; Elspeth Cam Ritchie
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.

Authors:  Patricia M Dietz; Lucinda J England; William M Callaghan; Michelle Pearl; Megan L Wier; Martin Kharrazi
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.980

8.  Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Approach to Cultural Competence Training: The Veterans Affairs' "Caring for Women Veterans" Program.

Authors:  Annie B Fox; Alison B Hamilton; Susan M Frayne; Shannon Wiltsey-Stirman; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Diane Carney; Brooke A L Di Leone; Jennifer M Gierisch; Karen M Goldstein; Yasmin Romodan; Anne G Sadler; Elizabeth M Yano; Ellen F Yee; Dawne Vogt
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  The VA Women's Health Practice-Based Research Network: amplifying women veterans' voices in VA research.

Authors:  Susan M Frayne; Diane V Carney; Lori Bastian; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Anne Sadler; Ruth Klap; Ciaran S Phibbs; Rachel Kimerling; Dawne Vogt; Ellen F Yee; Julia Y Lin; Elizabeth M Yano
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Sleep duration, vital exhaustion, and odds of spontaneous preterm birth: a case-control study.

Authors:  Sandhya Kajeepeta; Sixto E Sanchez; Bizu Gelaye; Chunfang Qiu; Yasmin V Barrios; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  2 in total

1.  HSR Commentary: Linking VA and Non-VA Data to Address Important US Veteran Health Services Research Issues.

Authors:  Denise M Hynes; Matthew L Maciejewski; David Atkins
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Differences in body mass index based on self-reported versus measured data from women veterans.

Authors:  Jessica Y Breland; Vilija R Joyce; Susan M Frayne; Ciaran Phibbs
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2020-06-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.