Literature DB >> 25766390

The sensitivity of cartilage contact pressures in the knee joint to the size and shape of an anatomically shaped meniscal implant.

M Khoshgoftar1, A C T Vrancken2, T G van Tienen1, P Buma3, D Janssen1, N Verdonschot4.   

Abstract

Since meniscal geometry affects the cartilage contact pressures, it is essential to carefully define the geometry of the synthetic meniscal implant that we developed. Recently, six independent modes of size- and shape-related geometry variation were identified through 3D statistical shape modeling (SSM) of the medial meniscus. However, this model did not provide information on the functional importance of these geometry characteristics. Therefore, in this study finite element simulations were performed to determine the influence of anatomically-based meniscal implant size and shape variations on knee cartilage contact pressures. Finite element simulations of the knee joint were performed for a total medial meniscectomy, an allograft, the average implant geometry, six implant sizes and ten shape variations. The geometries of the allograft and all implant variations were based on the meniscus SSM. Cartilage contact pressures and implant tensile strains were evaluated in full extension under 1200N of axial compression. The average implant induced cartilage peak pressures intermediate between the allograft and meniscectomy and also reduced the cartilage area subjected to pressures >5MPa compared to the meniscectomy. The smaller implant sizes resulted in lower cartilage peak pressures and compressive strains than the allograft, yet high implant tensile strains were observed. Shape modes 2, 3 and 6 affected the cartilage contact stresses but to a lesser extent than the size variations. Shape modes 4 and 5 did not result in changes of the cartilage stress levels. The present study indicates that cartilage contact mechanics are more sensitive to implant size than to implant shape. Down-sizing the implant resulted in more favorable contact mechanics, but caused excessive material strains. Further evaluations are necessary to balance cartilage contact pressures and material strains to ensure cartilage protection and longevity of the implant.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage contact pressure; Finite element method; Knee meniscus; Meniscal implant geometry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25766390     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  Finite element simulation of articular contact mechanics with quadratic tetrahedral elements.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Benjamin J Ellis; David S Rawlins; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  * The Ovine Model for Meniscus Tissue Engineering: Considerations of Anatomy, Function, Implantation, and Evaluation.

Authors:  Andrzej Brzezinski; Salim A Ghodbane; Jay M Patel; Barbara A Perry; Charles J Gatt; Michael G Dunn
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 3.  Meniscus tear surgery and meniscus replacement.

Authors:  Javier Vaquero; Francisco Forriol
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-05-19

4.  Large correction in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with resultant joint-line obliquity induces excessive shear stress on the articular cartilage.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nakayama; Steffen Schröter; Chie Yamamoto; Tomoya Iseki; Ryo Kanto; Kenji Kurosaka; Shunichiro Kambara; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masaru Higa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The effect of articular geometry features identified using statistical shape modelling on knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Allison L Clouthier; Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Darryl G Thelen; Kevin J Deluzio; Michael J Rainbow
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  The influence of a change in the meniscus cross-sectional shape on the medio-lateral translation of the knee joint and meniscal extrusion.

Authors:  Piotr Luczkiewicz; Karol Daszkiewicz; Wojciech Witkowski; Jacek Chróścielewski; Tomasz Ferenc; Boguslaw Baczkowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The implications of non-anatomical positioning of a meniscus prosthesis on predicted human knee joint biomechanics.

Authors:  Hamid Naghibi; Dennis Janssen; Ton van den Boogaard; Tony van Tienen; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  An anatomically shaped medial meniscus prosthesis is able to partially restore the contact mechanics of the meniscectomized knee joint.

Authors:  Branco S van Minnen; Albert J van der Veen; Sebastiaan A W van de Groes; Nico J J Verdonschot; Tony G van Tienen
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-09-07

9.  Open Knee: Open Source Modeling and Simulation in Knee Biomechanics.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.757

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.