Literature DB >> 30850334

The effect of articular geometry features identified using statistical shape modelling on knee biomechanics.

Allison L Clouthier1, Colin R Smith2, Michael F Vignos2, Darryl G Thelen2, Kevin J Deluzio3, Michael J Rainbow3.   

Abstract

Articular geometry in the knee varies widely among people which has implications for risk of injury and pathology. The goals of this work were to develop a framework to systematically vary geometry in a multibody knee model and to use this framework to investigate the effect of morphological features on dynamic knee kinematics and contact mechanics. A statistical shape model of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints was created from magnetic resonance images of 14 asymptomatic knees. The shape model was then used to generate 37 unique multibody knee models based on -3 to +3 standard deviations of the scores for the first six principal components identified. Each multibody model was then incorporated into a lower extremity musculoskeletal model and the Concurrent Optimization of Muscle Activations and Kinematics (COMAK) routine was used to simulate knee mechanics for overground walking. Changes in articular geometry affected knee function, resulting in differences up to 17° in orientation, 8 mm in translation, 0.7 BW in contact force, and 2.0 MPa in mean cartilage contact pressure. Understanding the relationship between shape and function in a joint could provide insight into the mechanisms behind injury and pathology and the variability in response to treatment.
Copyright © 2019 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee kinematics; Knee mechanics; Musculoskeletal model; Statistical shape model

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30850334      PMCID: PMC6529205          DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  51 in total

1.  Patellar instability: assessment on MR images by measuring the lateral trochlear inclination-initial experience.

Authors:  Y Carrillon; H Abidi; D Dejour; O Fantino; B Moyen; V A Tran-Minh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Patellar kinematics, part II: the influence of the depth of the trochlear groove in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  C M Powers
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-10

Review 3.  Sources of anterior knee pain.

Authors:  Roland M Biedert; Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.182

4.  Multibody dynamic simulation of knee contact mechanics.

Authors:  Yanhong Bei; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 5.  Conditioning of cartilage during normal activities is an important factor in the development of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  B B Seedhom
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Patellofemoral stress during walking in persons with and without patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Jacklyn Heino Brechter; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Reduction of medial compartment loads with valgus bracing of the osteoarthritic knee.

Authors:  Fabian E Pollo; James C Otis; Sherry I Backus; Russell F Warren; Thomas L Wickiewicz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Radiographic measures in subjects who are asymptomatic and subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Judi Laprade; Elsie Culham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The effects of trochlear groove geometry on patellofemoral joint stability--a computer model study.

Authors:  A Jafaril; F Farahmand; A Meghdari
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.617

10.  Is there a relationship between anterior knee pain and femoral trochlear dysplasia? Assessment of lateral trochlear inclination by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Selçuk Keser; Ahmet Savranlar; Ahmet Bayar; Ahmet Ege; Egemen Turhan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  6 in total

1.  The effect of modelling parameters in the development and validation of knee joint models on ligament mechanics: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sara Sadat Farshidfar; Joseph Cadman; Danny Deng; Richard Appleyard; Danè Dabirrahmani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Knee extension moment arm variations relate to mechanical function in walking and running.

Authors:  Mitchell G A Wheatley; Darryl G Thelen; Kevin J Deluzio; Michael J Rainbow
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  Predicting Knee Joint Instability Using a Tibio-Femoral Statistical Shape Model.

Authors:  Pietro Cerveri; Antonella Belfatto; Alfonso Manzotti
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-17

4.  Real-Time Prediction of Joint Forces by Motion Capture and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Georgios Giarmatzis; Evangelia I Zacharaki; Konstantinos Moustakas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Investigating acute changes in osteoarthritic cartilage by integrating biomechanics and statistical shape models of bone: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Anthony A Gatti; Peter J Keir; Michael D Noseworthy; Monica R Maly
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Statistical-Shape Prediction of Lower Limb Kinematics During Cycling, Squatting, Lunging, and Stepping-Are Bone Geometry Predictors Helpful?

Authors:  Joris De Roeck; Kate Duquesne; Jan Van Houcke; Emmanuel A Audenaert
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.