Literature DB >> 25761331

Perception of physical stability and center of mass of 3-D objects.

Steven A Cholewiak1, Roland W Fleming2, Manish Singh1.   

Abstract

Humans can judge from vision alone whether an object is physically stable or not. Such judgments allow observers to predict the physical behavior of objects, and hence to guide their motor actions. We investigated the visual estimation of physical stability of 3-D objects (shown in stereoscopically viewed rendered scenes) and how it relates to visual estimates of their center of mass (COM). In Experiment 1, observers viewed an object near the edge of a table and adjusted its tilt to the perceived critical angle, i.e., the tilt angle at which the object was seen as equally likely to fall or return to its upright stable position. In Experiment 2, observers visually localized the COM of the same set of objects. In both experiments, observers' settings were compared to physical predictions based on the objects' geometry. In both tasks, deviations from physical predictions were, on average, relatively small. More detailed analyses of individual observers' settings in the two tasks, however, revealed mutual inconsistencies between observers' critical-angle and COM settings. The results suggest that observers did not use their COM estimates in a physically correct manner when making visual judgments of physical stability.
© 2015 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D shape; center of mass; critical angle; perceived object stability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25761331      PMCID: PMC4323039          DOI: 10.1167/15.2.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  16 in total

1.  Is this object balanced or unbalanced? Judgments are on the safe side.

Authors:  Françoise Samuel; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects.

Authors:  M McCloskey; A Caramazza; B Green
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Localization of shapes: eye movements and perception compared.

Authors:  Dhanraj Vishwanath; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Representing statics as forces in equilibrium.

Authors:  J J Freyd; T M Pantzer; J L Cheng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-12

6.  Center of mass perception and inertial frames of reference.

Authors:  G P Bingham; M M Muchisky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-11

7.  Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion.

Authors:  M K Kaiser; D R Proffitt; K Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding.

Authors:  Peter W Battaglia; Jessica B Hamrick; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Understanding natural dynamics.

Authors:  D R Proffitt; D L Gilden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Perceived object stability depends on multisensory estimates of gravity.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Roland W Fleming; Manish Singh; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Is apparent instability a guiding feature in visual search?

Authors:  Yung-Hao Yang; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-06-16

2.  Visual perception of shape altered by inferred causal history.

Authors:  Patrick Spröte; Filipp Schmidt; Roland W Fleming
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation.

Authors:  Mohsen Sadeghi; Hannah R Sheahan; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Visual dynamics cues in learning complex physical interactions.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Paneed F Jalili
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Correction of Visual Perception Based on Neuro-Fuzzy Learning for the Humanoid Robot TEO.

Authors:  Juan Hernandez-Vicen; Santiago Martinez; Juan Miguel Garcia-Haro; Carlos Balaguer
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.