Thomas Ach1, Elen Tolstik2, Jeffrey D Messinger3, Anna V Zarubina3, Rainer Heintzmann2, Christine A Curcio3. 1. University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Ophthalmology, Birmingham, Alabama, United States 2University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Ophthalmology, Würzburg, Germany. 2. Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, Jena, Germany 5King's College London, Randall Division of Cell & Molecular Biophysics, London, United Kingdom. 3. University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Ophthalmology, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lipofuscin (LF) and melanolipofuscin (MLF) of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) are the principal sources of autofluorescence (AF) signals in clinical fundus-AF imaging. Few details about the subcellular distribution of AF organelles in AMD are available. We describe the impact of aging and AMD on RPE morphology revealed by the distribution of AF LF/MLF granules and actin cytoskeleton in human tissues. METHODS: Thirty-five RPE-Bruch's membrane flatmounts from 35 donors were prepared (postmortem: ≤4 hours). Ex vivo fundus examination at the time of accession revealed either absence of chorioretinal pathologies (10 tissues; mean age: 83.0 ± 2.6 years) or stages of AMD (25 tissues; 85.0 ± 5.8 years): early AMD, geographic atrophy, and late exudative AMD. Retinal pigment epithelium cytoskeleton was labeled with AlexaFluor647-Phalloidin. Tissues were imaged on a spinning-disk fluorescence microscope and a high-resolution structured illumination microscope. RESULTS: Age-related macular degeneration impacts individual RPE cells by (1) lipofuscin redistribution by (i) degranulation (granule-by-granule loss) and/or (ii) aggregation and apparent shedding into the extracellular space; (2) enlarged RPE cell area and conversion from convex to irregular and sometimes concave polygons; and (3) cytoskeleton derangement including separations and breaks around subretinal deposits, thickening, and stress fibers. CONCLUSIONS: We report an extensive and systematic en face analysis of LF/MLF-AF in AMD eyes. Redistribution and loss of AF granules are among the earliest AMD changes and could reduce fundus AF signal attributable to RPE at these locations. Data can enhance the interpretation of clinical fundus-AF and provide a basis for future quantitative studies.
PURPOSE:Lipofuscin (LF) and melanolipofuscin (MLF) of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) are the principal sources of autofluorescence (AF) signals in clinical fundus-AF imaging. Few details about the subcellular distribution of AF organelles in AMD are available. We describe the impact of aging and AMD on RPE morphology revealed by the distribution of AF LF/MLF granules and actin cytoskeleton in human tissues. METHODS: Thirty-five RPE-Bruch's membrane flatmounts from 35 donors were prepared (postmortem: ≤4 hours). Ex vivo fundus examination at the time of accession revealed either absence of chorioretinal pathologies (10 tissues; mean age: 83.0 ± 2.6 years) or stages of AMD (25 tissues; 85.0 ± 5.8 years): early AMD, geographic atrophy, and late exudative AMD. Retinal pigment epithelium cytoskeleton was labeled with AlexaFluor647-Phalloidin. Tissues were imaged on a spinning-disk fluorescence microscope and a high-resolution structured illumination microscope. RESULTS: Age-related macular degeneration impacts individual RPE cells by (1) lipofuscin redistribution by (i) degranulation (granule-by-granule loss) and/or (ii) aggregation and apparent shedding into the extracellular space; (2) enlarged RPE cell area and conversion from convex to irregular and sometimes concave polygons; and (3) cytoskeleton derangement including separations and breaks around subretinal deposits, thickening, and stress fibers. CONCLUSIONS: We report an extensive and systematic en face analysis of LF/MLF-AF in AMD eyes. Redistribution and loss of AF granules are among the earliest AMD changes and could reduce fundus AF signal attributable to RPE at these locations. Data can enhance the interpretation of clinical fundus-AF and provide a basis for future quantitative studies.
Authors: Aristomenis Thanos; Yuki Morizane; Yusuke Murakami; Andrea Giani; Dimosthenis Mantopoulos; Maki Kayama; Mi In Roh; Norman Michaud; Basil Pawlyk; Michael Sandberg; Lucy H Young; Joan W Miller; Demetrios G Vavvas Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2012-03-17 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: G Malek; L V Johnson; B E Mace; P Saloupis; D E Schmechel; D W Rickman; C A Toth; P M Sullivan; C Bowes Rickman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-08-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Thomas Ach; Carrie Huisingh; Gerald McGwin; Jeffrey D Messinger; Tianjiao Zhang; Mark J Bentley; Danielle B Gutierrez; Zsolt Ablonczy; R Theodore Smith; Kenneth R Sloan; Christine A Curcio Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Chandrakumar Balaratnasingam; Jeffrey D Messinger; Kenneth R Sloan; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Emma C Zanzottera; Jeffrey D Messinger; Thomas Ach; R Theodore Smith; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Yuehong Tong; Tal Ben Ami; Sungmin Hong; Rainer Heintzmann; Guido Gerig; Zsolt Ablonczy; Christine A Curcio; Thomas Ach; R Theodore Smith Journal: Retina Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Emma C Zanzottera; Thomas Ach; Carrie Huisingh; Jeffrey D Messinger; Richard F Spaide; Christine A Curcio Journal: Retina Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Emma C Zanzottera; Thomas Ach; Carrie Huisingh; Jeffrey D Messinger; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Retina Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Patrick Pallitto; Zsolt Ablonczy; E Ellen Jones; Richard R Drake; Yiannis Koutalos; Rosalie K Crouch; John Donello; Julia Herrmann Journal: Photochem Photobiol Sci Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.982