Literature DB >> 25758451

Contemporary management of median arcuate ligament syndrome provides early symptom improvement.

Jesse A Columbo1, Thadeus Trus2, Brian Nolan3, Philip Goodney3, Eva Rzucidlo3, Richard Powell3, Daniel Walsh3, David Stone3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Optimal diagnosis and management of median arcuate ligament (MAL) syndrome (MALS) remains unclear in contemporary practice. The advent and evolution of laparoscopic and endovascular techniques has redirected management toward a less invasive therapeutic algorithm. This study examined our contemporary outcomes of patients treated for MALS.
METHODS: All patients treated for MALS at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center from 2000 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics and comorbidities were recorded. Freedom from symptoms and freedom from reintervention were the primary end points. Return to work or school was assessed. Follow-up by clinic visits and telephone allowed quantitative comparisons among the patients.
RESULTS: During the study interval, 21 patients (24% male), with a median age of 42 years, were treated for MALS. All patients complained of abdominal pain in the presence of a celiac stenosis, 16 (76%) also reported weight loss at the time of presentation, and 57% had a concomitant psychiatric history. Diagnostic imaging most commonly used included duplex ultrasound (81%), computed tomography angiography (66%), angiography (57%), and magnetic resonance angiography (5%). Fourteen patients (67%) underwent multiple diagnostic studies. All patients underwent initial laparoscopic MAL release. Seven patients (33%) underwent subsequent celiac stent placement in the setting of recurrent or unresolved symptoms with persistent celiac stenosis at a mean interval of 49 days. Two patients required surgical bypass after an endovascular intervention failed. The 6-month freedom from symptoms was 75% and freedom from reintervention was 64%. Eighteen patients (81%) reported early symptom improvement and weight gain, and 66% were able to return to work.
CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary treatment approach using initial laparoscopic release and subsequent stent placement and bypass surgery provides symptom improvement in most patients treated for MALS. The potential placebo effect, however, remains uncertain. A significant minority of patients will require reintervention, justifying longitudinal surveillance and prudent patient selection. Patients can anticipate functional recovery, weight gain, and return to work with treatment.
Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25758451      PMCID: PMC5292272          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  19 in total

1.  Ultrasound of the median arcuate ligament syndrome: a new approach to diagnosis.

Authors:  Hannes Gruber; Alexander Loizides; Siegfried Peer; Ingrid Gruber
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.611

2.  Robotic-assisted median arcuate ligament release.

Authors:  Daniel Relles; Neil Moudgill; Atul Rao; Francis Rosato; Paul DiMuzio; Joshua Eisenberg
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Retroperitoneal endoscopic release in the management of celiac artery compression syndrome.

Authors:  André S van Petersen; Bianca H Vriens; Ad B Huisman; Jeroen J Kolkman; Robert H Geelkerken
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Celiac artery compression syndrome managed by laparoscopy.

Authors:  Paolo Baccari; Efrem Civilini; Laura Dordoni; Germano Melissano; Roberto Nicoletti; Roberto Chiesa
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Mesenteric and celiac duplex scanning: a validation study.

Authors:  R M Zwolak; M F Fillinger; D B Walsh; F E LaBombard; A Musson; C E Darling; J L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Laparoscopic versus open celiac ganglionectomy in patients with median arcuate ligament syndrome.

Authors:  Allan W Tulloch; Juan Carlos Jimenez; Peter F Lawrence; Erik P Dutson; Wesley S Moore; David A Rigberg; Brian G Derubertis; William J Quinones-Baldrich
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Median arcuate ligament syndrome in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Grace Z Mak; Christopher Speaker; Kristen Anderson; Colleen Stiles-Shields; Jonathan Lorenz; Tina Drossos; Donald C Liu; Christopher L Skelly
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 8.  Laparoscopic treatment of celiac artery compression syndrome: case series and review of current treatment modalities.

Authors:  Khashayar Vaziri; Eric S Hungness; Erik G Pearson; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Laparoscopic median arcuate ligament release: are we improving symptoms?

Authors:  Kevin M El-Hayek; Jessica Titus; Au Bui; Tara Mastracci; Matthew Kroh
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Late results following operative repair for celiac artery compression syndrome.

Authors:  L M Reilly; A D Ammar; R J Stoney; W K Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  7 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic median arcuate ligament release: 7-year experience from a single tertiary care center.

Authors:  Usah Khrucharoen; Yen-Yi Juo; Yas Sanaiha; Yijun Chen; Juan C Jimenez; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Short- and intermediate-term clinical outcome comparison between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted median arcuate ligament release.

Authors:  Usah Khrucharoen; Yen-Yi Juo; Yijun Chen; Juan C Jimenez; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-21

3.  Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: It Is Not Always Gastritis.

Authors:  Aneesh Kuruvilla; Ghulam Murtaza; Ayesha Cheema; Hafiz Muhammad Sharjeel Arshad
Journal:  J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep       Date:  2017-09-05

4.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Secondary stenting of the celiac trunk after inefficient median arcuate ligament release and reoperation as an alternative to simultaneous hepatic artery reconstruction.

Authors:  Théophile Guilbaud; Jacques Ewald; Olivier Turrini; Jean Robert Delpero
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Hybrid (laparoscopy + stent) treatment of celiac trunk compression syndrome (Dunbar syndrome, median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS)).

Authors:  Maciej Michalik; Natalia Dowgiałło-Wnukiewicz; Paweł Lech; Kaja Majda; Piotr Gutowski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 1.195

6.  Intravascular ultrasound-guided laparoscopic division of the median arcuate ligament.

Authors:  Iman Bayat; Judy Wang; Prahlad Ho; David Bird
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2020-03-03

7.  Robotic Surgery for Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome.

Authors:  Colton Fernstrum; Michael Pryor; G Paul Wright; Andrea M Wolf
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.