Literature DB >> 20630683

Laparoscopic versus open celiac ganglionectomy in patients with median arcuate ligament syndrome.

Allan W Tulloch1, Juan Carlos Jimenez, Peter F Lawrence, Erik P Dutson, Wesley S Moore, David A Rigberg, Brian G Derubertis, William J Quinones-Baldrich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a rare disorder characterized by abdominal pain and compression of the celiac artery. Traditional management consists of open MAL division, with or without arterial reconstruction. We present our outcomes using a laparoscopic approach and compare them to patients treated with open MAL division during the same period.
METHODS: A retrospective medical records review of all patients with MALS treated at the University of California-Los Angeles from January 1999 to 2009 was performed.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients with MALS were treated. All patients underwent an extensive preoperative gastrointestinal (GI) workup with 10 undergoing attempted laparoscopic division of the MAL and celiac ganglion (laparoscopic ganglionectomy [LG]). Two intraoperative conversions were performed for bleeding. Six patients were treated in the open surgery group (open ganglionectomy [OG]). There were no deaths or reoperations in either group. Median time to feeding was 1.0 vs 2.8 days (P≤.05) in the LG and OG groups, respectively, which was statistically significant. Median length of hospitalization was also significantly lower in the LG group compared with the OG group (2.3 vs 7.0 days; P≤.05). Eight patients had LG (100%) and 5 patients had OG (83%) and had immediate symptom resolution (postoperative day 1). Three patients with recurrent symptoms after LG underwent angiography demonstrating persistent celiac stenosis, then an angioplasty was performed. Median follow-up was 14.0 months (2-65 months) for all patients. Three patients who received LG (38%) and 3 patients who received OG (50%) had persistent pain at last follow-up. Six patients in the OG group (100%) and 7 patients in the LG group (88%) had ceased taking chronic oral narcotics at their last follow-up visit.
CONCLUSION: Both laparoscopic and open MAL division and celiac ganglionectomy can be safely performed with minimal patient morbidity and mortality. Late recurrence is frequently seen; however, this seems to be milder than the presenting symptoms. The laparoscopic approach results in avoidance of laparotomy and was associated with shorter inpatient hospitalization and decreased time to feeding in our study. Optimal patient selection and prediction of clinical response in these patients remains a challenge.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630683     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  26 in total

1.  Hybrid treatment of celiac artery compression (median arcuate ligament) syndrome.

Authors:  Owen P Palmer; Maureen Tedesco; Kevin Casey; Jason T Lee; George A Poultsides
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Treatment of median arcuate ligament syndrome via traditional and robotic techniques.

Authors:  Jae S You; Matthew Cooper; Steven Nishida; Elna Matsuda; Daniel Murariu
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2013-08

3.  Celiac Axis Compression Syndrome: A Syndrome of Delayed Diagnosis?

Authors:  Dhivya Prabhakar; Deepak Venkat; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-03

4.  A predictive model for patients with median arcuate ligament syndrome.

Authors:  Fred Brody; James A Randall; Richard L Amdur; Anton N Sidawy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Contemporary management of median arcuate ligament syndrome provides early symptom improvement.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Thadeus Trus; Brian Nolan; Philip Goodney; Eva Rzucidlo; Richard Powell; Daniel Walsh; David Stone
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Two patients with ruptured posterior inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms associated with compression of the celiac axis by the median arcuate ligament.

Authors:  Aya Takase; Nobuhiro Akuzawa; Takashi Hatori; Kunihiko Imai; Yonosuke Kitahara; Jun Aoki; Masahiko Kurabayashi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-02-04

7.  Short- and intermediate-term clinical outcome comparison between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted median arcuate ligament release.

Authors:  Usah Khrucharoen; Yen-Yi Juo; Yijun Chen; Juan C Jimenez; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-21

Review 8.  Laparoscopic decompression as treatment for median arcuate ligament syndrome.

Authors:  M Rubinkiewicz; P K Ramakrishnan; B M Henry; J Roy; A Budzynski
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  Review Article: Mesenteric Ischemia.

Authors:  Karthik Gnanapandithan; Paul Feuerstadt
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-03-17

10.  Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery for median arcuate ligament syndrome.

Authors:  Michael V Do; Taylor A Smith; Hernan A Bazan; W C Sternbergh; Abbas E Abbas; William S Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.