Literature DB >> 19563962

Retroperitoneal endoscopic release in the management of celiac artery compression syndrome.

André S van Petersen1, Bianca H Vriens, Ad B Huisman, Jeroen J Kolkman, Robert H Geelkerken.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Celiac artery compression syndrome (CACS) can be treated successfully by division of the median arcuate ligament and celiac plexus fibers. The standard technique is the open approach by an upper midline or left subcostal incision. Only six single cases in which a laparoscopic transabdominal approach for CACS was used have been reported. We prospectively evaluated the feasibility of the endoscopic retroperitoneal approach for treatment of CACS.
METHODS: All patients with symptoms suggestive of CACS were evaluated using splanchnic duplex ultrasound scanning, gastric exercise tonometry (GET), and multiplane selective splanchnic angiography. The criteria for treatment were chronic abdominal symptoms, respiratory-dependent CA stenosis, and abnormal GET result. The release was performed by a retroperitoneal endoscopic approach. Anatomic success of the procedure was confirmed by angiography.
RESULTS: The endoscopic retroperitoneal approach was used to treat 46 patients with CACS. One patient (2%) required conversion to an open procedure due to suprarenal artery bleeding. Release was ended prematurely in one patient due to a pneumothorax resulting in loss of working space. A postoperative pneumothorax developed in two patients, of which one needed treatment. No other complications were observed. Postoperative angiography during inspiration and expiration showed normal vessel anatomy in 36 of 46 patients. Six of 10 patients with persisting intraluminal stenoses were treated endovascularly. Five of these were successful, which brings the primary-assisted anatomic patency for the total group to 89% (41 of 46 patients). Three patients are being observed, and endovascular treatment remains an option in case of insufficient improvement. On median follow-up of 20 months (range, 2-42 months) 41 patients were free of symptoms or showed significant improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic retroperitoneal approach for the release of the CA in CACS, with additional endovascular treatment of persistent stenosis, is feasible and effective. Short-term results were comparable with the open procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19563962     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  10 in total

1.  A predictive model for patients with median arcuate ligament syndrome.

Authors:  Fred Brody; James A Randall; Richard L Amdur; Anton N Sidawy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Contemporary management of median arcuate ligament syndrome provides early symptom improvement.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Thadeus Trus; Brian Nolan; Philip Goodney; Eva Rzucidlo; Richard Powell; Daniel Walsh; David Stone
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Short- and intermediate-term clinical outcome comparison between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted median arcuate ligament release.

Authors:  Usah Khrucharoen; Yen-Yi Juo; Yijun Chen; Juan C Jimenez; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-21

4.  A nationwide analysis of median arcuate ligament release between 2010 and 2020: a NSQIP Study.

Authors:  Gustavo Romero-Velez; Juan S Barajas-Gamboa; Juan Pablo Pantoja; Ricard Corcelles; John Rodriguez; Salvador Navarrete; Woosup M Park; Mathew Kroh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 5.  Laparoscopic decompression as treatment for median arcuate ligament syndrome.

Authors:  M Rubinkiewicz; P K Ramakrishnan; B M Henry; J Roy; A Budzynski
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery for median arcuate ligament syndrome.

Authors:  Michael V Do; Taylor A Smith; Hernan A Bazan; W C Sternbergh; Abbas E Abbas; William S Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Clinical management of chronic mesenteric ischemia.

Authors:  Louisa Jd van Dijk; Desirée van Noord; Annemarie C de Vries; Jeroen J Kolkman; Robert H Geelkerken; Hence Jm Verhagen; Adriaan Moelker; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  Laparoscopic Surgery for Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS): A Prospective Cohort of 52 Patients.

Authors:  Syed Sajid Hussain Kazmi; Nathkai Safi; Simen Tveten Berge; Marryam Kazmi; Jon Otto Sundhagen; Jonny Hisdal
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2022-03-24

9.  Celiac artery compression syndrome: an experience in a single institution in taiwan.

Authors:  Jen-Wei Chou; Chih-Ming Lin; Chun-Lung Feng; Chun-Fu Ting; Ken-Sheng Cheng; Yung-Fang Chen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  The Impact of Revascularisation on Quality of Life in Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia.

Authors:  J T M Blauw; H A M Pastoors; M Brusse-Keizer; R J Beuk; J J Kolkman; R H Geelkerken
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-11-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.