Literature DB >> 25755118

Computational prediction of manually gated rare cells in flow cytometry data.

Peng Qiu1.   

Abstract

Rare cell identification is an interesting and challenging question in flow cytometry data analysis. In the literature, manual gating is a popular approach to distill flow cytometry data and drill down to the rare cells of interest, based on prior knowledge of measured protein markers and visual inspection of the data. Several computational algorithms have been proposed for rare cell identification. To compare existing algorithms and promote new developments, FlowCAP-III put forward one computational challenge that focused on this question. The challenge provided flow cytometry data for 202 training samples and two manually gated rare cell types for each training sample, roughly 0.02 and 0.04% of the cells, respectively. In addition, flow cytometry data for 203 testing samples were provided, and participants were invited to computationally identify the rare cells in the testing samples. Accuracy of the identification results was evaluated by comparing to manual gating of the testing samples. We participated in the challenge, and developed a method that combined the Hellinger divergence, a downsampling trick and the ensemble SVM. Our method achieved the highest accuracy in the challenge.
© 2015 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FlowCAP; computational prediction; manual gating; rare cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25755118      PMCID: PMC4483162          DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  33 in total

1.  Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data.

Authors:  T S Furey; N Cristianini; N Duffy; D W Bednarski; M Schummer; D Haussler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Dynamic single-cell network profiles in acute myelogenous leukemia are associated with patient response to standard induction therapy.

Authors:  Steven M Kornblau; Mark D Minden; David B Rosen; Santosh Putta; Aileen Cohen; Todd Covey; David C Spellmeyer; Wendy J Fantl; Urte Gayko; Alessandra Cesano
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Rapid cell population identification in flow cytometry data.

Authors:  Nima Aghaeepour; Radina Nikolic; Holger H Hoos; Ryan R Brinkman
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Automated high-dimensional flow cytometric data analysis.

Authors:  Saumyadipta Pyne; Xinli Hu; Kui Wang; Elizabeth Rossin; Tsung-I Lin; Lisa M Maier; Clare Baecher-Allan; Geoffrey J McLachlan; Pablo Tamayo; David A Hafler; Philip L De Jager; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  A chromatic explosion: the development and future of multiparameter flow cytometry.

Authors:  Pratip K Chattopadhyay; Carl-Magnus Hogerkorp; Mario Roederer
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Mixture modeling approach to flow cytometry data.

Authors:  Michael J Boedigheimer; John Ferbas
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 7.  Phenotypes of stem cells from diverse origin.

Authors:  Attila Tárnok; Henning Ulrich; Jozsef Bocsi
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  Data reduction for spectral clustering to analyze high throughput flow cytometry data.

Authors:  Habil Zare; Parisa Shooshtari; Arvind Gupta; Ryan R Brinkman
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Hierarchical modeling for rare event detection and cell subset alignment across flow cytometry samples.

Authors:  Andrew Cron; Cécile Gouttefangeas; Jacob Frelinger; Lin Lin; Satwinder K Singh; Cedrik M Britten; Marij J P Welters; Sjoerd H van der Burg; Mike West; Cliburn Chan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques.

Authors:  Nima Aghaeepour; Greg Finak; Holger Hoos; Tim R Mosmann; Ryan Brinkman; Raphael Gottardo; Richard H Scheuermann
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Application of machine learning in the management of acute myeloid leukemia: current practice and future prospects.

Authors:  Jan-Niklas Eckardt; Martin Bornhäuser; Karsten Wendt; Jan Moritz Middeke
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-12-08

2.  Statistical performance of image cytometry for DNA, lipids, cytokeratin, & CD45 in a model system for circulation tumor cell detection.

Authors:  Gregory L Futia; Isabel R Schlaepfer; Lubna Qamar; Kian Behbakht; Emily A Gibson
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  Toward deterministic and semiautomated SPADE analysis.

Authors:  Peng Qiu
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Single and multi-subject clustering of flow cytometry data for cell-type identification and anomaly detection.

Authors:  Maziyar Baran Pouyan; Vasu Jindal; Javad Birjandtalab; Mehrdad Nourani
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.063

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.