PURPOSE: Complete response to induction chemotherapy is observed in approximately 60% of patients with newly diagnosed non-M3 acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). However, no methods exist to predict with high accuracy at the individual patient level the response to standard AML induction therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We applied single-cell network profiling (SCNP) using flow cytometry, a tool that allows a comprehensive functional assessment of intracellular signaling pathways in heterogeneous tissues, to two training cohorts of AML samples (n = 34 and 88) to predict the likelihood of response to induction chemotherapy. RESULTS: In the first study, univariate analysis identified multiple signaling "nodes" (readouts of modulated intracellular signaling proteins) that correlated with response (i.e., AUC(ROC) > or = 0.66; P < or = 0.05) at a level greater than age. After accounting for age, similar findings were observed in the second study. For patients <60 years old, complete response was associated with the presence of intact apoptotic pathways. In patients > or =60 years old, nonresponse was associated with FLT3 ligand-mediated increase in phosphorylated Akt and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Results were independent of cytogenetics, FLT3 mutational status, and diagnosis of secondary AML. CONCLUSIONS: These data emphasize the value of performing quantitative SCNP under modulated conditions as a basis for the development of tests highly predictive for response to induction chemotherapy. SCNP provides information distinct from other known prognostic factors such as age, secondary AML, cytogenetics, and molecular alterations and is potentially combinable with the latter to improve clinical decision making. Independent validation studies are warranted. Copyright 2010 AACR.
PURPOSE: Complete response to induction chemotherapy is observed in approximately 60% of patients with newly diagnosed non-M3 acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). However, no methods exist to predict with high accuracy at the individual patient level the response to standard AML induction therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We applied single-cell network profiling (SCNP) using flow cytometry, a tool that allows a comprehensive functional assessment of intracellular signaling pathways in heterogeneous tissues, to two training cohorts of AML samples (n = 34 and 88) to predict the likelihood of response to induction chemotherapy. RESULTS: In the first study, univariate analysis identified multiple signaling "nodes" (readouts of modulated intracellular signaling proteins) that correlated with response (i.e., AUC(ROC) > or = 0.66; P < or = 0.05) at a level greater than age. After accounting for age, similar findings were observed in the second study. For patients <60 years old, complete response was associated with the presence of intact apoptotic pathways. In patients > or =60 years old, nonresponse was associated with FLT3 ligand-mediated increase in phosphorylated Akt and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Results were independent of cytogenetics, FLT3 mutational status, and diagnosis of secondary AML. CONCLUSIONS: These data emphasize the value of performing quantitative SCNP under modulated conditions as a basis for the development of tests highly predictive for response to induction chemotherapy. SCNP provides information distinct from other known prognostic factors such as age, secondary AML, cytogenetics, and molecular alterations and is potentially combinable with the latter to improve clinical decision making. Independent validation studies are warranted. Copyright 2010 AACR.
Authors: Heiko Becker; Guido Marcucci; Kati Maharry; Michael D Radmacher; Krzysztof Mrózek; Dean Margeson; Susan P Whitman; Yue-Zhong Wu; Sebastian Schwind; Peter Paschka; Bayard L Powell; Thomas H Carter; Jonathan E Kolitz; Meir Wetzler; Andrew J Carroll; Maria R Baer; Michael A Caligiuri; Richard A Larson; Clara D Bloomfield Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Konstanze Döhner; Richard F Schlenk; Marianne Habdank; Claudia Scholl; Frank G Rücker; Andrea Corbacioglu; Lars Bullinger; Stefan Fröhling; Hartmut Döhner Journal: Blood Date: 2005-07-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: C D Bloomfield; D Lawrence; J C Byrd; A Carroll; M J Pettenati; R Tantravahi; S R Patil; F R Davey; D T Berg; C A Schiffer; D C Arthur; R J Mayer Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1998-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Stephen E Kurtz; Christopher A Eide; Andy Kaempf; Vishesh Khanna; Samantha L Savage; Angela Rofelty; Isabel English; Hibery Ho; Ravi Pandya; William J Bolosky; Hoifung Poon; Michael W Deininger; Robert Collins; Ronan T Swords; Justin Watts; Daniel A Pollyea; Bruno C Medeiros; Elie Traer; Cristina E Tognon; Motomi Mori; Brian J Druker; Jeffrey W Tyner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Amy L Hazen; Sander H Diks; Joseph A Wahle; Gwenny M Fuhler; Maikel P Peppelenbosch; William G Kerr Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Alessandra Cesano; Omar Perbellini; Erik Evensen; Charles C Chu; Federica Cioffi; Jason Ptacek; Rajendra N Damle; Roberto Chignola; James Cordeiro; Xiao-jie Yan; Rachael E Hawtin; Ilaria Nichele; Jodi R Ware; Chiara Cavallini; Ornella Lovato; Roberta Zanotti; Kanti R Rai; Nicholas Chiorazzi; Giovanni Pizzolo; Maria T Scupoli Journal: Haematologica Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: William E Pierceall; Steven M Kornblau; Nicole E Carlson; Xuelin Huang; Noel Blake; Ryan Lena; Michael Elashoff; Marina Konopleva; Michael H Cardone; Michael Andreeff Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: David B Rosen; Mark D Minden; Steven M Kornblau; Aileen Cohen; Urte Gayko; Santosh Putta; John Woronicz; Erik Evensen; Wendy J Fantl; Alessandra Cesano Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Norman J Lacayo; Todd A Alonzo; Urte Gayko; David B Rosen; Matt Westfall; Norman Purvis; Santosh Putta; Brent Louie; James Hackett; Aileen Cleary Cohen; Alessandra Cesano; Robert Gerbing; Yaddanapudi Ravindranath; Gary V Dahl; Alan Gamis; Soheil Meshinchi Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 6.998