Literature DB >> 28234411

Toward deterministic and semiautomated SPADE analysis.

Peng Qiu1.   

Abstract

SPADE stands for spanning-tree progression analysis for density-normalized events. It combines downsampling, clustering and a minimum-spanning tree to provide an intuitive visualization of high-dimensional single-cell data, which assists with the interpretation of the cellular heterogeneity underlying the data. SPADE has been widely used for analysis of high-content flow cytometry data and CyTOF data. The downsampling and clustering components of SPADE are both stochastic, which lead to stochasticity in the tree visualization it generates. Running SPADE twice on the same data may generate two different tree structures. Although they typically lead to the same biological interpretation of subpopulations present in the data, robustness of the algorithm can be improved. Another avenue of improvement is the interpretation of the SPADE tree, which involves visual inspection of multiple colored versions of the tree based on expression of measured markers. This is essentially manual gating on the SPADE tree and can benefit from automated algorithms. This article presents improvements of SPADE in both aspects above, leading to a deterministic SPADE algorithm and a software implementation for semiautomated interpretation.
© 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SPADE; deterministic

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28234411      PMCID: PMC5410769          DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  37 in total

1.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks.

Authors:  Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Rapid cell population identification in flow cytometry data.

Authors:  Nima Aghaeepour; Radina Nikolic; Holger H Hoos; Ryan R Brinkman
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  Automated high-dimensional flow cytometric data analysis.

Authors:  Saumyadipta Pyne; Xinli Hu; Kui Wang; Elizabeth Rossin; Tsung-I Lin; Lisa M Maier; Clare Baecher-Allan; Geoffrey J McLachlan; Pablo Tamayo; David A Hafler; Philip L De Jager; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  A chromatic explosion: the development and future of multiparameter flow cytometry.

Authors:  Pratip K Chattopadhyay; Carl-Magnus Hogerkorp; Mario Roederer
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Mixture modeling approach to flow cytometry data.

Authors:  Michael J Boedigheimer; John Ferbas
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.355

6.  Methods for discovery and characterization of cell subsets in high dimensional mass cytometry data.

Authors:  Kirsten E Diggins; P Brent Ferrell; Jonathan M Irish
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  Extracting a cellular hierarchy from high-dimensional cytometry data with SPADE.

Authors:  Peng Qiu; Erin F Simonds; Sean C Bendall; Kenneth D Gibbs; Robert V Bruggner; Michael D Linderman; Karen Sachs; Garry P Nolan; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  The curvHDR method for gating flow cytometry samples.

Authors:  Ulrike Naumann; George Luta; Matthew P Wand
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Hierarchical modeling for rare event detection and cell subset alignment across flow cytometry samples.

Authors:  Andrew Cron; Cécile Gouttefangeas; Jacob Frelinger; Lin Lin; Satwinder K Singh; Cedrik M Britten; Marij J P Welters; Sjoerd H van der Burg; Mike West; Cliburn Chan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques.

Authors:  Nima Aghaeepour; Greg Finak; Holger Hoos; Tim R Mosmann; Ryan Brinkman; Raphael Gottardo; Richard H Scheuermann
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  A Cancer Biologist's Primer on Machine Learning Applications in High-Dimensional Cytometry.

Authors:  Timothy J Keyes; Pablo Domizi; Yu-Chen Lo; Garry P Nolan; Kara L Davis
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 2.  Single-cell technologies in reproductive immunology.

Authors:  Jessica Vazquez; Irene M Ong; Aleksandar K Stanic
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  Agile workflow for interactive analysis of mass cytometry data.

Authors:  Julia Casado; Oskari Lehtonen; Ville Rantanen; Katja Kaipio; Luca Pasquini; Antti Häkkinen; Elenora Petrucci; Johanna Hynninen; Sakari Hietanen; Olli Carpén; Mauro Biffoni; Anniina Färkkilä; Sampsa Hautaniemi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Loss of CXCR3 expression on memory B cells in individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Wendy E Powell; Stephanie J Hanna; Claire N Hocter; Emma Robinson; Joanne Davies; Gareth J Dunseath; Stephen Luzio; Daniel Farewell; Li Wen; Colin M Dayan; David A Price; Kristin Ladell; F Susan Wong
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Immune Cell Profiling During Switching from Natalizumab to Fingolimod Reveals Differential Effects on Systemic Immune-Regulatory Networks and on Trafficking of Non-T Cell Populations into the Cerebrospinal Fluid-Results from the ToFingo Successor Study.

Authors:  Lisa Lohmann; Claudia Janoschka; Andreas Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Svenja Klinsing; Lucienne Kirstein; Uta Hanning; Timo Wirth; Tilman Schneider-Hohendorf; Nicholas Schwab; Catharina C Gross; Maria Eveslage; Sven G Meuth; Heinz Wiendl; Luisa Klotz
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Multi-Dimensional Flow Cytometry Analyses Reveal a Dichotomous Role for Nitric Oxide in Melanoma Patients Receiving Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Saurabh K Garg; Matthew J Ott; A G M Mostofa; Zhihua Chen; Y Ann Chen; Jodi Kroeger; Biwei Cao; Adam W Mailloux; Alisha Agrawal; Braydon J Schaible; Amod Sarnaik; Jeffrey S Weber; Anders E Berglund; James J Mulé; Joseph Markowitz
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Challenges in the Multivariate Analysis of Mass Cytometry Data: The Effect of Randomization.

Authors:  Georgios Papoutsoglou; Vincenzo Lagani; Angelika Schmidt; Konstantinos Tsirlis; David-Gómez Cabrero; Jesper Tegnér; Ioannis Tsamardinos
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  Slow progressors to type 1 diabetes lose islet autoantibodies over time, have few islet antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and exhibit a distinct CD95hi B cell phenotype.

Authors:  Stephanie J Hanna; Wendy E Powell; Anna E Long; Emma J S Robinson; Joanne Davies; Clare Megson; Alexandra Howell; Taz J Jones; Kristin Ladell; David A Price; Colin M Dayan; Alistair J K Williams; Kathleen M Gillespie; F Susan Wong
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Risk-associated alterations in marrow T cells in pediatric leukemia.

Authors:  Jithendra Kini Bailur; Samuel S McCachren; Katherine Pendleton; Juan C Vasquez; Hong Seo Lim; Alyssa Duffy; Deon B Doxie; Akhilesh Kaushal; Connor Foster; Deborah DeRyckere; Sharon Castellino; Melissa L Kemp; Peng Qiu; Madhav V Dhodapkar; Kavita M Dhodapkar
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-08-20

Review 10.  Recent Advances in Computer-Assisted Algorithms for Cell Subtype Identification of Cytometry Data.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Silvia Liu; Yusi Fang; Xiangning Xue; Jian Zou; George Tseng; Liza Konnikova
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.