BACKGROUND: Rheumatologists face time pressures similar to primary care but have not generally benefitted from optimized team-based rooming during the time from the waiting room until the rheumatologist enters the room. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess current capacity for population management in rheumatology clinics; we aimed to measure the tasks performed by rheumatology clinic staff (medical assistants or nurses) during rooming. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional time-study and work-system analysis to measure rooming workflows at 3 rheumatology clinics in an academic multispecialty practice during 2014-2015. We calculated descriptive statistics and compared frequencies and durations using Fisher exact test and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Observing 190 rheumatology clinic previsit rooming sequences (1419 minutes), we found many significant variations. Total rooming duration varied by clinic (median, 6.75-8.25 minutes; p < 0.001). Vital sign measurement and medication reconciliation accounted for more than half of rooming duration. Among 3 clinics, two of 15 tasks varied significantly in duration, and 9 varied in frequency. Findings led clinic leaders to modify policies and procedures regarding 6 high-variation tasks streamlining assessment of weight, height, pain scores, tobacco use, disease activity, and refill needs. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing rheumatology rooming tasks identified key opportunities to improve quality and efficiency without burdening providers. This project demonstrated user-friendly methods to identify opportunities to standardize rooming and support data-driven decisions regarding rheumatology clinic practice changes to improve population management in rheumatology.
BACKGROUND: Rheumatologists face time pressures similar to primary care but have not generally benefitted from optimized team-based rooming during the time from the waiting room until the rheumatologist enters the room. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess current capacity for population management in rheumatology clinics; we aimed to measure the tasks performed by rheumatology clinic staff (medical assistants or nurses) during rooming. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional time-study and work-system analysis to measure rooming workflows at 3 rheumatology clinics in an academic multispecialty practice during 2014-2015. We calculated descriptive statistics and compared frequencies and durations using Fisher exact test and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Observing 190 rheumatology clinic previsit rooming sequences (1419 minutes), we found many significant variations. Total rooming duration varied by clinic (median, 6.75-8.25 minutes; p < 0.001). Vital sign measurement and medication reconciliation accounted for more than half of rooming duration. Among 3 clinics, two of 15 tasks varied significantly in duration, and 9 varied in frequency. Findings led clinic leaders to modify policies and procedures regarding 6 high-variation tasks streamlining assessment of weight, height, pain scores, tobacco use, disease activity, and refill needs. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing rheumatology rooming tasks identified key opportunities to improve quality and efficiency without burdening providers. This project demonstrated user-friendly methods to identify opportunities to standardize rooming and support data-driven decisions regarding rheumatology clinic practice changes to improve population management in rheumatology.
Authors: Kai Zheng; Hilary M Haftel; Ronald B Hirschl; Michael O'Reilly; David A Hanauer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: James H Stein; Colleen M Hadigan; Todd T Brown; Ellen Chadwick; Judith Feinberg; Nina Friis-Møller; Anuradha Ganesan; Marshall J Glesby; David Hardy; Robert C Kaplan; Peter Kim; Janet Lo; Esteban Martinez; James M Sosman Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-06-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M J L Peters; D P M Symmons; D McCarey; B A C Dijkmans; P Nicola; T K Kvien; I B McInnes; H Haentzschel; M A Gonzalez-Gay; S Provan; A Semb; P Sidiropoulos; G Kitas; Y M Smulders; M Soubrier; Z Szekanecz; N Sattar; M T Nurmohamed Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: S van Assen; N Agmon-Levin; O Elkayam; R Cervera; M F Doran; M Dougados; P Emery; P Geborek; J P A Ioannidis; D R W Jayne; C G M Kallenberg; U Müller-Ladner; Y Shoenfeld; L Stojanovich; G Valesini; N M Wulffraat; M Bijl Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Tosha B Wetterneck; Jamie A Lapin; Daniel J Krueger; G Talley Holman; John W Beasley; Ben-Tzion Karsh Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Robert L Ferrer; Priti Mody-Bailey; Carlos Roberto Jaén; Sherrie Gott; Sara Araujo Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Michelle Tong; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Laura Block; Edmond Ramly; Douglas W White; Monica L Messina; Christie M Bartels Journal: J Clin Rheumatol Date: 2022-06-12 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Christie M Bartels; Lauren Johnson; Edmond Ramly; Daniel J Panyard; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Heather M Johnson; Patrick McBride; Zhanhai Li; Emmanuel Sampene; Diane R Lauver; Kristin Lewicki; Megan E Piper Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 5.178
Authors: Taylor L Watterson; Sara E Hernandez; Jamie A Stone; Aaron M Gilson; Edmond Ramly; Michelle A Chui Journal: Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm Date: 2022-01-25
Authors: Bayardo Garay; Denise Erlanson; Bryce A Binstadt; Colleen K Correll; Nora Fitzsimmons; Patricia M Hobday; Allison Hudson; Shawn Mahmud; Mona M Riskalla; Sara Kramer; Sheng Xiong; Richard K Vehe; Danielle R Bullock Journal: BMJ Open Qual Date: 2021-12