OBJECTIVE: Adopting features of the Chronic Care Model may reduce coronary heart disease risk and blood pressure in vulnerable populations. We evaluated a peer and practice team intervention on reduction in 4-year coronary heart disease risk and systolic blood pressure. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: A single blind, randomized, controlled trial in two adjacent urban university-affiliated primary care practices. Two hundred eighty African-American subjects aged 40 to 75 with uncontrolled hypertension. INTERVENTION: Three monthly calls from trained peer patients with well-controlled hypertension and, on alternate months, two practice staff visits to review a personalized 4-year heart disease risk calculator and slide shows about heart disease risks. All subjects received usual physician care and brochures about healthy cooking and heart disease. MAIN MEASURES: Change in 4-year coronary heart disease risk (primary) and change in systolic blood pressure, both assessed at 6 months. KEY RESULTS: At baseline, the 136 intervention and 144 control subjects' mean 4-year coronary heart disease risk did not differ (intervention=5.8 % and control=6.4 %, P=0.39), and their mean systolic blood pressure was the same (140.5 mmHg, p=0.83). Endpoint data for coronary heart disease were obtained for 69 % of intervention and 82 % of control subjects. After multiple imputation for missing endpoint data, the reduction in risk among all 280 subjects favored the intervention, but was not statistically significant (difference -0.73 %, 95 % confidence interval: -1.54 % to 0.09 %, p=0.08). Among the 247 subjects with asystolic blood pressure endpoint (85 % of intervention and 91 % of control subjects), more intervention than control subjects achieved a >5 mmHg reduction (61 % versus 45 %, respectively, p=0.01). After multiple imputation, the absolute reduction in systolic blood pressure was also greater for the intervention group (difference -6.47 mmHg, 95 % confidence interval: -10.69 to -2.25, P=0.003). One patient died in each study arm. CONCLUSIONS:Peer patient and office-based behavioral support for African-American patients with uncontrolled hypertension did not result in a significantly greater reduction in coronary heart disease risk but did significantly reduce systolic blood pressure.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Adopting features of the Chronic Care Model may reduce coronary heart disease risk and blood pressure in vulnerable populations. We evaluated a peer and practice team intervention on reduction in 4-year coronary heart disease risk and systolic blood pressure. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: A single blind, randomized, controlled trial in two adjacent urban university-affiliated primary care practices. Two hundred eighty African-American subjects aged 40 to 75 with uncontrolled hypertension. INTERVENTION: Three monthly calls from trained peer patients with well-controlled hypertension and, on alternate months, two practice staff visits to review a personalized 4-year heart disease risk calculator and slide shows about heart disease risks. All subjects received usual physician care and brochures about healthy cooking and heart disease. MAIN MEASURES: Change in 4-year coronary heart disease risk (primary) and change in systolic blood pressure, both assessed at 6 months. KEY RESULTS: At baseline, the 136 intervention and 144 control subjects' mean 4-year coronary heart disease risk did not differ (intervention=5.8 % and control=6.4 %, P=0.39), and their mean systolic blood pressure was the same (140.5 mmHg, p=0.83). Endpoint data for coronary heart disease were obtained for 69 % of intervention and 82 % of control subjects. After multiple imputation for missing endpoint data, the reduction in risk among all 280 subjects favored the intervention, but was not statistically significant (difference -0.73 %, 95 % confidence interval: -1.54 % to 0.09 %, p=0.08). Among the 247 subjects with a systolic blood pressure endpoint (85 % of intervention and 91 % of control subjects), more intervention than control subjects achieved a >5 mmHg reduction (61 % versus 45 %, respectively, p=0.01). After multiple imputation, the absolute reduction in systolic blood pressure was also greater for the intervention group (difference -6.47 mmHg, 95 % confidence interval: -10.69 to -2.25, P=0.003). One patient died in each study arm. CONCLUSIONS: Peer patient and office-based behavioral support for African-American patients with uncontrolled hypertension did not result in a significantly greater reduction in coronary heart disease risk but did significantly reduce systolic blood pressure.
Authors: Jun Wu; Aldi T Kraja; Al Oberman; Cora E Lewis; R Curtis Ellison; Donna K Arnett; Gerardo Heiss; Jean-Marc Lalouel; Stephen T Turner; Steven C Hunt; Michael A Province; D C Rao Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Hayden B Bosworth; Benjamin Powers; Janet M Grubber; Carolyn T Thorpe; Maren K Olsen; Melinda Orr; Eugene Z Oddone Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrea L Hartzler; Megan N Taylor; Albert Park; Troy Griffiths; Uba Backonja; David W McDonald; Sam Wahbeh; Cory Brown; Wanda Pratt Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Kunal N Karmali; Stephen D Persell; Pablo Perel; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mark A Berendsen; Mark D Huffman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-03-14
Authors: David H Thom; Jessica Wolf; Heather Gardner; Denise DeVore; Michael Lin; Andy Ma; Ana Ibarra-Castro; George Saba Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Rachel Willard-Grace; Ellen H Chen; Danielle Hessler; Denise DeVore; Camille Prado; Thomas Bodenheimer; David H Thom Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: David H Thom; Rachel Willard-Grace; Stephanie Tsao; Danielle Hessler; Beatrice Huang; Denise DeVore; Chris Chirinos; Jessica Wolf; DorAnne Donesky; Chris Garvey; George Su Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2018-10
Authors: Nicola Small; Christian Blickem; Tom Blakeman; Maria Panagioti; Carolyn A Chew-Graham; Peter Bower Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Duc A Ha; Oanh T Tran; Hoa L Nguyen; Germán Chiriboga; Robert J Goldberg; Van H Phan; Cuc T Nguyen; Giang H Nguyen; Hien V Pham; Thang T Nguyen; Thanh T Le; Jeroan J Allison Journal: Trials Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Ann-Marie Rosland; John D Piette; Ranak Trivedi; Eve A Kerr; Shelley Stoll; Adam Tremblay; Michele Heisler Journal: Trials Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 2.279