Stephen M Petterson1, Winston R Liaw2, Carol Tran3, Andrew W Bazemore1. 1. Robert Graham Center, Washington, DC. 2. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia winstonrliaw@gmail.com. 3. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to calculate the projected primary care physician shortage, determine the amount and composition of residency growth needed, and estimate the impact of retirement age and panel size changes. METHODS: We used the 2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to calculate utilization of ambulatory primary care services and the US Census Bureau to project demographic changes. To determine the baseline number of primary care physicians and the number retiring at 66 years, we used the 2014 American Medical Association Masterfile. Using specialty board and American Osteopathic Association figures, we estimated the annual production of primary care residents. To calculate shortages, we subtracted the accumulated primary care physician production from the accumulated number of primary care physicians needed for each year from 2015 to 2035. RESULTS: More than 44,000 primary care physicians will be needed by 2035. Current primary care production rates will be unable to meet demand, resulting in a shortage in excess of 33,000 primary care physicians. Given current production, an additional 1,700 primary care residency slots will be necessary by 2035. A 10% reduction in the ratio of population per primary care physician would require more than 3,000 additional slots by 2035, whereas changing the expected retirement age from 66 years to 64 years would require more than 2,400 additional slots. CONCLUSIONS: To eliminate projected shortages in 2035, primary care residency production must increase by 21% compared with current production. Delivery models that shift toward smaller ratios of population to primary care physicians may substantially increase the shortage.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to calculate the projected primary care physician shortage, determine the amount and composition of residency growth needed, and estimate the impact of retirement age and panel size changes. METHODS: We used the 2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to calculate utilization of ambulatory primary care services and the US Census Bureau to project demographic changes. To determine the baseline number of primary care physicians and the number retiring at 66 years, we used the 2014 American Medical Association Masterfile. Using specialty board and American Osteopathic Association figures, we estimated the annual production of primary care residents. To calculate shortages, we subtracted the accumulated primary care physician production from the accumulated number of primary care physicians needed for each year from 2015 to 2035. RESULTS: More than 44,000 primary care physicians will be needed by 2035. Current primary care production rates will be unable to meet demand, resulting in a shortage in excess of 33,000 primary care physicians. Given current production, an additional 1,700 primary care residency slots will be necessary by 2035. A 10% reduction in the ratio of population per primary care physician would require more than 3,000 additional slots by 2035, whereas changing the expected retirement age from 66 years to 64 years would require more than 2,400 additional slots. CONCLUSIONS: To eliminate projected shortages in 2035, primary care residency production must increase by 21% compared with current production. Delivery models that shift toward smaller ratios of population to primary care physicians may substantially increase the shortage.
Authors: Stephen M Petterson; Robert L Phillips; Andrew W Bazemore; Bridget Teevan Burke; Gerald T Koinis Journal: Am Fam Physician Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 3.292
Authors: Christine A Sinsky; Rachel Willard-Grace; Andrew M Schutzbank; Thomas A Sinsky; David Margolius; Thomas Bodenheimer Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Stephen M Petterson; Winston R Liaw; Robert L Phillips; David L Rabin; David S Meyers; Andrew W Bazemore Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Pamela Jo Johnson; Neha Ghildayal; Andrew C Ward; Bjorn C Westgard; Lori L Boland; Jon S Hokanson Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Robert L Phillips; Perry A Pugno; John W Saultz; Michael L Tuggy; Jeffrey M Borkan; Grant S Hoekzema; Jennifer E DeVoe; Jane A Weida; Lars E Peterson; Lauren S Hughes; Jerry E Kruse; James C Puffer Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Candice Chen; Stephen Petterson; Robert L Phillips; Fitzhugh Mullan; Andrew Bazemore; Sarah D O'Donnell Journal: Acad Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Peter Wingrove; Winston Liaw; Jeremy Weiss; Stephen Petterson; John Maier; Andrew Bazemore Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 5.166