Literature DB >> 25754949

Patient-reported outcomes as end points and outcome indicators in solid tumours.

Angeles A Secord1, Robert L Coleman2, Laura J Havrilesky1, Amy P Abernethy3, Gregory P Samsa4, David Cella5.   

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, such as quality of life, have been associated with relevant clinical end points and are prognostic for survival outcomes in a variety of solid cancers in adults. In the past few years, PROs have garnered a greater influence as established and clinically relevant measures that could alter the current paradigm of practice-changing therapeutic advances, as it has been recognized that classic clinical end points do not accurately portray a full appreciation of the benefits, risks and costs of therapy. In this Review, we comprehensively assess the correlation of PROs with treatment response and survival, and explore tumour-related and patient-centric composite end points in patients with cancer participating in clinical trials. Comparisons or composite end points that consider tumour-related and PRO components might help health-care providers, patients with cancer and decision makers to better understand the total clinical benefit of therapeutic interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25754949     DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  86 in total

1.  Patients' preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a conjoint analysis.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Ateesha F Mohamed; Henrik W Finnern; Anette Woehl; A Brett Hauber
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Quality of life outcomes from a randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in advanced carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Bradley J Monk; Helen Q Huang; David Cella; Harry J Long
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials.

Authors:  Chantal Quinten; Corneel Coens; Murielle Mauer; Sylvie Comte; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Charles Cleeland; David Osoba; Kristin Bjordal; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Prognostic value of quality of life scores in a trial of chemotherapy with or without interferon in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.

Authors:  A Coates; D Thomson; G R McLeod; P Hersey; P G Gill; I N Olver; R Kefford; R M Lowenthal; G Beadle; E Walpole
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Randomized phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus vinorelbine or mitomycin C plus vinblastine in women with taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Alan M Keller; Robert G Mennel; Vassilis A Georgoulias; Jean-Marc Nabholtz; Aura Erazo; Anna Lluch; Charles L Vogel; Manfred Kaufmann; Gunther von Minckwitz; I Craig Henderson; Lillian Mellars; Leila Alland; Craig Tendler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prospective evaluation of prognostic variables from patient-completed questionnaires. North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

Authors:  C L Loprinzi; J A Laurie; H S Wieand; J E Krook; P J Novotny; J W Kugler; J Bartel; M Law; M Bateman; N E Klatt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Net clinical benefit analysis of radiation therapy oncology group 0525: a phase III trial comparing conventional adjuvant temozolomide with dose-intensive temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Meihua Wang; Mark R Gilbert; Minhee Won; Andrew Bottomley; Tito R Mendoza; Corneel Coens; Maria Werner-Wasik; David G Brachman; Ali K Choucair; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The need for a re-evaluation of best supportive care studies reported to date.

Authors:  D C Currow; K Foley; S Y Zafar; J L Wheeler; A P Abernethy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Chemotherapy options in elderly and frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS2): an open-label, randomised factorial trial.

Authors:  Matthew T Seymour; Lindsay C Thompson; Harpreet S Wasan; Gary Middleton; Alison E Brewster; Stephen F Shepherd; M Sinead O'Mahony; Timothy S Maughan; Mahesh Parmar; Ruth E Langley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Gemcitabine combined with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil in advanced and symptomatic pancreatic cancer: a clinical benefit-oriented phase II study.

Authors:  E Matano; P Tagliaferri; A Libroia; V Damiano; A Fabbrocini; S De Lorenzo; A R Bianco
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  19 in total

1.  Design Issues in Randomized Clinical Trials of Maintenance Therapies.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Richard F Little; Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The prognostic performance of adding patient-reported outcomes to the MASCC risk index to identify low-risk febrile neutropenia patients with solid tumors and lymphomas.

Authors:  Xiao Jun Wang; Denise Yun Ting Goh; Sreemanee Raaj Dorajoo; Alexandre Chan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The 5-year outcomes of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (66 Gy in 22 fractions, 3 fractions per week) for localized prostate cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yaichiro Hashimoto; Atsushi Motegi; Tetsuo Akimoto; Norio Mitsuhashi; Junpei Iizuka; Kazunari Tanabe; Yuka Ishii; Sawa Kono; Sachiko Izumi; Kumiko Karasawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Optimizing the measurement of health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  John M Salsman; Suzanne C Danhauer; Justin B Moore; Mollie R Canzona; David E Victorson; Bradley J Zebrack; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Physical function metric over measure: An illustration with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT).

Authors:  Aaron J Kaat; Benjamin D Schalet; Joshua Rutsohn; Roxanne E Jensen; David Cella
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Time to deterioration in cancer randomized clinical trials for patient-reported outcomes data: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Charton; B Cuer; F Cottone; F Efficace; C Touraine; Z Hamidou; F Fiteni; F Bonnetain; M-C Woronoff-Lemsi; C Bascoul-Mollevi; A Anota
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  The value of quality of life assessment in chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Fabio Efficace; Laura Cannella
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

Review 8.  Beyond maximum grade: modernising the assessment and reporting of adverse events in haematological malignancies.

Authors:  Gita Thanarajasingam; Lori M Minasian; Frederic Baron; Franco Cavalli; R Angelo De Claro; Amylou C Dueck; Tarec C El-Galaly; Neil Everest; Jan Geissler; Christian Gisselbrecht; John Gribben; Mary Horowitz; S Percy Ivy; Caron A Jacobson; Armand Keating; Paul G Kluetz; Aviva Krauss; Yok Lam Kwong; Richard F Little; Francois-Xavier Mahon; Matthew J Matasar; María-Victoria Mateos; Kristen McCullough; Robert S Miller; Mohamad Mohty; Philippe Moreau; Lindsay M Morton; Sumimasa Nagai; Simon Rule; Jeff Sloan; Pieter Sonneveld; Carrie A Thompson; Kyriaki Tzogani; Flora E van Leeuwen; Galina Velikova; Diego Villa; John R Wingard; Sophie Wintrich; John F Seymour; Thomas M Habermann
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 18.959

9.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Predict Mortality in Lupus.

Authors:  Desiree R Azizoddin; Meenakshi Jolly; Shilpa Arora; Ed Yelin; Patricia Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  A Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) Analysis of Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC).

Authors:  Ruchitbhai Shah; Marc Botteman; Caitlyn T Solem; Linlin Luo; Justin Doan; David Cella; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.