Literature DB >> 15911864

Quality of life outcomes from a randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in advanced carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Bradley J Monk1, Helen Q Huang, David Cella, Harry J Long.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the impact of treatment with cisplatin alone or in combination with topotecan (CT) on quality of life (QOL) in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer, and to explore the prognostic value of baseline QOL scores. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients entered on Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Protocol 179 were expected to complete QOL assessments at four time points using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Cervix subscale (Cx subscale), FACT/GOG-Neurotoxicity subscale (NTX subscale), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and UNISCALE (UNI). Adjusting for patient age, baseline scores, and effects of time, we longitudinally examined treatment effect on QOL during and after chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Among patients randomly allocated to receive cisplatin (n = 146) or CT (n = 147), there were no statistically significant differences in QOL up to 9 months after randomization despite more hematologic toxicity in the combination arm. QOL assessments were completed at rates of 98%, 85%, 68%, and 59%, respectively, for the four time points, with similar rates and reasons for nonparticipation between regimens. Baseline FACT-G (P = .0016) and BPI (P = .0001) scores were significantly associated with patient age; older patients had better QOL and less pain. Baseline UNI was positively correlated with FACT-G (r = 0.66; P < .001) and Cx subscale (r = 0.29; P < .001), and negatively related to BPI (r = -0.41; P < .0001). Baseline FACT-Cx (FACT-G + Cx subscale) was associated with survival.
CONCLUSION: Despite increased toxicity, CT did not significantly reduce patient QOL when compared with cisplatin alone. Patient-reported QOL measures may be an important prognostic tool in advanced cervix cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15911864     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  34 in total

1.  Quality of life predicts progression-free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib versus interferon alfa.

Authors:  David Cella; Joseph C Cappelleri; Andrew Bushmakin; Claudie Charbonneau; Jim Z Li; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; M Dror Michaelson; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Petignat; Michel Roy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-13

3.  Lifting symptom burden--how far off the ground are we?

Authors:  Mellar P Davis; Jordanka Kirkova
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Prognostic significance of pre-transplant quality of life in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients.

Authors:  B K Hamilton; A D Law; L Rybicki; D Abounader; J Dabney; R Dean; H K Duong; A T Gerds; R Hanna; B T Hill; D Jagadeesh; M E Kalaycio; C Lawrence; L McLellan; B Pohlman; R M Sobecks; B J Bolwell; N S Majhail
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Evaluating Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate Outcome for Health-Related Quality of Life in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Kovic; Xuejing Jin; Sean Alexander Kennedy; Mathieu Hylands; Michal Pedziwiatr; Akira Kuriyama; Huda Gomaa; Yung Lee; Morihiro Katsura; Masafumi Tada; Brian Y Hong; Sung Min Cho; Patrick Jiho Hong; Ashley M Yu; Yasmin Sivji; Augustin Toma; Li Xie; Ludwig Tsoi; Marcin Waligora; Manya Prasad; Neera Bhatnagar; Lehana Thabane; Michael Brundage; Gordon Guyatt; Feng Xie
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: patient-reported outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial (NRG Oncology-Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240).

Authors:  Richard T Penson; Helen Q Huang; Lari B Wenzel; Bradley J Monk; Sharon Stockman; Harry J Long; Lois M Ramondetta; Lisa M Landrum; Ana Oaknin; Thomas J A Reid; Mario M Leitao; Michael Method; Helen Michael; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Stress, immunity, and cervical cancer: biobehavioral outcomes of a randomized clinical trial [corrected].

Authors:  Edward L Nelson; Lari B Wenzel; Kathryn Osann; Aysun Dogan-Ates; Nissa Chantana; Astrid Reina-Patton; Amanda K Laust; Kevin P Nishimoto; Alexandra Chicz-DeMet; Nefertiti du Pont; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Quality of life measurement in women with cervical cancer: implications for Chinese cervical cancer survivors.

Authors:  Ying Chun Zeng; Shirley S Y Ching; Alice Y Loke
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 9.  Progress in gynecologic cancer research: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience.

Authors:  George A Omura
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 10.  Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.