Literature DB >> 25754302

Radiation dose reduction for coronary artery calcium scoring at 320-detector CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.

Fuminari Tatsugami1, Toru Higaki, Wataru Fukumoto, Yoko Kaichi, Chikako Fujioka, Masao Kiguchi, Hideya Yamamoto, Yasuki Kihara, Kazuo Awai.   

Abstract

To assess the possibility of reducing the radiation dose for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring by using adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) on a 320-detector CT scanner. Fifty-four patients underwent routine- and low-dose CT for CAC scoring. Low-dose CT was performed at one-third of the tube current used for routine-dose CT. Routine-dose CT was reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and low-dose CT was reconstructed with AIDR 3D. We compared the calculated Agatston-, volume-, and mass scores of these images. The overall percentage difference in the Agatston-, volume-, and mass scores between routine- and low-dose CT studies was 15.9, 11.6, and 12.6%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the routine- and low-dose CT studies irrespective of the scoring algorithms applied. The CAC measurements of both imaging modalities were highly correlated with respect to the Agatston- (r = 0.996), volume- (r = 0.996), and mass score (r = 0.997; p < 0.001, all); the Bland-Altman limits of agreement scores were -37.4 to 51.4, -31.2 to 36.4 and -30.3 to 40.9%, respectively, suggesting that AIDR 3D was a good alternative for FBP. The mean effective radiation dose for routine- and low-dose CT was 2.2 and 0.7 mSv, respectively. The use of AIDR 3D made it possible to reduce the radiation dose by 67% for CAC scoring without impairing the quantification of coronary calcification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25754302     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0637-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  31 in total

1.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium with multi-detector row CT: assessing interscan variability with different tube currents pilot study.

Authors:  Naoki Takahashi; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Evidence for lower variability of coronary artery calcium mineral mass measurements by multi-detector computed tomography in a community-based cohort--consequences for progression studies.

Authors:  Udo Hoffmann; Uwe Siebert; Arabella Bull-Stewart; Stephan Achenbach; Maros Ferencik; Fabian Moselewski; Thomas J Brady; Joseph M Massaro; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  A new iterative algorithm to reconstruct the refractive index.

Authors:  Y J Liu; P P Zhu; B Chen; J Y Wang; Q X Yuan; W X Huang; H Shu; E R Li; X S Liu; K Zhang; H Ming; Z Y Wu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Radiation dose threshold for coronary artery calcium score with MDCT: how low can you go?

Authors:  Tom D Newton; Hatem Mehrez; Kelly Wong; Ravi Menezes; Bernd J Wintersperger; Andrew Crean; Elsie Nguyen; Narinder Paul
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  CT image quality improvement using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT.

Authors:  Alban Gervaise; Benoît Osemont; Sophie Lecocq; Alain Noel; Emilien Micard; Jacques Felblinger; Alain Blum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Effect of heart rate and body mass index on the interscan and interobserver variability of coronary artery calcium scoring at prospective ECG-triggered 64-slice CT.

Authors:  Jun Horiguchi; Noriaki Matsuura; Hideya Yamamoto; Masao Kiguchi; Chikako Fujioka; Toshiro Kitagawa; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Detection of coronary calcifications: feasibility of dose reduction with a body weight-adapted examination protocol.

Authors:  A H Mahnken; J E Wildberger; J Simon; R Koos; T G Flohr; S Schaller; R W Günther
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Small lesions in the heart identified at electron beam CT: calcification or noise?

Authors:  L F Bielak; R B Kaufmann; P P Moll; C H McCollough; R S Schwartz; P F Sheedy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Optimal cardiac phase for coronary artery calcium scoring on single-source 64-MDCT scanner: least interscan variability and least motion artifacts.

Authors:  Noriaki Matsuura; Jun Horiguchi; Hideya Yamamoto; Nobuhiko Hirai; Tetsuji Tonda; Nobuoki Kohno; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  6 in total

1.  The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification.

Authors:  Bálint Szilveszter; Hesham Elzomor; Mihály Károlyi; Márton Kolossváry; Rolf Raaijmakers; Kálmán Benke; Csilla Celeng; Andrea Bartykowszki; Zsolt Bagyura; Árpád Lux; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Reducing the dose of CT of the paranasal sinuses: potential of an iterative reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Lars-Arne Schaafs; Julian Lenk; Bernd Hamm; Stefan Markus Niehues
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT.

Authors:  Andrew D Choi; Eric S Leifer; Jeannie Yu; Sujata M Shanbhag; Kathie Bronson; Andrew E Arai; Marcus Y Chen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2016-07-27

4.  Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomographic Coronary Artery Calcium Evaluation With a 64-Slice Scanner Versus a 256-Slice Scanner.

Authors:  Paul Madaj; Dong Li; Rine Nakanishi; Daniele Andreini; Gianluca Pontone; Edoardo Conte; Rachael O'Rourke; Christian Hamilton-Craig; Manojna Nimmagadda; Nicholas Kim; Badiha Fatima; Christopher Dailing; Kashif Shaikh; Chandana Shekar; Ju Hwan Lee; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2022-03-01

5.  Diagnostic Phase of Calcium Scoring Scan Applied as the Center of Acquisition Window of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Improves Image Quality in Minimal Acquisition Window Scan (Target CTA Mode) Using the Second Generation 320-Row CT.

Authors:  Eriko Maeda; Kodai Yamamoto; Shigeaki Kanno; Kenji Ino; Nobuo Tomizawa; Masaaki Akahane; Rumiko Torigoe; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2016-02-10

6.  Influence of deep learning image reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V on coronary artery calcium quantification.

Authors:  Yiran Wang; Hefeng Zhan; Jiameng Hou; Xueyan Ma; Wenjie Wu; Jie Liu; Jianbo Gao; Ying Guo; Yonggao Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.