Yutaka Tanami1, Masahiro Jinzaki1, Satoru Kishi1, Matthew Matheson1, Andrea L Vavere1, Carlos E Rochitte1, Marc Dewey1, Marcus Y Chen1, Melvin E Clouse1, Christopher Cox1, Sachio Kuribayashi1, Joao A C Lima1, Armin Arbab-Zadeh2. 1. From the Department of Radiology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan (Y.T., M.J., S.Kuribayashi); Department of Medicine/Cardiology (S.Kishi, A.L.V., J.A.C.L., A.A.-Z.) and Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health (M.M., C.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Department of Medicine/Cardiology, InCor Heart Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil (C.E.R.); Department of Radiology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany (M.D.); Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Branch, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (M.Y.C.); and Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (M.E.C.). 2. From the Department of Radiology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan (Y.T., M.J., S.Kuribayashi); Department of Medicine/Cardiology (S.Kishi, A.L.V., J.A.C.L., A.A.-Z.) and Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health (M.M., C.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Department of Medicine/Cardiology, InCor Heart Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil (C.E.R.); Department of Radiology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany (M.D.); Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Branch, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (M.Y.C.); and Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (M.E.C.). azadeh1@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epicardial fat may play a role in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD). We explored the relationship of epicardial fat volume (EFV) with the presence and severity of CAD or myocardial perfusion abnormalities in a diverse, symptomatic patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n=380) with known or suspected CAD who underwent 320-detector row computed tomographic angiography, nuclear stress perfusion imaging, and clinically driven invasive coronary angiography for the CORE320 international study were included. EFV was defined as adipose tissue within the pericardial borders as assessed by computed tomography using semiautomatic software. We used linear and logistic regression models to assess the relationship of EFV with coronary calcium score, stenosis severity by quantitative coronary angiography, and myocardial perfusion abnormalities by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Median EFV among patients (median age, 62.6 years) was 102 cm(3) (interquartile range: 53). A coronary calcium score of ≥1 was present in 83% of patients. Fifty-nine percent of patients had ≥1 coronary artery stenosis of ≥50% by quantitative coronary angiography, and 49% had abnormal myocardial perfusion results by SPECT. There were no significant associations between EFV and coronary artery calcium scanning, presence severity of ≥50% stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography, or abnormal myocardial perfusion by SPECT. CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse population of symptomatic patients referred for invasive coronary angiography, we did not find associations of EFV with the presence and severity of CAD or with myocardial perfusion abnormalities. The clinical significance of quantifying EFV remains uncertain but may relate to the pathophysiology of acute coronary events rather than the presence of atherosclerotic disease.
BACKGROUND: Epicardial fat may play a role in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD). We explored the relationship of epicardial fat volume (EFV) with the presence and severity of CAD or myocardial perfusion abnormalities in a diverse, symptomatic patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients (n=380) with known or suspected CAD who underwent 320-detector row computed tomographic angiography, nuclear stress perfusion imaging, and clinically driven invasive coronary angiography for the CORE320 international study were included. EFV was defined as adipose tissue within the pericardial borders as assessed by computed tomography using semiautomatic software. We used linear and logistic regression models to assess the relationship of EFV with coronary calcium score, stenosis severity by quantitative coronary angiography, and myocardial perfusion abnormalities by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Median EFV among patients (median age, 62.6 years) was 102 cm(3) (interquartile range: 53). A coronary calcium score of ≥1 was present in 83% of patients. Fifty-nine percent of patients had ≥1 coronary artery stenosis of ≥50% by quantitative coronary angiography, and 49% had abnormal myocardial perfusion results by SPECT. There were no significant associations between EFV and coronary artery calcium scanning, presence severity of ≥50% stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography, or abnormal myocardial perfusion by SPECT. CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse population of symptomatic patients referred for invasive coronary angiography, we did not find associations of EFV with the presence and severity of CAD or with myocardial perfusion abnormalities. The clinical significance of quantifying EFV remains uncertain but may relate to the pathophysiology of acute coronary events rather than the presence of atherosclerotic disease.
Authors: Amir A Mahabadi; Marie H Berg; Nils Lehmann; Hagen Kälsch; Marcus Bauer; Kaffer Kara; Nico Dragano; Susanne Moebus; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Raimund Erbel; Stefan Möhlenkamp Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Richard T George; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Rodrigo J Cerci; Andrea L Vavere; Kakuya Kitagawa; Marc Dewey; Carlos E Rochitte; Andrew E Arai; Narinder Paul; Frank J Rybicki; Albert C Lardo; Melvin E Clouse; Joao A C Lima Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Patricia Hartge; James R Cerhan; Alan J Flint; Lindsay Hannan; Robert J MacInnis; Steven C Moore; Geoffrey S Tobias; Hoda Anton-Culver; Laura Beane Freeman; W Lawrence Beeson; Sandra L Clipp; Dallas R English; Aaron R Folsom; D Michal Freedman; Graham Giles; Niclas Hakansson; Katherine D Henderson; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Jane A Hoppin; Karen L Koenig; I-Min Lee; Martha S Linet; Yikyung Park; Gaia Pocobelli; Arthur Schatzkin; Howard D Sesso; Elisabete Weiderpass; Bradley J Willcox; Alicja Wolk; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Walter C Willett; Michael J Thun Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-12-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: George N Chaldakov; Jerzy Beltowsky; Peter I Ghenev; Marco Fiore; Plamen Panayotov; Gorana Rančič; Luigi Aloe Journal: Cell Biol Int Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Joan F Carroll; Ana L Chiapa; Mayra Rodriquez; David R Phelps; Kathryn M Cardarelli; Jamboor K Vishwanatha; Sejong Bae; Roberto Cardarelli Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Guido A Rosito; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Frederick L Ruberg; Amir A Mahabadi; Ramachandran S Vasan; Christopher J O'Donnell; Caroline S Fox Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Damini Dey; Nathan D Wong; Balaji Tamarappoo; Ryo Nakazato; Heidi Gransar; Victor Y Cheng; Amit Ramesh; Ioannis Kakadiaris; Guido Germano; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2009-08-21 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Daniela Bertol Graeff; Murilo Foppa; Julio Cesar Gall Pires; Alvaro Vigo; Maria Ines Schmidt; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Jose Geraldo Mill; Bruce Bartholow Duncan Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 2.357