Literature DB >> 25752477

Are older women more likely to receive surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence since the introduction of the mid-urethral sling? An examination of Hospital Episode Statistics data.

W Gibson1, A Wagg1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the trends in surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in older women since the introduction of the mid-urethral sling.
DESIGN: Analysis of data from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) between 2000 and 2012. SETTING AND POPULATION: All surgical procedures for SUI in the National Health Service (NHS) in England.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics for England from 2000 to 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of invasive, less invasive, and urethral bulking procedures performed in women in three age groups.
RESULTS: There was a 90% fall in the number of invasive surgical treatments for SUI and a four-fold increase in the number of mid-urethral slings over this time. The total number of surgical procedures for SUI increased from 8458 to 13 219. However, the rise in the number of procedures in women aged over 75 was more modest-a three-fold increase from a low start of 187-and these women now make up a smaller proportion of all women receiving a mid-urethral sling (MUS).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the development and wide availability of a less invasive, safe and effective operation for stress urinary incontinence in older women, they do not appear to have benefitted. The reasons for this require prospective investigation.
© 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageing; Hospital Episode Statistics; colposuspension; incontinence; mid-urethral sling; old age; stress urinary incontinence; urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25752477     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  13 in total

Review 1.  Incontinence in the elderly, 'normal' ageing, or unaddressed pathology?

Authors:  William Gibson; Adrian Wagg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Trends in prolapse surgery in England.

Authors:  Martino Maria Zacche; Sambit Mukhopadhyay; Ilias Giarenis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Comparison of synthetic mesh erosion and chronic pain rates after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eoin MacCraith; Eoghan M Cunnane; Michael Joyce; James C Forde; Fergal J O'Brien; Niall F Davis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Changing surgical trends for female stress urinary incontinence in England.

Authors:  Martino Maria Zacche; Sambit Mukhopadhyay; Ilias Giarenis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Short and Long Term Follow up and Efficacy of Trans Obturator Tape for Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  J B Sharma; Karishma Thariani; Rajesh Kumari; Tanudeep Kaur; Bharti Uppal; Kavita Pandey; Venus Dalal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-01-22

6.  A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.

Authors:  Ozan Dogan; Aski Ellibes Kaya; Cigdem Pulatoglu; Alper Basbug; Murat Yassa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Outcomes after laparoscopic removal of retropubic midurethral slings for chronic pain.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Goodall; Rufus Cartwright; Emily C Stratta; Simon R Jackson; Natalia Price
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Complications following vaginal mesh procedures for stress urinary incontinence: an 8 year study of 92,246 women.

Authors:  Kim Keltie; Sohier Elneil; Ashwani Monga; Hannah Patrick; John Powell; Bruce Campbell; Andrew J Sims
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. Do they really matter?

Authors:  Wojciech Majkusiak; Andrzej Pomian; Edyta Horosz; Aneta Zwierzchowska; Paweł Tomasik; Wojciech Lisik; Ewa Barcz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Surgical interventions for women with stress urinary incontinence: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Mari Imamura; Jemma Hudson; Sheila A Wallace; Graeme MacLennan; Michal Shimonovich; Muhammad Imran Omar; Mehdi Javanbakht; Eoin Moloney; Frauke Becker; Laura Ternent; Isobel Montgomery; Phil Mackie; Lucky Saraswat; Ash Monga; Luke Vale; Dawn Craig; Miriam Brazzelli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.