Literature DB >> 25751836

Repeatability of aberrometric measurements with a new instrument for vision analysis based on adaptive optics.

Carles Otero, Meritxell Vilaseca, Montserrat Arjona, Juan A Martínez-Roda, Jaume Pujol.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate intersession and intrasession repeatability of aberration data obtained with a new visual simulator based on adaptive optics, which includes a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer (Adaptive Optics Vision Analyzer; Voptica S.L., Murcia, Spain).
METHODS: Thirty-one healthy right eyes were included in the study. To evaluate intrasession repeatability, three consecutive measurements without repositioning the patient or realigning the eye were obtained. Intersession repeatability was evaluated in three sessions. Aberrometric data computed from the second to the fifth order for a 4-mm pupil were used. Statistical analysis included the repeated measures analysis of variance (or the Wilcoxon signed rank test), the coefficient of repeatability, the Bland-Altman method, and the intraclass correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: No significant differences in the intrasession and intersession repeatability analysis for any of the parameters (P > .05) were found, suggesting a consistent variability of the instrument over time. Similar coefficient of repeatability values were obtained in the three sessions. The Bland-Altman analysis confirmed differences close to zero and the variations were independent of the mean within and between sessions. The intersession intraclass correlation coefficient values were generally above 0.75, suggesting moderate to high repeatability. However, some exceptions were found in the intrasession analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the new instrument provides consistent and repeatable aberrometric data. It is therefore a suitable tool to perform consistent and repeatable visual simulations. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25751836     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20150224-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  6 in total

1.  Inheritance of Refractive Error in Millennials.

Authors:  Dibyendu Pusti; Antonio Benito; Juan J Madrid-Valero; Juan R Ordoñana; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Intrasession repeatability of refractive and ocular aberrometric measurements obtained using a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Alberto López-Navarro; Inmaculada Cabezos; Dolores de Fez; María T Caballero; Vicent J Camps
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2017-05-04

3.  Repeatability of Aberrometry-Based Automated Subjective Refraction in Healthy and Keratoconus Subjects.

Authors:  Gonzalo Carracedo; Carlos Carpena-Torres; Cristina Pastrana; Ana Privado-Aroco; María Serramito; Laura Batres
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Assessment of subjective refraction with a clinical adaptive optics visual simulator.

Authors:  Lucía Hervella; Eloy A Villegas; Pedro M Prieto; Pablo Artal
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Comparison of Two Wavefront Autorefractors: Binocular Open-Field versus Monocular Closed-Field.

Authors:  Gonzalo Carracedo; Carlos Carpena-Torres; Laura Batres; Maria Serramito; Anahí Gonzalez-Bergaz
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.

Authors:  Juan Tabernero; Carles Otero; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.