Literature DB >> 25751197

Racial disparities in treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population.

J Alejandro Rauh-Hain1, Ama Buskwofie, Joel Clemmer, David M Boruta, John O Schorge, Marcela G Del Carmen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the patterns of care and survival for African American and white women with high-grade endometrial cancer.
METHODS: The linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare databases were queried to identify patients diagnosed with grade 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma, uterine carcinosarcoma, uterine clear cell carcinoma, and uterine serous carcinoma between 1992 and 2009. The effect of treatment modality on survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: A total of 9,042 patients met study eligibility criteria. African Americans had definitive surgery (76.8% compared with 88.7%; P<.001) less frequently. There was no difference in the rate of adjuvant treatment between the groups. In the crude models for both all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality, African American women had an increased overall and disease-specific hazard of death compared with white women. The overall hazard ratio for African American women was 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-1.7), and the disease-specific hazard ratio was 1.5 (95% CI 1.3-1.6). Over the entire study period, after adjusting for stage, age, period of diagnosis, registry region, urban compared with rural setting, marital status, treatment, surgery, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities, there was no association between race and lower disease-specific survival (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 1-1.2; P=.06).
CONCLUSION: African American women had lower cancer-specific and all-cause survival compared with white women. Controlling for treatment, sociodemographics, comorbidities, and histopathologic variables eliminated the difference between African American and white women in the disease-specific analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25751197     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  13 in total

1.  Overuse of external beam radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Benjamin Margolis; June Y Hou; William M Burke; Ana I Tergas; Yongmei Huang; Jim C Hu; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Rural-urban differences in surgical treatment, regional lymph node examination, and survival in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Katherine S Hyon; Paula Diaz-Sylvester; Sonya R Izadi; Graham A Colditz; Laurent Brard
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Disparities in adjuvant treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Logan Corey; Michele L Cote; Julie J Ruterbusch; Alex Vezina; Ira Winer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  More than treatment refusal: a National Cancer Database analysis of adjuvant treatment refusal and racial survival disparities among women with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  David A Barrington; Jennifer A Sinnott; Danaye Nixon; Tasleem J Padamsee; David E Cohn; Kemi M Doll; Macarius M Donneyong; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 10.693

Review 5.  Disparities in gynecologic cancer incidence, treatment, and survival: a narrative review of outcomes among black and white women in the United States.

Authors:  Mary Towner; J Julie Kim; Melissa A Simon; Daniela Matei; Dario Roque
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.661

6.  Black and Hispanic women are less likely than white women to receive guideline-concordant endometrial cancer treatment.

Authors:  Mara Kaspers; Elyse Llamocca; Allison Quick; Jhalak Dholakia; Ritu Salani; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Virtual visits among gynecologic oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic are accessible across the social vulnerability spectrum.

Authors:  Lindsey A McAlarnen; Shirng-Wern Tsaih; Rana Aliani; Natasha M Simske; Elizabeth E Hopp
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Guideline-adherent treatment, sociodemographic disparities, and cause-specific survival for endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Victoria E Rodriguez; Alana M W LeBrón; Jenny Chang; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 9.  The End of the Hysterectomy Epidemic and Endometrial Cancer Incidence: What Are the Unintended Consequences of Declining Hysterectomy Rates?

Authors:  Sarah M Temkin; Lori Minasian; Anne-Michelle Noone
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Disparities in Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Sudeshna Chatterjee; Divya Gupta; Thomas A Caputo; Kevin Holcomb
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.