Literature DB >> 25750583

Inhibiting diffusion of complex contagions in social networks: theoretical and experimental results.

Chris J Kuhlman1, V S Anil Kumar1, Madhav V Marathe1, S S Ravi2, Daniel J Rosenkrantz2.   

Abstract

We consider the problem of inhibiting undesirable contagions (e.g. rumors, spread of mob behavior) in social networks. Much of the work in this context has been carried out under the 1-threshold model, where diffusion occurs when a node has just one neighbor with the contagion. We study the problem of inhibiting more complex contagions in social networks where nodes may have thresholds larger than 1. The goal is to minimize the propagation of the contagion by removing a small number of nodes (called critical nodes) from the network. We study several versions of this problem and prove that, in general, they cannot even be efficiently approximated to within any factor ρ ≥ 1, unless P = NP. We develop efficient and practical heuristics for these problems and carry out an experimental study of their performance on three well known social networks, namely epinions, wikipedia and slashdot. Our results show that these heuristics perform significantly better than five other known methods. We also establish an efficiently computable upper bound on the number of nodes to which a contagion can spread and evaluate this bound on many real and synthetic networks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blocking; Complex contagions; Social networks

Year:  2015        PMID: 25750583      PMCID: PMC4350814          DOI: 10.1007/s10618-014-0351-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Min Knowl Discov        ISSN: 1384-5810            Impact factor:   3.670


  17 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Why social networks are different from other types of networks.

Authors:  M E J Newman; Juyong Park
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2003-09-22

3.  Halting viruses in scale-free networks.

Authors:  Zoltán Dezso; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2002-05-21

4.  Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters?

Authors:  Mauro Mobilia
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-07-11       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Structural diversity in social contagion.

Authors:  Johan Ugander; Lars Backstrom; Cameron Marlow; Jon Kleinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.

Authors:  Damon Centola
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A generalized model of social and biological contagion.

Authors:  P S Dodds; D J Watts
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks.

Authors:  Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Dynamics and control of diseases in networks with community structure.

Authors:  Marcel Salathé; James H Jones
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Leveraging social networks for understanding the evolution of epidemics.

Authors:  Gonzalo Martín; Maria-Cristina Marinescu; David E Singh; Jesús Carretero
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2011-12-23
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Agent-Based Computational Epidemiological Modeling.

Authors:  Keith R Bissett; Jose Cadena; Maleq Khan; Chris J Kuhlman
Journal:  J Indian Inst Sci       Date:  2021-10-05

2.  Topological measures for identifying and predicting the spread of complex contagions.

Authors:  Douglas Guilbeault; Damon Centola
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 14.919

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.