Literature DB >> 22474360

Structural diversity in social contagion.

Johan Ugander1, Lars Backstrom, Cameron Marlow, Jon Kleinberg.   

Abstract

The concept of contagion has steadily expanded from its original grounding in epidemic disease to describe a vast array of processes that spread across networks, notably social phenomena such as fads, political opinions, the adoption of new technologies, and financial decisions. Traditional models of social contagion have been based on physical analogies with biological contagion, in which the probability that an individual is affected by the contagion grows monotonically with the size of his or her "contact neighborhood"--the number of affected individuals with whom he or she is in contact. Whereas this contact neighborhood hypothesis has formed the underpinning of essentially all current models, it has been challenging to evaluate it due to the difficulty in obtaining detailed data on individual network neighborhoods during the course of a large-scale contagion process. Here we study this question by analyzing the growth of Facebook, a rare example of a social process with genuinely global adoption. We find that the probability of contagion is tightly controlled by the number of connected components in an individual's contact neighborhood, rather than by the actual size of the neighborhood. Surprisingly, once this "structural diversity" is controlled for, the size of the contact neighborhood is in fact generally a negative predictor of contagion. More broadly, our analysis shows how data at the size and resolution of the Facebook network make possible the identification of subtle structural signals that go undetected at smaller scales yet hold pivotal predictive roles for the outcomes of social processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22474360      PMCID: PMC3341012          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116502109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  11 in total

1.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks.

Authors:  R Pastor-Satorras; A Vespignani
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-04-02       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Random graph models of social networks.

Authors:  M E J Newman; D J Watts; S H Strogatz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Universal behavior in a generalized model of contagion.

Authors:  Peter Sheridan Dodds; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences.

Authors:  David J Crandall; Lars Backstrom; Dan Cosley; Siddharth Suri; Daniel Huttenlocher; Jon Kleinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  An experimental study of the coloring problem on human subject networks.

Authors:  Michael Kearns; Siddharth Suri; Nick Montfort
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Empirical analysis of an evolving social network.

Authors:  Gueorgi Kossinets; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A model of Internet topology using k-shell decomposition.

Authors:  Shai Carmi; Shlomo Havlin; Scott Kirkpatrick; Yuval Shavitt; Eran Shir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Quantifying social group evolution.

Authors:  Gergely Palla; Albert-László Barabási; Tamás Vicsek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks.

Authors:  James H Fowler; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years.

Authors:  Nicholas A Christakis; James H Fowler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  49 in total

1.  Quantifying collective behavior in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Jacinta C Conrad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A natural experiment of social network formation and dynamics.

Authors:  Tuan Q Phan; Edoardo M Airoldi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coupling human mobility and social ties.

Authors:  Jameson L Toole; Carlos Herrera-Yaqüe; Christian M Schneider; Marta C González
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Simplicial closure and higher-order link prediction.

Authors:  Austin R Benson; Rediet Abebe; Michael T Schaub; Ali Jadbabaie; Jon Kleinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Computational social science: Making the links.

Authors:  Jim Giles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Crowdsourcing contest dilemma.

Authors:  Victor Naroditskiy; Nicholas R Jennings; Pascal Van Hentenryck; Manuel Cebrian
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Estimating peer effects in networks with peer encouragement designs.

Authors:  Dean Eckles; René F Kizilcec; Eytan Bakshy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Inhibiting diffusion of complex contagions in social networks: theoretical and experimental results.

Authors:  Chris J Kuhlman; V S Anil Kumar; Madhav V Marathe; S S Ravi; Daniel J Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Data Min Knowl Discov       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.670

9.  Impact of Repeated Exposures on Information Spreading in Social Networks.

Authors:  Cangqi Zhou; Qianchuan Zhao; Wenbo Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Coevolution spreading in complex networks.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Quan-Hui Liu; Junhao Liang; Yanqing Hu; Tao Zhou
Journal:  Phys Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 25.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.